Josh Reynolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter wokesmoke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113832) said:
@TillLindemann said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113827) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113825) said:
@TillLindemann said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113805) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113800) said:
@TillLindemann said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113783) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113766) said:
It's not only physical violence as you will read at the attached link. I asked myself if I would want my mother, sister or daughter (if I had one) placed in that situation in the video? Truthfully, we all know the answer.

The issue of the credibility of the young lady is a separate issue.

https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/crime/domestic_and_family_violence/what_is_domestic_violence

I'll be honest, if ANYONE I knew, including a mother, sister or daughter, lied about having cancer to extort money, lied about their parent's death to extort money, lied about being pregnant, lied about having a miscarriage, and deliberately set someone up on camera and splashed it on the internet...

**I couldn't care less if they got slapped.**

Sorry I just can't accept that. No matter what the provocation, it is contingent upon us to demonstrate discipline and restraint.

If your child was with someone who was mentally abusing them, mentally torturing them with fabrications about dead parents, cancer, miscarriages, extorting money from your child, trashing your child's reputation and character, wrecking their career... your advice to your child would be "it's contingent on you to be disciplined"?

I would hope the advice would be to get as far away from them as possible and not abuse the person as some here are suggesting!

That would be my advice too, but I certainly wouldn't get all preachy if after all that they were caught on camera dropping a c bomb.

Funnily enough I have used that word once in my life, to my dad in an argument when I was 16 in front of all my mates. Dad actually put a short left onto my chin when I said it, last time I have ever used that word. I am a person who against violence, I have never even smacked my daughter, but I will say that taught me a very valuable lesson.


I am struggling to understand the point that this post is making. That the C word is foul and should not be used, but you used it once and were subjected to a physical assault by a family member (which these days, if reported, would result in charges and AVO' s against your father) which taught you to watch your language.

You have understandably not adopted the same physical discipline against your daughter, but it is unclear what would happen if she dropped C bombs.

Are you saying that being belted taught you a lesson that you may not have learned otherwise, or that what your father did was an overreaction regardless of what had come out of your mouth to trigger it?
 
@TillLindemann said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113805) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113800) said:
@TillLindemann said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113783) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113766) said:
It's not only physical violence as you will read at the attached link. I asked myself if I would want my mother, sister or daughter (if I had one) placed in that situation in the video? Truthfully, we all know the answer.

The issue of the credibility of the young lady is a separate issue.

https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/crime/domestic_and_family_violence/what_is_domestic_violence

I'll be honest, if ANYONE I knew, including a mother, sister or daughter, lied about having cancer to extort money, lied about their parent's death to extort money, lied about being pregnant, lied about having a miscarriage, and deliberately set someone up on camera and splashed it on the internet...

**I couldn't care less if they got slapped.**

Sorry I just can't accept that. No matter what the provocation, it is contingent upon us to demonstrate discipline and restraint.

If your child was with someone who was mentally abusing them, mentally torturing them with fabrications about dead parents, cancer, miscarriages, extorting money from your child, trashing your child's reputation and character, wrecking their career... your advice to your child would be "it's contingent on you to be disciplined"?

Absolutely. To walk away from a volatile situation and seek redress through available channels.
 
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113839) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113832) said:
@TillLindemann said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113827) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113825) said:
@TillLindemann said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113805) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113800) said:
@TillLindemann said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113783) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113766) said:
It's not only physical violence as you will read at the attached link. I asked myself if I would want my mother, sister or daughter (if I had one) placed in that situation in the video? Truthfully, we all know the answer.

The issue of the credibility of the young lady is a separate issue.

https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/crime/domestic_and_family_violence/what_is_domestic_violence

I'll be honest, if ANYONE I knew, including a mother, sister or daughter, lied about having cancer to extort money, lied about their parent's death to extort money, lied about being pregnant, lied about having a miscarriage, and deliberately set someone up on camera and splashed it on the internet...

