JT HAS NO CLUE - JUST ASK RANKIN

There is no doubt that there was circumstances that made Rankin go to hooker but did JT go into the game thinking Halatau was playing 80 minutes? Of course not.

It seems that anyone who isn't in JT's future plans moving forward won't be in the team as Cherrington, Farah and Addo-Carr would be in the Top 17 in some people's eye ahead of players such as Rankin, Lovett and Edwards.

Just come out and say it….instead of the spin he used last week that his picking the best 17 to beat the Dragons, well IMO it was spin.
 
@stevetiger said:
@stryker said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
Just a thought. But maybe the fact we didn't beat the Dragons by 50 was evidence that we aren't a better side than what people claim. Again just a thought.

Yeah you're right. Totally unorganised without a proper number 9.

These types of comments stating that we aren't that good a team are funny aren't they.

Im sure non Wests fans would find that comment funny. We're about where we deserve to be. The bottom half of the 8 at best. Our main issue is the same as most teams around us. We don't play for 80 minutes.
 
@foreveratiger said:
There is no doubt that there was circumstances that made Rankin go to hooker but did JT go into the game thinking Halatau was playing 80 minutes? Of course not.

It seems that anyone who isn't in JT's future plans moving forward won't be in the team as Cherrington, Farah and Addo-Carr would be in the Top 17 in some people's eye ahead of players such as Rankin, Lovett and Edwards.

Just come out and say it….instead of the spin he used last week that his picking the best 17 to beat the Dragons, well IMO it was spin.

We actually looked really good in attack in the first half with Halatau at dummy half. But second half it fell away with Rankin and then Halatau who probably ran out of steam.

Our goal line defence was amazing. I just wish our edges would improve. We can get away with it against the lesser teams but we have some big games coming up.
 
@tigerman80 said:
@foreveratiger said:
There is no doubt that there was circumstances that made Rankin go to hooker but did JT go into the game thinking Halatau was playing 80 minutes? Of course not.

It seems that anyone who isn't in JT's future plans moving forward won't be in the team as Cherrington, Farah and Addo-Carr would be in the Top 17 in some people's eye ahead of players such as Rankin, Lovett and Edwards.

Just come out and say it….instead of the spin he used last week that his picking the best 17 to beat the Dragons, well IMO it was spin.

We actually looked really good in attack in the first half with Halatau at dummy half. But second half it fell away with Rankin and then Halatau who probably ran out of steam.

Our goal line defence was amazing. I just wish our edges would improve. We can get away with it against the lesser teams but we have some big games coming up.

Yeah I agree.

I thought Halatau was doing a great job and making good inroads from dummy with his runs. But as you said was always going to run out steam.
 
Taylor either play Farah or just come out and tell the truth about why you're not.

Stop treating everyone as if they're stupid!!!
It's quite clear that he's our best option at 9 and the team functions well with him there, trying to make us believe that playing a guy that's never really been a hooker and is ready for retirement and shuffling in a guy who is borderline NRL quality at 9 and out of positiin is better than playing the NSW hooker and club legend there, you're just making yourself look like a fool and at the same time insulting everyone's intelligence.
 
@Nelson said:
Probably because the plan going in was for Edwards to play hooker but he had to be used cover the injuries to Grant/Lawrence.

Please, don't let common sense ruin another good hate Taylor story!!
 
@magpiecol said:
@Nelson said:
Probably because the plan going in was for Edwards to play hooker but he had to be used cover the injuries to Grant/Lawrence.

Please, don't let common sense ruin another good hate Taylor story!!

