Our Last 4 Games:
Vs Manly Loss 10 - 28
Vs Roosters Won 30 - 28
Vs Warriors Loss 34 - 14
Vs Titans Won 21 - 20
2 Wins, 2 Losses, Point Differential = -35
Bula's Last 4 Games:
Vs Souths Loss 12 - 22 (Galvin drops potential game winning try in last few minutes, Souths score after)
Vs Cowboys Loss 28 - 32
Vs Penrith Loss 12 -16
Vs Canberra Loss 12 -16
4 Losses, Point Differential = -22
Bula didn't win a game in his last 4, yet our point differential is 50% better with him in the team. Again, we faced much better opposition in Bula's four games, not to mention this is through the Galvin drama and yet the team still looked much better despite losing.
All four of the Games Bula played in, we could have won in the last few minutes, indicating we were in the game right up until the end.
In two of our last four games, we have been out for the entirety of the game. In the other two wins, we scraped past last place and Roosters minus 10 of the top 17.
How does a couple of lucky wins against low class opposition indicate that we have "stayed in the game when it counts" more without Bula than with?