Josh Reynolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter wokesmoke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113361) said:
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?

I still don't like the way he spoke to her in that video. Everything, on both sides, other than what can be seen in the video are allegations and should be treated as such!
 
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113361) said:
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?

How would you speak to someone if you had just found out you had been scammed for several thousand dollars, had falsely led you through the emotions of believing you were about to become a parent, only to crush that when they could no longer substantiate their lies. Someone that you had broken up with and asked to leave, only for them to keep hanging around looking to bait you for one last pay day.

You would have to be the most intelligent and emotionless person to not have an explosive reaction.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113284) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113259) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113257) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113256) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113251) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113243) said:
Don't get how people criticise the Eels as a club for lack of integrity yet are happy to throw one our players under the bus just to save a few bucks on the salary cap.

Culture starts at home. Very happy that Pascoe,Maguire and co have stood by Josh

What if he’s found guilty.

No chance.

You should tell the police, maybe they’ll drop the case.

Clever reply mate. Have you thought of writing for a living?


What did he get wrong?

I dont have it in for Josh, I saw the Ch9 piece and drew the same obvious conclusions that everyone else here has, that she seems to have serious issues and Josh seems to have been taken for a row.....*on the face of it.*

But everyone needs to take a step back.

There is a long line of people here now saying "SEE! You have to hear both sides of the story! You cant jump to a conclusion on that video!!!"

Well that is obviously true, but it is just as true based on the Ch9 piece. We still dont know what the hell happened.

As I say on the face of it, she seems a piece of work, with mental health issues and has taken Reynolds on a hard ride, but what would that excuse? Screaming at her, swearing calling her names? Maybe. What if he got sick of it and punched her in the mouth? Would that be excusable based on what she has supposedly done? Of course Im not saying he did punch her in the mouth but none of us know what happened and just as it is right to say he shouldnt be hung based on the video, he also cant be sainted because of a Ch9 piece which makes him look vindicated.

None of us know the truth and you can only hope it comes out clean through the court. You would have to think that this isnt the first the cops have heard of these allegations though.

Well there is now more to this story, based on evidence. So a better judgment can be made at this point, as opposed to last time this thread was open and people were happy to make an absolute conclusion based on a shaky video clip with no clear context or background.

I guess we still can’t confirm either way, but she’s just lost a whole lot of credibility..
 
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113373) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113361) said:
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?

How would you speak to someone if you had just found out you had been scammed for several thousand dollars, had falsely led you through the emotions of believing you were about to become a parent, only to crush that when they could no longer substantiate their lies. Someone that you had broken up with and asked to leave, only for them to keep hanging around looking to bait you for one last pay day.

You would have to be the most intelligent and emotionless person to not have an explosive reaction.


Trust me, its not worth arguing with the type of person who can t see this already.
 
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113373) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113361) said:
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?

How would you speak to someone if you had just found out you had been scammed for several thousand dollars, had falsely led you through the emotions of believing you were about to become a parent, only to crush that when they could no longer substantiate their lies. Someone that you had broken up with and asked to leave, only for them to keep hanging around looking to bait you for one last pay day.

You would have to be the most intelligent and emotionless person to not have an explosive reaction.

There is no way of knowing if the video was made after or before he found out about her actions or what led up to his actions towards her. Both sides of this are still just allegations.
 
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113373) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113361) said:
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?

How would you speak to someone if you had just found out you had been scammed for several thousand dollars, had falsely led you through the emotions of believing you were about to become a parent, only to crush that when they could no longer substantiate their lies. Someone that you had broken up with and asked to leave, only for them to keep hanging around looking to bait you for one last pay day.

You would have to be the most intelligent and emotionless person to not have an explosive reaction.

Would rather not use the c word.
 
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113380) said:
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113373) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113361) said:
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?

How would you speak to someone if you had just found out you had been scammed for several thousand dollars, had falsely led you through the emotions of believing you were about to become a parent, only to crush that when they could no longer substantiate their lies. Someone that you had broken up with and asked to leave, only for them to keep hanging around looking to bait you for one last pay day.

You would have to be the most intelligent and emotionless person to not have an explosive reaction.

There is no way of knowing if the video was made after or before he found out about her actions or what led up to his actions towards her. Both sides of this are still just allegations.

Only one side appears to have corroborating witnesses, the one that alleges that she is a criminal fraudster who has obtained money from a number of victims based on lies such as illness, pregnancy, family tragedy.

Reynolds has already had his reputation smashed, lost his white ribbon ambassador role (much like Hazem did based on the false allegations of a disgruntled ex), and was probably within a day or 2 of having his career taken away through the NRL's no ~~fault~~ evidence stand down policy.
 
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113374) said:
Well there is now more to this story, based on evidence.

There was no evidence provided in that story for either side! Everything in that story were allegations and claims of having evidence!

@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113374) said:
but she’s just lost a whole lot of credibility…

She most definitely has!
 
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113386) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113374) said:
Well there is now more to this story, based on evidence.

There was no evidence provided in that story for either side! Everything in that story were allegations and claims of having evidence!

@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113374) said:
but she’s just lost a whole lot of credibility…

She most definitely has!

I’d say her parents are a primary source! But hey maybe 6 ex partners and her own family have banded together and are all out to get her for no reason.
 
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113385) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113380) said:
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113373) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113361) said:
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?

How would you speak to someone if you had just found out you had been scammed for several thousand dollars, had falsely led you through the emotions of believing you were about to become a parent, only to crush that when they could no longer substantiate their lies. Someone that you had broken up with and asked to leave, only for them to keep hanging around looking to bait you for one last pay day.

You would have to be the most intelligent and emotionless person to not have an explosive reaction.

