@ said:
@ said:
We all know he's a loss
But we all know that the roosters are a club that will spit him out as quick as they snapped him up - should someone better pop up, or should he get injured….
We offered him loyalty, in essence a lifetime contract... he's a st Gregs boy from the wests side.
But just because he's good doesn't mean we can't pick him apart.. stuff him... I'm bitter, so what. I hope he drops the ball 2000 times next year, misses tackles .. and so on... he's human... he already tried to leave once... no time for him...
We offered him loyalty????????? :laughing:
When is the penny going to drop. Loyalty only lasts until a club or player changes his or its mind.
When is this fantasy of loyalty going to get put to bed.
It doesn't exist !!!!
Loyalty isn't a fantasy. You said it yourself, even if it only lasts until someone changes their mind, it still exists, it is still feasible.
Plenty of footballers have walked out on their clubs, sure, but plenty of others have not. Loyalty is the ideal situation, the peak of club-player trust and cooperation.
Don't deride fans who seek and value loyalty. We don't all want to be cynics who can only see rugby league as a business, a method of cashflow, of employment.
If fans all held the same mentality that you speak of, if we all tossed loyalty to the kerb, then who would be left to support Wests Tigers? We'd all hitch to the Storm or Broncos bandwagon, whoever is managing sustained success, until the point at which they lose that mantle.
So fans are loyal to the club, even though loyalty is tested, and ideally we want players to be loyal as well. Players don't have to be, it's a free country, but it's reasonable that a significant number of fans will be bitter about the absence of loyalty.
Or in other words, it's easy to talk about loyalty as being secondary to "the business" and "my career" when you are drawing a salary based on the contributions of hundreds of thousands of fans.