Josh Reynolds

[Bones]

Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

All for your rumours and signing suggestions but you've lost me here.

Just hanging on to your claims we would get money back on Reynolds. You've been blown out of the water on that one.

Next.


What he said had nothing to do with cap money. Reynolds has been charged with assault. Because she is a piece of work with mental issues means she cant have been assaulted? Or she deserved it?

In a he said she said case assuming there was no witness. Credibility of the accuser is very important. If there is a proven track record of deception the word of the accuser is diminished.

Spot on. If all of these claims against her are proven it would be pretty hard to get a conviction based on her word without some form of other pretty compelling evidence.

 

[Harvey]

Assault and an application for DV are two different things mate. Happy to get lawyer bashed. I chose the wrong topic to get back into forum on! ?


He has been charged with Assualt Causing Actual Bodily Harm. Do the cops just slap that on a guy with no investigation or evidence mr Lawyer?

Yes they do in modern society. If there is any form of domestic disturbance that they attend, generally the male will be taken away and charged. Only thing that will save them is stab wounds, self defence is assault these days.

 

[The_Patriot]

Is Tiger 5150 a secondary account mods?

 

[Tiger5150]

Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

All for your rumours and signing suggestions but you've lost me here.

Just hanging on to your claims we would get money back on Reynolds. You've been blown out of the water on that one.

Next.


What he said had nothing to do with cap money. Reynolds has been charged with assault. Because she is a piece of work with mental issues means she cant have been assaulted? Or she deserved it?

He has been claiming we are going to have money freed up by releasing Reynolds for weeks now. Numerous posts. Maybe do a little research before going into bat for someone.


Yes but the point he raised, that you refuted, had nothing to do with cap money.

Maybe learn to read and comprehend before resorting to weak internet forum passive aggression.

I think you may be confused by the quoting issues on this forum.

Woke said..*."Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it."*

You said ..*."All for your rumours and signing suggestions but you’ve lost me here.

Just hanging on to your claims we would get money back on Reynolds. You’ve been blown out of the water on that one.

Next."*

I said *" What he said had nothing to do with cap money. Reynolds has been charged with assault. Because she is a piece of work with mental issues means she cant have been assaulted? Or she deserved it?*

No issues with quoting

 

[AJ1]

Don't get how people criticise the Eels as a club for lack of integrity yet are happy to throw one our players under the bus just to save a few bucks on the salary cap.

Culture starts at home. Very happy that Pascoe,Maguire and co have stood by Josh

What if he’s found guilty.

No chance.

You should tell the police, maybe they’ll drop the case.

Clever reply mate. Have you thought of writing for a living?


What did he get wrong?

I dont have it in for Josh, I saw the Ch9 piece and drew the same obvious conclusions that everyone else here has, that she seems to have serious issues and Josh seems to have been taken for a row.....*on the face of it.*

But everyone needs to take a step back.

There is a long line of people here now saying "SEE! You have to hear both sides of the story! You cant jump to a conclusion on that video!!!"

Well that is obviously true, but it is just as true based on the Ch9 piece. We still dont know what the hell happened.

As I say on the face of it, she seems a piece of work, with mental health issues and has taken Reynolds on a hard ride, but what would that excuse? Screaming at her, swearing calling her names? Maybe. What if he got sick of it and punched her in the mouth? Would that be excusable based on what she has supposedly done? Of course Im not saying he did punch her in the mouth but none of us know what happened and just as it is right to say he shouldnt be hung based on the video, he also cant be sainted because of a Ch9 piece which makes him look vindicated.

None of us know the truth and you can only hope it comes out clean through the court. You would have to think that this isnt the first the cops have heard of these allegations though.

LOL. Only a few hours ago you had decided that he was guilty and you were done with him. Now you're saying he shouldn't be hung based on the Ch9 video?
My favourite part of your post is when you said 'none of us knows the truth' yet you implied that he could have hit her in the mouth. Wow

 

[hobbo1]

When does the Comp start ?

 

[Tiger5150]

Assault and an application for DV are two different things mate. Happy to get lawyer bashed. I chose the wrong topic to get back into forum on! ?


He has been charged with Assualt Causing Actual Bodily Harm. Do the cops just slap that on a guy with no investigation or evidence mr Lawyer?

Yes they do in modern society. If there is any form of domestic disturbance that they attend, generally the male will be taken away and charged. Only thing that will save them is stab wounds, self defence is assault these days.

Understood, however to charge someone with Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, there must be some evidence taken into account? Surely the "actual bodily harm"? would be considered?

Im not passing any opinion on Reynolds guilt or innocence or the severity of any harm, I am merely refuting Mr Lawyer saying these charges would have been laid without any evidence.

 

[coivtny]

Don't get how people criticise the Eels as a club for lack of integrity yet are happy to throw one our players under the bus just to save a few bucks on the salary cap.