There is no way of knowing if the video was made after or before he found out about her actions or what led up to his actions towards her. Both sides of this are still just allegations.

Only one side appears to have corroborating witnesses, the one that alleges that she is a criminal fraudster who has obtained money from a number of victims based on lies such as illness, pregnancy, family tragedy.

Reynolds has already had his reputation smashed, lost his white ribbon ambassador role (much like Hazem did based on the false allegations of a disgruntled ex), and was probably within a day or 2 of having his career taken away through the NRL's no ~~fault~~ evidence stand down policy.

I'm not saying that I disagree with you, but the fact you had to use the word appears shows that the facts in this situation are not known 100%. This really needs to be sorted in a court room and not on an internet forum. I will say that her reputation just took a massive beating as well. I'd prefer a court to decide my quilt instead of Neil Breen from ch9!
 
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113392) said:
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113385) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113380) said:
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113373) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113361) said:
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?

How would you speak to someone if you had just found out you had been scammed for several thousand dollars, had falsely led you through the emotions of believing you were about to become a parent, only to crush that when they could no longer substantiate their lies. Someone that you had broken up with and asked to leave, only for them to keep hanging around looking to bait you for one last pay day.

You would have to be the most intelligent and emotionless person to not have an explosive reaction.

There is no way of knowing if the video was made after or before he found out about her actions or what led up to his actions towards her. Both sides of this are still just allegations.

Only one side appears to have corroborating witnesses, the one that alleges that she is a criminal fraudster who has obtained money from a number of victims based on lies such as illness, pregnancy, family tragedy.

Reynolds has already had his reputation smashed, lost his white ribbon ambassador role (much like Hazem did based on the false allegations of a disgruntled ex), and was probably within a day or 2 of having his career taken away through the NRL's no ~~fault~~ evidence stand down policy.

I'm not saying that I disagree with you, but the fact you had to use the word appears shows that the facts in this situation are not known 100%. This really needs to be sorted in a court room and not on an internet forum. I will say that her reputation just took a massive beating as well. I'd prefer a court to decide my quilt instead of Neil Breen from ch9!


Regardless of the results of the court case, that girl needs help and I hope gets it.
 
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113389) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113386) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113374) said:
Well there is now more to this story, based on evidence.

There was no evidence provided in that story for either side! Everything in that story were allegations and claims of having evidence!

@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113374) said:
but she’s just lost a whole lot of credibility…

She most definitely has!

I’d say her parents are a primary source! But hey maybe 6 ex partners and her own family have banded together and are all out to get her for no reason.

I am not defending her one bit, just saying let the courts decide what did and didn't happen! There is still so much grey in this story and circumstances that could have occured that even if everything in tonight's report are true that wouldn't justify assault.
 
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113385) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113380) said:
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113373) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113361) said:
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?

How would you speak to someone if you had just found out you had been scammed for several thousand dollars, had falsely led you through the emotions of believing you were about to become a parent, only to crush that when they could no longer substantiate their lies. Someone that you had broken up with and asked to leave, only for them to keep hanging around looking to bait you for one last pay day.

You would have to be the most intelligent and emotionless person to not have an explosive reaction.

There is no way of knowing if the video was made after or before he found out about her actions or what led up to his actions towards her. Both sides of this are still just allegations.

Only one side appears to have corroborating witnesses, the one that alleges that she is a criminal fraudster who has obtained money from a number of victims based on lies such as illness, pregnancy, family tragedy.

Reynolds has already had his reputation smashed, lost his white ribbon ambassador role (much like Hazem did based on the false allegations of a disgruntled ex), and was probably within a day or 2 of having his career taken away through the NRL's no ~~fault~~ evidence stand down policy.

While all that stuff makes for good reading and good news clicks it all has nothing to do with whether or not she was assaulted on the evening in question. Obviously she isn’t all there mentally, however to just assume this exonerates JR is throwing the black and gold blinkers on. And the video is the video. Can’t unseee it
 
@WeststigsRdaBest said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113400) said:
Welp looks like some of us were to quick to judge even tho we knew we didn’t haven’t the full story...

We still don't have the full story!
 
The big question we should be asking is, is uncle Lee and the boys at Brydens hooking Reynolds up with that schweet "No Win No Fee" deal?
 
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113402) said:
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113385) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113380) said:
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113373) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113361) said:
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?

How would you speak to someone if you had just found out you had been scammed for several thousand dollars, had falsely led you through the emotions of believing you were about to become a parent, only to crush that when they could no longer substantiate their lies. Someone that you had broken up with and asked to leave, only for them to keep hanging around looking to bait you for one last pay day.

You would have to be the most intelligent and emotionless person to not have an explosive reaction.

There is no way of knowing if the video was made after or before he found out about her actions or what led up to his actions towards her. Both sides of this are still just allegations.

Only one side appears to have corroborating witnesses, the one that alleges that she is a criminal fraudster who has obtained money from a number of victims based on lies such as illness, pregnancy, family tragedy.

Reynolds has already had his reputation smashed, lost his white ribbon ambassador role (much like Hazem did based on the false allegations of a disgruntled ex), and was probably within a day or 2 of having his career taken away through the NRL's no ~~fault~~ evidence stand down policy.

While all that stuff makes for good reading and good news clicks it all has nothing to do with whether or not she was assaulted on the evening in question. Obviously she isn’t all there mentally, however to just assume this exonerates JR is throwing the black and gold blinkers on. And the video is the video. Can’t unseee it

It will be interesting in court that given Josh was the first to approach the police, what version of events he gave, her version of events and on what basis the police decided that there was enough evidence to believe one over the other and press charges.
 
When i saw the original vid, i felt he was being set up.by the woman.

I dont now JRey but i have a lot of time for him for.some.reason
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top