I think there is a bit of confusion going on here. Calling out Taylor for something you dont agree with does not mean you hate that person. Taylor either planned to play Rankin at some stage to give Halatau a break, or the plan all along was to rest Halatau with Edwards. So either way the option was to play an untried hooker there (rankin is a winger, edwards is a reggies second rower). Now if you think thats a good decision while your SOO hooker is playing reggies then fine. But if i or others dont agree with it, doesnt mean we are out to get Taylor, we are just calling it for what it is. Same as Lovett playing centre, blind freddy can see that he cant (let 1 try in, bombed another). Play your best team, fix our defence like you promised you would and get us to the semis, thats all we want.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@stevetiger said:
@stryker said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
Just a thought. But maybe the fact we didn't beat the Dragons by 50 was evidence that we aren't a better side than what people claim. Again just a thought.

Yeah you're right. Totally unorganised without a proper number 9.

These types of comments stating that we aren't that good a team are funny aren't they.

Im sure non Wests fans would find that comment funny. We're about where we deserve to be. The bottom half of the 8 at best. Our main issue is the same as most teams around us. We don't play for 80 minutes.

It's funny because the same people that want us to have a dud team and want JT to be the best coach of all time conveniently forget that Robbie (the SOO hooker) is playing reserve grade.
 
@tigerman80 said:
@innsaneink said:
@cqtiger said:
@tigerman80 said:
Oh your right my whole argument goes the down the drain because we have the same points as the dragons but ahead on points differential. Another one who just follows me around, do you and that insane imbecile take in turns lol. Must be a boring life old man.

Why the argument when you were caught out making an inaccurate statement. Check the competition ladder, we are in above the dragons. This is what happens when you post on emotion. Double check what you are going to post before you hit the 'Submit' button.

Not to mention the selective quoting in the OP, the crap about Rankin and hooker, JT losing the shed…blah blah
As they say... Don't let the truth get in the way of a good story... And he has the hide to suggest others have a boring life after his selective quoting.... Hypocrisy of the highest order.

Exposing liars and BS artists like TM80 isn't boring.

Insaneidiot nobody cares what you and your girlfriend GRNLOWLIFE write. You will defend JT in right and wrong no matter what he does. Selective quoting, Rankin clearly states that its a beat up that farah isnt getting enough quality ball to the halves. His words not mine mate lol. Your so called defence guru has us second last in defence or is that also farahs fault. You just sound stupid and morinic when you defend JT no matter what. Lovett at centres please lol, Edwards and Rankin playing hooker please, our right side defence please. Im a tigers supporter and want whats best for my team, your a JT supporter, big difference between us. Your obsession over my posts and JT is revolting, now once again go away.

Love it!!! Where's the positive rep button when you want it :laughing:
 
@tigermac88 said:
@tigerman80 said:
@innsaneink said:
@cqtiger said:
Why the argument when you were caught out making an inaccurate statement. Check the competition ladder, we are in above the dragons. This is what happens when you post on emotion. Double check what you are going to post before you hit the 'Submit' button.

Not to mention the selective quoting in the OP, the crap about Rankin and hooker, JT losing the shed…blah blah
As they say... Don't let the truth get in the way of a good story... And he has the hide to suggest others have a boring life after his selective quoting.... Hypocrisy of the highest order.

Exposing liars and BS artists like TM80 isn't boring.

Insaneidiot nobody cares what you and your girlfriend GRNLOWLIFE write. You will defend JT in right and wrong no matter what he does. Selective quoting, Rankin clearly states that its a beat up that farah isnt getting enough quality ball to the halves. His words not mine mate lol. Your so called defence guru has us second last in defence or is that also farahs fault. You just sound stupid and morinic when you defend JT no matter what. Lovett at centres please lol, Edwards and Rankin playing hooker please, our right side defence please. Im a tigers supporter and want whats best for my team, your a JT supporter, big difference between us. Your obsession over my posts and JT is revolting, now once again go away.

Love it!!! Where's the positive rep button when you want it :laughing:

lol i knew you would. I know ah, i wanted to give myself a positive rating for that post aswell lol.
 
@tigerman80 said:
@tigermac88 said:
@tigerman80 said:
@innsaneink said:
Not to mention the selective quoting in the OP, the crap about Rankin and hooker, JT losing the shed…blah blah
As they say... Don't let the truth get in the way of a good story... And he has the hide to suggest others have a boring life after his selective quoting.... Hypocrisy of the highest order.