**I couldn't care less if they got slapped.**

Sorry I just can't accept that. No matter what the provocation, it is contingent upon us to demonstrate discipline and restraint.

If your child was with someone who was mentally abusing them, mentally torturing them with fabrications about dead parents, cancer, miscarriages, extorting money from your child, trashing your child's reputation and character, wrecking their career... your advice to your child would be "it's contingent on you to be disciplined"?

I would hope the advice would be to get as far away from them as possible and not abuse the person as some here are suggesting!

That would be my advice too, but I certainly wouldn't get all preachy if after all that they were caught on camera dropping a c bomb.

Funnily enough I have used that word once in my life, to my dad in an argument when I was 16 in front of all my mates. Dad actually put a short left onto my chin when I said it, last time I have ever used that word. I am a person who against violence, I have never even smacked my daughter, but I will say that taught me a very valuable lesson.


I am struggling to understand the point that this post is making. That the C word is foul and should not be used, but you used it once and were subjected to a physical assault by a family member (which these days, if reported, would result in charges and AVO' s against your father) which taught you to watch your language.

You have understandably not adopted the same physical discipline against your daughter, but it is unclear what would happen if she dropped C bombs.

Are you saying that being belted taught you a lesson that you may not have learned otherwise, or that what your father did was an overreaction regardless of what had come out of your mouth to trigger it?

I was most definitely a poor reaction from my father but he grew up in a different time and place, just because I don't condone violence does not mean I can't see the change in thought and behaviour it brought on in me. I also received the cane and got a boot in the backside from the local copper as a kid. Times and societal expectations change, I'm also not afraid to say that I view violence towards a woman as worse than violence towards a man, or that I can see a difference in 2 guys punching on compared to someone belting another guy. I grew up being taught to box and had a few fights in the ring but have not thrown a punch in anger since I was about 10.
 
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113835) said:
Unfortunately it is a very uneven playing field in domestic relationships for a number of reasons.

Men are less likely to report (or detail to friends) any mental, verbal or physical abuse that they are subjected to as it makes them appear weak or stupid. They are also more likely to be dragged into legal proceedings (AVO's and criminal charges) whenever there is any allegation made.

However there appear to be no repercussions where deliberately false allegations are made in order to provide an upper hand during property or custodial proceedings.

There are repercussions. I've been there when women have been imprisoned for public justice offences arising out of false or exaggerated allegations against their partners. Magistrates (at least some of them and probably most, if not all) despise that kind of offending because it can impact on how they assess genuine victims, which is a routine part of their job.
It's not a particularly easy thing to detect though and you need pretty good evidence to establish it. It's not easy to accept that people would be so manipulative and calculated as to make false allegations and sustain them over time. That is serious, considered criminality when they have plenty of time to reflect on what they're doing and go back on it. It's generally much easier to accept that people will, in a moment, lose control and resort to violence. Plus when they do that they tend to leave evidence in the form of injuries.
 
Lol tread lightly boys.
DV is a serious matter and things u say are sure to offend even if there is no intent.

Reminder to all....
Raising your voice to a woman can be considered domestic violence and once the police are involved, it' becomes a police matter and no matter how much your girl says she doesnt want to push it further the police will often do so anyway.

Protect yourselves.
Remove yourself from the situation.
Take some time to calm down or allow other parties to calm.
Have mediation if needed but dont put yourself in any situation where u cannot protect yourself - meaning u can't prove innocent if allegations are to be made.
Don't act in the heat of the moment.
Most importantly... control yourself.
 
According to 9 news police are now wanting to speak to Miss whatever her real name is regarding the allegations raised last night.

I hope she cops both barrels if those allegations are proven true. I also hope Josh cops the appropriate punishment if he is found guilty, though I’m starting to suspect he won’t be.
 
@Bones said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113881) said:
According to 9 news police are now wanting to speak to Miss whatever her real name is regarding the allegations raised last night.

