Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:@ said:@ said:Rumours around the traps are that Maloney is not happy with his current contract and is looking for more money despite being signed on until the end of next year with Cronulla.
This thread isn't so much an issue about where he's headed, but what do you think in regard to the supposed reports that he is entitled to a pay rise? He was happy to sign his contract with Cronulla at the time (I gather that it was probably the best deal in front of him at the time,) and now because there has been a lift in the cap and players are signing on for stupid money he sees fit to want to sit down and renegotiate his existing contract.
Without knowing the structure of his contract, I'd assume that the rumours around it would suggest that Maloney had no clauses built in for cap rises. I think it's a bit rich to sign a contract with a club at the time and then expect more money because the goalposts move with the cap. I get he's probably dirty that players like Moses are on more money than him, signed purely on potential, but he should honour his contract and if he does request a release, the Sharks should be under no obligation to pay any of his fare to the new club.
Just my thoughts, what does everyone else think?
If it's okay for clubs to move the goalposts when it suits them, it should also be okay for players to do it when it suits them.
Yeah but clubs generally have to make concessions (pay some/a lot of the fare,) when they move unwanted players on, so players might have to expect that they'll need to make concessions (i.e. forfeit of their contract,) when they want out.
Do you not agree?
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Rumours around the traps are that Maloney is not happy with his current contract and is looking for more money despite being signed on until the end of next year with Cronulla.
This thread isn't so much an issue about where he's headed, but what do you think in regard to the supposed reports that he is entitled to a pay rise? He was happy to sign his contract with Cronulla at the time (I gather that it was probably the best deal in front of him at the time,) and now because there has been a lift in the cap and players are signing on for stupid money he sees fit to want to sit down and renegotiate his existing contract.
Without knowing the structure of his contract, I'd assume that the rumours around it would suggest that Maloney had no clauses built in for cap rises. I think it's a bit rich to sign a contract with a club at the time and then expect more money because the goalposts move with the cap. I get he's probably dirty that players like Moses are on more money than him, signed purely on potential, but he should honour his contract and if he does request a release, the Sharks should be under no obligation to pay any of his fare to the new club.
Just my thoughts, what does everyone else think?
If it's okay for clubs to move the goalposts when it suits them, it should also be okay for players to do it when it suits them.
Yeah but clubs generally have to make concessions (pay some/a lot of the fare,) when they move unwanted players on, so players might have to expect that they'll need to make concessions (i.e. forfeit of their contract,) when they want out.
Do you not agree?
Yeah, I do. But I can't see why it's a bit rich for a player to do that when clubs are doing the same thing every season, I've said all along that contracts should be upheld. But it will never happen. So a player wanting out is no difference to a club doing it.
It's wrong both ways
@ said:@ said:@ said:Rumours around the traps are that Maloney is not happy with his current contract and is looking for more money despite being signed on until the end of next year with Cronulla.
This thread isn't so much an issue about where he's headed, but what do you think in regard to the supposed reports that he is entitled to a pay rise? He was happy to sign his contract with Cronulla at the time (I gather that it was probably the best deal in front of him at the time,) and now because there has been a lift in the cap and players are signing on for stupid money he sees fit to want to sit down and renegotiate his existing contract.
Without knowing the structure of his contract, I'd assume that the rumours around it would suggest that Maloney had no clauses built in for cap rises. I think it's a bit rich to sign a contract with a club at the time and then expect more money because the goalposts move with the cap. I get he's probably dirty that players like Moses are on more money than him, signed purely on potential, but he should honour his contract and if he does request a release, the Sharks should be under no obligation to pay any of his fare to the new club.
Just my thoughts, what does everyone else think?
If it's okay for clubs to move the goalposts when it suits them, it should also be okay for players to do it when it suits them.
Yeah but clubs generally have to make concessions (pay some/a lot of the fare,) when they move unwanted players on, so players might have to expect that they'll need to make concessions (i.e. forfeit of their contract,) when they want out.
Do you not agree?
