Just a hunch, but I reckon Lee coming out saying publicly that we are out of the chase for JAC, means Nofo has agreed to terms. I reckon we would be keeping our options open if we were a chance of losing Nofo.
Unfortunately signing Nofoaluma is Plan. C when what is needed is Plan A. Our pace in the backs is reliant upon Roberts staying on field, a rookie in Kepaoa and also Brooks. Also maybe Laurie who looks more like a 6 if he can obtain a release. At some stage our club needs to invest heavily in pace in the ouside backs.
Just so I understand correctly. You would be happy to let Nofa go if he wants a cent more than his current contract which let’s assume is 450k. You also mentioned you a proud of the clubs stance on having a ceiling on player worth.
Are you also suggesting we should pay JAC the 750-800k it would take to land him here?
If you are comparing the two, that is a nonsense. You and I both know one is an elite player while the other is a club player. You need to pay to attract the best. In addition, Nofoaluma has been on overs on his last contract and performed only this year in attack. His defence was the usual standard. If the reported $450pa is correct he should have taken at least $50kpa cut. In summary, I'd have no issue moving Nofoaluma on, with his right side partner BJ following him out the door.
I'm not comparing playing abilities, but you knew that already.
I repeat the question, are you also suggesting we should pay JAC the 750-800k it would take to land him here?
Go and read my reply again. And by the way, wasn't WT's offer at or around $800 if he played f/b? Seems like you are the one out of step.
No, the offer was reported as around 650k for JAC which was before we signed another promising fullback.
So you're saying you'd pay 800k JAC, but not more than 450k for Nofa. Glad you're not in charge.
I would pay max for $400k but realistically $350k for Nofoaluma. JAC may need some extra$