I hope she cops both barrels if those allegations are proven true. I also hope Josh cops the appropriate punishment if he is found guilty, though I’m starting to suspect he won’t be.

I think they're gonna see this for what it is.

Tell em to grow up and go their seperate ways.

No charges for anyone.
 
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113866) said:
@weststigers said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113865) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113832) said:
@TillLindemann said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113827) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113825) said:
@TillLindemann said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113805) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113800) said:
@TillLindemann said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113783) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113766) said:
It's not only physical violence as you will read at the attached link. I asked myself if I would want my mother, sister or daughter (if I had one) placed in that situation in the video? Truthfully, we all know the answer.

The issue of the credibility of the young lady is a separate issue.

https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/crime/domestic_and_family_violence/what_is_domestic_violence

I'll be honest, if ANYONE I knew, including a mother, sister or daughter, lied about having cancer to extort money, lied about their parent's death to extort money, lied about being pregnant, lied about having a miscarriage, and deliberately set someone up on camera and splashed it on the internet...

**I couldn't care less if they got slapped.**

Sorry I just can't accept that. No matter what the provocation, it is contingent upon us to demonstrate discipline and restraint.

If your child was with someone who was mentally abusing them, mentally torturing them with fabrications about dead parents, cancer, miscarriages, extorting money from your child, trashing your child's reputation and character, wrecking their career... your advice to your child would be "it's contingent on you to be disciplined"?

I would hope the advice would be to get as far away from them as possible and not abuse the person as some here are suggesting!

That would be my advice too, but I certainly wouldn't get all preachy if after all that they were caught on camera dropping a c bomb.

Funnily enough I have used that word once in my life, to my dad in an argument when I was 16 in front of all my mates. Dad actually put a short left onto my chin when I said it, last time I have ever used that word. I am a person who against violence, I have never even smacked my daughter, but I will say that taught me a very valuable lesson.

So...DV is good in some instances? :joy:

Where did I say that?

DV includes getting smacked in the mouth for dropping the c bomb at your Dad :wink:

Relax big fella. I know you didn't say that...I was just joking :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
 
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113885) said:
@Bones said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113881) said:
According to 9 news police are now wanting to speak to Miss whatever her real name is regarding the allegations raised last night.

I hope she cops both barrels if those allegations are proven true. I also hope Josh cops the appropriate punishment if he is found guilty, though I’m starting to suspect he won’t be.

I think they're gonna see this for what it is.

Tell em to grow up and go their seperate ways.

No charges for anyone.

I think she'll get in more trouble now than Josh will. Not because of whatever has happened or didn't happen, that's now irrelevant, but because he has more money and has got more expensive lawyers who have already influenced the media getting his story out.

Right or wrong, he will get off.
 
@JD-Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113893) said:
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113885) said:
@Bones said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113881) said:
According to 9 news police are now wanting to speak to Miss whatever her real name is regarding the allegations raised last night.

I hope she cops both barrels if those allegations are proven true. I also hope Josh cops the appropriate punishment if he is found guilty, though I’m starting to suspect he won’t be.

I think they're gonna see this for what it is.

Tell em to grow up and go their seperate ways.

No charges for anyone.

I think she'll get in more trouble now than Josh will. Not because of whatever has happened or didn't happen, that's now irrelevant, but because he has more money and has got more expensive lawyers who have already influenced the media getting his story out.

Right or wrong, he will get off.

Whats she gonna get in trouble for?

Lying about being pregnant?
Asking him for money?
Lying about her name?

Wow... serious crimes.
Throw the book at her.

System isn't designed to take the mans side.
 
@JD-Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113893) said:
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113885) said:
@Bones said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113881) said:
According to 9 news police are now wanting to speak to Miss whatever her real name is regarding the allegations raised last night.

I hope she cops both barrels if those allegations are proven true. I also hope Josh cops the appropriate punishment if he is found guilty, though I’m starting to suspect he won’t be.