Exposing liars and BS artists like TM80 isn't boring.

Insaneidiot nobody cares what you and your girlfriend GRNLOWLIFE write. You will defend JT in right and wrong no matter what he does. Selective quoting, Rankin clearly states that its a beat up that farah isnt getting enough quality ball to the halves. His words not mine mate lol. Your so called defence guru has us second last in defence or is that also farahs fault. You just sound stupid and morinic when you defend JT no matter what. Lovett at centres please lol, Edwards and Rankin playing hooker please, our right side defence please. Im a tigers supporter and want whats best for my team, your a JT supporter, big difference between us. Your obsession over my posts and JT is revolting, now once again go away.

Love it!!! Where's the positive rep button when you want it :laughing:

lol i knew you would. I know ah, i wanted to give myself a positive rating for that post aswell lol.

And there we have it, positive proof you are into self-gratification
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
The more i read TM's posts, the more i'm starting think the 80 in his username represents his IQ.

Shouldnt you and your girlfriends be out playing pokemon go, its obvious you dont have day jobs lol. You cant help yourself either quoting me or dropping my name, sorry im taken lol.
 
@tigerman80 said:
@magpiecol said:
@Nelson said:
Probably because the plan going in was for Edwards to play hooker but he had to be used cover the injuries to Grant/Lawrence.

Please, don't let common sense ruin another good hate Taylor story!!

I think there is a bit of confusion going on here. Calling out Taylor for something you dont agree with does not mean you hate that person. Taylor either planned to play Rankin at some stage to give Halatau a break, or the plan all along was to rest Halatau with Edwards. So either way the option was to play an untried hooker there (rankin is a winger, edwards is a reggies second rower). Now if you think thats a good decision while your SOO hooker is playing reggies then fine. But if i or others dont agree with it, doesnt mean we are out to get Taylor, we are just calling it for what it is. Same as Lovett playing centre, blind freddy can see that he cant (let 1 try in, bombed another). Play your best team, fix our defence like you promised you would and get us to the semis, thats all we want.

Rankin had a fair bit of experience at hooker in the ESL….that's probably whyTaylor had him play at dh when the injuries happened...Rankin is a good utility player,that's why he is in the squad.....
 
@tigerman80 said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
The more i read TM's posts, the more i'm starting think the 80 in his username represents his IQ.

Shouldnt you and your girlfriends be out playing pokemon go, its obvious you dont have day jobs lol. You cant help yourself either quoting me or dropping my name, sorry im taken lol.

This recent "girlfriends" name-calling is pretty dumb.
 
Back on topic…

I'm sure Rankin would be willing to play anywhere as long as he is in first grade, he isn't a worldbeater on the wing anyway. Lovett to centre was duddy though, MCK would offer so much more value off the bench at centre.
 
@Masterton said:
@tigerman80 said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
The more i read TM's posts, the more i'm starting think the 80 in his username represents his IQ.

Shouldnt you and your girlfriends be out playing pokemon go, its obvious you dont have day jobs lol. You cant help yourself either quoting me or dropping my name, sorry im taken lol.

This recent "girlfriends" name-calling is pretty dumb.

Dumb is you putting your 2 cents in where its not required. This whole ganging up thing, where you take it in turns to message probably worked for your guys in the past, but keep it coming. Im allowed to have an opinion, i dont follow people around on here (i hAve a life) and i will give as good as i get. Now go back to your corner little girl.
 
@Milky said:
Back on topic…

I'm sure Rankin would be willing to play anywhere as long as he is in first grade, he isn't a worldbeater on the wing anyway. Lovett to centre was duddy though, MCK would offer so much more value off the bench at centre.

I dont mind Rankin, not the fastest but is pretty consistent especially in defence. he looks better at fullback, and im sure could play anywhere. But if the plan was to use him at hooker then put chee kam on rhe bench.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top