@ said:@ said:@ said:I just don't know why he shifts clubs so often - the guy is the fundamental reason why Cronulla won the comp. I'm told it's about money but clubs don't seem very willing to retain him despite his record.
Personally I'd rank him above Milford and Hunt.
Storm -Warriors to play first grade
Warriors -Roosters…Who wouldn't sign with them, they ha just picked up SBW, Jennings, McDonell, Moa etc. Chance to move back to aus
Roosters -Sharks... Roosters were offering a crap deal, think it was 2 years for way less than Sharks
I think you're missing my point. None of the clubs he left seemed overly interested in keeping him. I understand why he took up those offers, I just find it interesting clubs don't seem to care when he goes.
@ said:An employee of a business asking for a pay rise seems pretty normal.
And when that employee has played a significant part in making your company the best in the world within a year or two of being there, it's no surprise they're seeking compensation.
It may seem selfish or narcissistic on his part, but those qualities are also part of what make him so good at what he does.
@ said:@ said:An employee of a business asking for a pay rise seems pretty normal.
And when that employee has played a significant part in making your company the best in the world within a year or two of being there, it's no surprise they're seeking compensation.
It may seem selfish or narcissistic on his part, but those qualities are also part of what make him so good at what he does.
His payrise is due in 18 months. He is asking for it early. It doesnt matter how he is currently performing.
@ said:@ said:An employee of a business asking for a pay rise seems pretty normal.
And when that employee has played a significant part in making your company the best in the world within a year or two of being there, it's no surprise they're seeking compensation.
It may seem selfish or narcissistic on his part, but those qualities are also part of what make him so good at what he does.
His payrise is due in 18 months. He is asking for it early. It doesnt matter how he is currently performing.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:I just don't know why he shifts clubs so often - the guy is the fundamental reason why Cronulla won the comp. I'm told it's about money but clubs don't seem very willing to retain him despite his record.
Personally I'd rank him above Milford and Hunt.
Storm -Warriors to play first grade
Warriors -Roosters…Who wouldn't sign with them, they ha just picked up SBW, Jennings, McDonell, Moa etc. Chance to move back to aus
Roosters -Sharks... Roosters were offering a crap deal, think it was 2 years for way less than Sharks
I think you're missing my point. None of the clubs he left seemed overly interested in keeping him. I understand why he took up those offers, I just find it interesting clubs don't seem to care when he goes.
Yeah, he's just been instrumental in breaking a 50 year premiership cherry, and they're not fussed at paying him what he wants to keep him placated and to remain at the Sharks. **_He's probably a pain in the arse._**
@ said:@ said:An employee of a business asking for a pay rise seems pretty normal.
And when that employee has played a significant part in making your company the best in the world within a year or two of being there, it's no surprise they're seeking compensation.
It may seem selfish or narcissistic on his part, but those qualities are also part of what make him so good at what he does.
His payrise is due in 18 months. He is asking for it early. It doesnt matter how he is currently performing.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Storm -Warriors to play first grade
Warriors -Roosters…Who wouldn't sign with them, they ha just picked up SBW, Jennings, McDonell, Moa etc. Chance to move back to aus
Roosters -Sharks... Roosters were offering a crap deal, think it was 2 years for way less than Sharks
I think you're missing my point. None of the clubs he left seemed overly interested in keeping him. I understand why he took up those offers, I just find it interesting clubs don't seem to care when he goes.
Yeah, he's just been instrumental in breaking a 50 year premiership cherry, and they're not fussed at paying him what he wants to keep him placated and to remain at the Sharks. **_He's probably a pain in the arse._**
**__**
Yet they have Fifita they're as well… He couldn't be worse than him
@ said:Sounds like a greedy bastard. Wouldnt want him anywhere near this club.
@ said:@ said:Sounds like a greedy bastard. Wouldnt want him anywhere near this club.
Greedy bastard? the blokes earning 500-600k per season as an incumbent origin and fridge test player. Guys like Moses 800k and Hunt 1.2M are earning up to double he is. No wonder he wants more cash.