I think they're gonna see this for what it is.

Tell em to grow up and go their seperate ways.

No charges for anyone.

I think she'll get in more trouble now than Josh will. Not because of whatever has happened or didn't happen, that's now irrelevant, but because he has more money and has got more expensive lawyers who have already influenced the media getting his story out.

Right or wrong, he will get off.

Not being a trial by jury, we could expect a magistrate to rule based solely on that which is presented in court.
 
A lot was debated last night. Sensitive issue. Sounds like Josh has a decent case to fight and we should back him till we see something concrete otherwise. Heart and soul player I only hope he can stay on field If he gets the chance.
 
Tigerballs,

Have you had a wife plead with you not to bring her drunken husband into the house because "he'll beat the shit of me?"

Or being duty mug and called out in the early am to stand between a senior public servant about to give his wife another punch to the head?

You see the joke was on me because a lot of men knew the true nature of these "men". I guess they didn't know what to do with them.

There was no safety net for these poor women, no help, not a thing. They were reliant upon a kid (I was just turned 19) to protect them.

It left an impression on me, both physically (I got hit) and metaphorically.

So walk away from a volatile situation.
 
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113894) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113893) said:
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113885) said:
@Bones said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113881) said:
According to 9 news police are now wanting to speak to Miss whatever her real name is regarding the allegations raised last night.

I hope she cops both barrels if those allegations are proven true. I also hope Josh cops the appropriate punishment if he is found guilty, though I’m starting to suspect he won’t be.

I think they're gonna see this for what it is.

Tell em to grow up and go their seperate ways.

No charges for anyone.

I think she'll get in more trouble now than Josh will. Not because of whatever has happened or didn't happen, that's now irrelevant, but because he has more money and has got more expensive lawyers who have already influenced the media getting his story out.

Right or wrong, he will get off.

Whats she gonna get in trouble for?

Lying about being pregnant?
Asking him for money?
Lying about her name?

Wow... serious crimes.
Throw the book at her.

System isn't designed to take the mans side.

You're right about the system designed to protect the woman, and fair enough too due to the history of women not being protected.

I just mean she'll get in trouble through the media, I can just see this as a shaming thing, her character will continue to be destroyed in the press. Legally nothing much.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113908) said:
Tigerballs,

Have you had a wife plead with you not to bring her drunken husband into the house because "he'll beat the shit of me?"

Or being duty mug and called out in the early am to stand between a senior public servant about to give his wife another punch to the head?

You see the joke was on me because a lot of men knew the true nature of these "men". I guess they didn't know what to do with them.

There was no safety net for these poor women, no help, not a thing. They were reliant upon a kid (I was just turned 19) to protect them.

It left an impression on me, both physically (I got hit) and metaphorically.

So walk away from a volatile situation.

Good post.

Well done.

Yep, its easy to get angry and lash out
Its not as easy as to put ya life back together as it's shattered by criminal charges and concoctions.

Take heed adlays
 
@JD-Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113913) said:
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113894) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113893) said:
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113885) said:
@Bones said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113881) said:
According to 9 news police are now wanting to speak to Miss whatever her real name is regarding the allegations raised last night.

I hope she cops both barrels if those allegations are proven true. I also hope Josh cops the appropriate punishment if he is found guilty, though I’m starting to suspect he won’t be.

I think they're gonna see this for what it is.

Tell em to grow up and go their seperate ways.

No charges for anyone.

I think she'll get in more trouble now than Josh will. Not because of whatever has happened or didn't happen, that's now irrelevant, but because he has more money and has got more expensive lawyers who have already influenced the media getting his story out.

Right or wrong, he will get off.

Whats she gonna get in trouble for?

Lying about being pregnant?
Asking him for money?
Lying about her name?

Wow... serious crimes.
Throw the book at her.

System isn't designed to take the mans side.

You're right about the system designed to protect the woman, and fair enough too due to the history of women not being protected.