Culture starts at home. Very happy that Pascoe,Maguire and co have stood by Josh

What if he’s found guilty.

No chance.

You should tell the police, maybe they’ll drop the case.

Clever reply mate. Have you thought of writing for a living?


What did he get wrong?

I dont have it in for Josh, I saw the Ch9 piece and drew the same obvious conclusions that everyone else here has, that she seems to have serious issues and Josh seems to have been taken for a row.....*on the face of it.*

But everyone needs to take a step back.

There is a long line of people here now saying "SEE! You have to hear both sides of the story! You cant jump to a conclusion on that video!!!"

Well that is obviously true, but it is just as true based on the Ch9 piece. We still dont know what the hell happened.

As I say on the face of it, she seems a piece of work, with mental health issues and has taken Reynolds on a hard ride, but what would that excuse? Screaming at her, swearing calling her names? Maybe. What if he got sick of it and punched her in the mouth? Would that be excusable based on what she has supposedly done? Of course Im not saying he did punch her in the mouth but none of us know what happened and just as it is right to say he shouldnt be hung based on the video, he also cant be sainted because of a Ch9 piece which makes him look vindicated.

None of us know the truth and you can only hope it comes out clean through the court. You would have to think that this isnt the first the cops have heard of these allegations though.

Of for God's sake. He didn't get anything wrong. He expressed a point of view as did I. My guess is JR will be found not guilty. I could be wrong but I expressed a POV. I don't need to take a step back as you put it. I can express a view and you can disagree just don't pontificate because it's boring.


Take a breath mate.

I didnt have a go at you. I thought Avo raised a good point and you just mocked it without responding. I genuinely asked what you thought was wrong with it?

I didnt say YOU needed to take a step back, I said we all need to and then explained what I meant (that just as we should rush to hang him on the swearing video, we cant rush to absolve him on the Ch9 piece).

You dont see the irony in you saying you get to express your POV but mine is boring?

Maybe I should have written something concise, witty and pithy like I dont know...."Clever reply, have you thought of being a writer?"

Yeah zingers like that really keep this place humming. Let me know when I can talk next.

Why do we all need to take a step back? Because you think so? Who absolved him - not me. I expressed a view that I think he'll be found not guilty. Is that not OK in your world? I didn't see your POV was boring, I said your pontificating was boring. And it is. If you don't like what I have to say that's OK, just make a mature and intelligent comment and try not to pontificate.

 

[JC99]

Assault and an application for DV are two different things mate. Happy to get lawyer bashed. I chose the wrong topic to get back into forum on! ?


He has been charged with Assualt Causing Actual Bodily Harm. Do the cops just slap that on a guy with no investigation or evidence mr Lawyer?

Yes they do in modern society. If there is any form of domestic disturbance that they attend, generally the male will be taken away and charged. Only thing that will save them is stab wounds, self defence is assault these days.


Understood, however to charge someone with Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, there must be some evidence taken into account? Surely the "actual bodily harm"? would be considered?

Im not passing any opinion on Reynolds guilt or innocence or the severity of any harm, I am merely refuting Mr Lawyer saying these charges would have been laid without any evidence.

I read in an earlier report she had bruising, and Reynolds team were claiming the medication caused it. If all these allegations about her are true I wouldn’t put it past her to bruise herself though.

 

[Harvey]

6 boyfriends all been scammed for money and never a fraud charge laid by police, yet the first time she makes an allegation, her boyfriend is charged.

Will be interesting to see whether any of the exes went down the same path of having allegations made when the relationship went south, or whether Josh was just too big a cash cow to give up that easily or an absolute sucker.

Not sure how channel 9 got this info, but given the allegations made against Josh and videos posted from a burner account, all is fair and his legal reps have every right to leak what they have found. This is particularly so when the NRL is about to sit down and discuss stripping him of his livelihood before any sworn evidence has been presented in court.

 

[Geo]

When does the Comp start ?

Not soon enough...

 

[cochise]

This is still only another side of the story, the full details will not be established until this has been dealt with in court. I think there is enough grey in this story to justify the Wests Tigers and NRL standing by Josh in this situation though!

 

[Tiger5150]

Don't get how people criticise the Eels as a club for lack of integrity yet are happy to throw one our players under the bus just to save a few bucks on the salary cap.

Culture starts at home. Very happy that Pascoe,Maguire and co have stood by Josh

What if he’s found guilty.

No chance.

You should tell the police, maybe they’ll drop the case.

Clever reply mate. Have you thought of writing for a living?


What did he get wrong?

I dont have it in for Josh, I saw the Ch9 piece and drew the same obvious conclusions that everyone else here has, that she seems to have serious issues and Josh seems to have been taken for a row.....*on the face of it.*

But everyone needs to take a step back.

There is a long line of people here now saying "SEE! You have to hear both sides of the story! You cant jump to a conclusion on that video!!!"

Well that is obviously true, but it is just as true based on the Ch9 piece. We still dont know what the hell happened.

