pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
@Strongee said in [JAC](/post/1255862) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [JAC](/post/1255832) said:@TYGA said in [JAC](/post/1255820) said:@Spida said in [JAC](/post/1255801) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [JAC](/post/1255796) said:If he does go to Dogs I would be curious as to why. We can seemingly offer him just as good money, maybe a little worse, but what’s swaying his decision? His past experiences at the club? Not a fan of Madge? Thinks our club is crap? We need to figure out why someone like him wouldn’t want to be here and fix it. The obvious answer is our results but problem is we can’t get results unless we sign better players ?
Money pure and simple.
Or
Bulldogs are selling him a bright future with the money they are prepared to spend to achieve premiership success. Their new sponsor is splashing cash.
We can sell the pics of a centre of excellence and juniors coming through. No instant success.will take time.
The word is Dogs have offered us DWZ heavily subsidised. Tigers won’t bite until Fox makes a call. Madge believes he can get back to a rep level fullback. It’s the smart play although he was bad last year.
Well he has been moved on from two clubs. If our club can't take the hint we deserve everything we get.
Totally agree . Except if they are willing to chip in like 500k of his contract, then I’d take that , especially if JAC is all about the coin .
At least he’s played at an NRL level, and to a reasonably high standard even though that’s not lately .
We've got to drop the he's cheap line. To improve we need better quality players. DWZ is not worth it if his whole contract was payed for by the Bulldogs. It is a retrograde step. He's actually worth more to us having the Dogs see out his contract.