I just mean she'll get in trouble through the media, I can just see this as a shaming thing, her character will continue to be destroyed in the press. Legally nothing much.

Nothing gonna happen mate.
She'll make up a new name and move to Gold Coast...

Pull in some other saps.

Women have options.
She probably doesn't care 1 bit about the outcome.
 
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113915) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113913) said:
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113894) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113893) said:
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113885) said:
@Bones said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113881) said:
According to 9 news police are now wanting to speak to Miss whatever her real name is regarding the allegations raised last night.

I hope she cops both barrels if those allegations are proven true. I also hope Josh cops the appropriate punishment if he is found guilty, though I’m starting to suspect he won’t be.

I think they're gonna see this for what it is.

Tell em to grow up and go their seperate ways.

No charges for anyone.

I think she'll get in more trouble now than Josh will. Not because of whatever has happened or didn't happen, that's now irrelevant, but because he has more money and has got more expensive lawyers who have already influenced the media getting his story out.

Right or wrong, he will get off.

Whats she gonna get in trouble for?

Lying about being pregnant?
Asking him for money?
Lying about her name?

Wow... serious crimes.
Throw the book at her.

System isn't designed to take the mans side.

You're right about the system designed to protect the woman, and fair enough too due to the history of women not being protected.

I just mean she'll get in trouble through the media, I can just see this as a shaming thing, her character will continue to be destroyed in the press. Legally nothing much.

Nothing gonna happen mate.
She'll make up a new name and move to Gold Coast...

Pull in some other saps.

Women have options.
She probably doesn't care 1 bit about the outcome.

Youre probably right. I dont know how to stop some women doing things like this, and I understand we as a society are focusing more on and trying to stop the bigger issue of (hopefully an ever decreasing amount) scum men who abuse women.

Hope Josh picks his acquaintances a bit more carefully in the future, and hope she (if any of this stuff is true) one day has a son (if she doesnt already), and loves him, and sees some woman run him through the wringer and then that experience changes her outlook on her own behaviour.
 
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113894) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113893) said:
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113885) said:
@Bones said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113881) said:
According to 9 news police are now wanting to speak to Miss whatever her real name is regarding the allegations raised last night.

I hope she cops both barrels if those allegations are proven true. I also hope Josh cops the appropriate punishment if he is found guilty, though I’m starting to suspect he won’t be.

I think they're gonna see this for what it is.

Tell em to grow up and go their seperate ways.

No charges for anyone.

I think she'll get in more trouble now than Josh will. Not because of whatever has happened or didn't happen, that's now irrelevant, but because he has more money and has got more expensive lawyers who have already influenced the media getting his story out.

Right or wrong, he will get off.

Whats she gonna get in trouble for?

Lying about being pregnant?
Asking him for money?
Lying about her name?

Wow... serious crimes.
Throw the book at her.

System isn't designed to take the mans side.

Intent to defraud?
Asking for money for situations which clearly don't exist
The fact she has done this before makes her a serial offender

Fraud

**Fraud has been identified as the most expensive crime category in Australia with fraud and deception-related offences believed to be the largest category of all federal offences from all levels of Australian courts**. Estimates indicated that approximately 25 percent of all the fraud cases are actually reported.

This estimate can be attributed to some people believing that fraud is a victimless crime, or that it's not as serious as other crimes. This is not true. Fraudsters are often part of serious organised criminal gangs, who use the money to fund other crimes such as human trafficking, illegal firearms trade or terrorism.

Unfortunately, many frauds go unreported by victims because of personal embarrassment. **It is likely that if a fraud has been committed against you, someone else may have suffered a similar crime. The more individuals who report fraud offences, the more likely it is that fraudsters will be arrested, charged and convicted**.

**Remember that fraud is a crime and that fraudsters will constantly reinvent themselves to find new ways of tricking people**. Anyonecould be a victim

Sounds like this lady doesn't it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top