As I say on the face of it, she seems a piece of work, with mental health issues and has taken Reynolds on a hard ride, but what would that excuse? Screaming at her, swearing calling her names? Maybe. What if he got sick of it and punched her in the mouth? Would that be excusable based on what she has supposedly done? Of course Im not saying he did punch her in the mouth but none of us know what happened and just as it is right to say he shouldnt be hung based on the video, he also cant be sainted because of a Ch9 piece which makes him look vindicated.

None of us know the truth and you can only hope it comes out clean through the court. You would have to think that this isnt the first the cops have heard of these allegations though.

LOL. Only a few hours ago you had decided that he was guilty and you were done with him. Now you're saying he shouldn't be hung based on the Ch9 video?
My favourite part of your post is when you said 'none of us knows the truth' yet you implied that he could have hit her in the mouth. Wow

I strongly suggest you re-read my posts. A few hours ago I said I wouldnt cheer him in a Tigers jersey but I DID NOT say he was guilty, in fact I clearly said it had nothing to do with these charges.

Thats your favourite part? Shame it seems to have gone over your head.

In your post that I am quoting here you are (totally incorrectly) mocking me because you thought I thought he was guilty based on the previous video (wrong) but now think he is innocent based on the channel 9 report (Also again totally wrong). That is the opposite of what I think and it is the whole point I made in my post.

None of us know what happened. Yes it clearly appears that she has mental issues and has pushed Josh really hard,but that doesnt mean he did OR DIDNT assault her.

 

[AJ1]

Assault and an application for DV are two different things mate. Happy to get lawyer bashed. I chose the wrong topic to get back into forum on! ?


He has been charged with Assualt Causing Actual Bodily Harm. Do the cops just slap that on a guy with no investigation or evidence mr Lawyer?

Yes they do in modern society. If there is any form of domestic disturbance that they attend, generally the male will be taken away and charged. Only thing that will save them is stab wounds, self defence is assault these days.


Understood, however to charge someone with Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, there must be some evidence taken into account? Surely the "actual bodily harm"? would be considered?

Im not passing any opinion on Reynolds guilt or innocence or the severity of any harm, I am merely refuting Mr Lawyer saying these charges would have been laid without any evidence.

Yes you have passed on your opinion. You literally said this before the video broke on Ch9

"I do not know all the facts obviously. However the facts I do know are sufficient for me to make a judgement on the bloke and form my opinion"

 

[Year_of_the_Tiger]

Mr Lawyer here. I should have kept my mouth shut. This will play out however it should. I’d personally not be unhappy if Josh doesn’t play another game for us. I’m simply highlighting that a lot of blokes face similar charges and not always because they should. Justice system is rightfully there to protect families from morons, but often this situation is used for different reasons.

 

[cochise]

however to charge someone with Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, there must be some evidence taken into account? Surely the “actual bodily harm”? would be considered?

There has to be evidence of an injury for the charge of actual bodily harm to be added.

 

[Guest]

Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

Doesn't take much to lay a DV charge, not much at all. I originally closed this thread because it was full of nonsense with people going off half cocked and not having any facts whatsoever. I'm privy to facts and I'm more than confident Josh will be acquitted of the charges and there is a very good reason why the NRL haven't stood him down. I can't say more than that for obvious reasons.

 

[Harvey]

Assault and an application for DV are two different things mate. Happy to get lawyer bashed. I chose the wrong topic to get back into forum on! ?


He has been charged with Assualt Causing Actual Bodily Harm. Do the cops just slap that on a guy with no investigation or evidence mr Lawyer?

Yes they do in modern society. If there is any form of domestic disturbance that they attend, generally the male will be taken away and charged. Only thing that will save them is stab wounds, self defence is assault these days.


Understood, however to charge someone with Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, there must be some evidence taken into account? Surely the "actual bodily harm"? would be considered?

Im not passing any opinion on Reynolds guilt or innocence or the severity of any harm, I am merely refuting Mr Lawyer saying these charges would have been laid without any evidence.

Actual and grievous bodily harm are simply based on the injuries incurred, in this case bruising. The only evidence that these charges are based on is medical. If there was no assault and someone chose to throw themselves down stairs, break their neck and then make an allegation that they were pushed then the accused would face charges at the very top end of the assault scale.

The basis of the charge and evidence would be that an assault actually occurred, from that point it is the injuries that decide the level of any harm.

 

[Tiger5150]

Is Tiger 5150 a secondary account mods?

Option 1 - you can go through my posts its pretty clear who I am, I have covered it previously.
Option 2 - Flag my posts to the mods
Option 3 - Send a DM to the mods asking about me
Option 4 - Send me a DM with any issue you have with me
Option 5 - Put me on foe

 

[Year_of_the_Tiger]

Actual bodily harm can be a bruise ... But I’m going to bow out and focus on why I think we’ll make the 8.