@ said:
@ said:
At least he admitted his failings with the “I was disappointed with the outcome and I think the negotiation took too long. **I put my hand up for that**, because I was the lead negotiator in that process. “ Good CEO's get it done or don't let the negotiations drag on. Jury still out on whether he turns 'distress into good' whatever that means :unamused:
Whilst I agree with you in principal and in a business environment that is 100% correct, negotiations typically shouldn't carry on so long. But can I just ask what your/anyone's response would have been if after 1-3 months of not closing the deal we had of pulled the offer and lost the players then?? Would we have lambasted the board and Pascoe because we didn't give them more time and we can't afford to lose them??
Obviously the players (The Big 4) knew they held all the power in the negotiation and were able to hold out for as long as they saw fit, which is exactly what they did. However when our coaching future was finally confirmed and Cleary came in and took over the reins they started losing that power, Cleary took control and showed in no uncertain terms that they weren't driving the bus, he and the club was.
As much as I am sad to see our club dragged through all of this garbage I feel this could well be a turning point for us and will start pushing us in the right direction finally; I united board, quality CEO, Coach that has ability, respect and has shown he is in charge and finally a well balanced team that will be competitive across the park.
The future looks bright to me!!
I was thinking the same thing. If they'd put the ultimatum down in February instead of April, the season hadn't even started yet, the players would have had far more fan and media support.
The one thing the media circus (of the regular season) has done is tease out the fact that Tigers have been trying to secure their players for a long period and there really isn't much more the club could have done, we appear to have outbid all parties on the Big 3 services.
My theory is that Pascoe got caught between public sentiment and moving the club forward around Feb/17\. If you get frustrated with popular player delays, you can't just shoot them down, public perception will crucify you. You need to build up some public goodwill, build some noise about trying to get the deals done, then make your move. That's exactly what Pascoe did, he made noise in the early rounds about putting a deadline on contracts, but didn't move on that until the new coach was sorted.
So whilst it seems like long delays, I don't see that Pascoe had much choice in trying to keep the Big 4\. We understand that Tigers opened negotiations in the offseason and all 4 players stalled.
Tigers then tried to bring in and lock Webhe around Jan-Feb/17, as a sweetener for the players, and whilst it looked promising it became untenable for the club. First you look to hire Webhe officially, but he's mates with iMoses; you put up with that, then Webhe wants to bring in his specialist masseur… at some point the club realises to make this work they need an army of iMoses lackeys, and iMoses already has enough pull at the club.
They pull the pin on Webhe, the players get shirty and this appears to be around the time they seriously look elsewhere. There does seem a strong current here that there is a power shift and the players / manager start to think their dominant bargaining position is being threatened.
My theory extends: Rounds 2 or 3 The Board are also looking at the coach. After a good win, Tigers are back to old habits. The Big 4 are not signing on, though they appear ok with Jason Taylor, they want to know if he will be around long-term. And fair enough. So the The Board has to ask themselves if JT is the guy to keep moving the club forward, everyone thinks he's a nice and possesses a good footy brain, but does he have the strength and command to pull these players into line, to help every player become a better footballer?
You can be quite sure that Tigers have sounded out Ivan Cleary before the season opened. 3 rounds into the season and JT is gone... I don't see Ivan Cleary to be the type of guy to start discussions and sign a contract within ~2 weeks (the bad losses were only 1 week apart). Remember that JT was appointed in Sep/14 and Pascoe joined in Sep/15\. My theory, a common one, is that Pascoe sounded Ivan out in the offseason, they had a relationship from Penrith, and they talked about Cleary's thoughts and availability.
So you hit mid-March and the top players haven't re-signed, the club has had a few bad losses and is not showing improvement on 2016\. Ivan Cleary agrees that he is interested in the head coach role - but you would need to give him full control over the roster. Despite the good off-season you are seeing repeated patterns of previous years of failure, you have concerns about the players purposefully delaying to push up their price, and they are telling you they want some surety about the long-term coaching strategy. You don't want to make the call on the coach so early in the year but clearly it's becoming an issue for the playing roster.
So you decide - no, JT is probably not the guy capable of taking the team to the next level, we need a cultural shift, we need to bring the contract negotiations to a head and we need a guy with the skills to make this move forward rapidly. We have more money to spend this time around, we need an experienced and roster-building coach. It's only Round 3, you hit the trigger and prepare yourself for the expected media circus.
It happens, it only takes a few weeks to install the new guy, the media can die down about JT. You now go to the Big 4 and say "ok this is our coaching strategy moving forward, we are going to need your decisions soon guys, because we need to look at replacements if you are going".
The Media circus unfortunately does not abate. I think Pascoe misjudged the media here, I am guessing he thought the Cleary appointment would arrest the noise and put more pressure on the players. The players instead played a power game in the media (haven't seen that before hey?) They say they won't be held to deadlines, they just want some surety over the future of the club. They love the club! But they are also clearly looking at other deals, otherwise why delay so long on contracts that have been on the table for months? I think the players and manager are seeing the real power shift here, post Joe Webhe, the club is starting to make plans that don't include the Big 4.
Cleary comes in, the playing roster understandably gets nervous. Cleary already has plans for his roster, he says "not that keen on Mitchell Moses, I want you to revise his priority down, work on getting Brooks signed now, then let's focus on Woods and Tedesco."
mMoses reacts badly, signs elsewhere immediately. It's confirmed that there are deals around, of course there are, but mMoses signed within a few days of his offer revision, so those deals are mature. The noise is that Brooks had the lowest bargaining power of the Big 4, whatever happened between him and the Dogs in 2016 isn't going to happen 2017\. Brooks also appears the strongest agitator to sign up, so that happens rather quickly.
mMoses wants out, Tigers hold him and work on Woods and Tedesco. It's all in black and white now guys: coaching strategy is sorted, the deals are there, you've met Cleary and seen what he is capable of, where the club is headining. You don't need more time and actually we don't have more time to give you. We said there would be a deadline, now our house is in order, here is the deadline.
So that long theory / story being over, I can't see at what point Pascoe could have brought the deadline forward. He probably misjudged the media reaction to the Big 4 contracts, he definitely misjudged how Woods would play this out and I think they were most confident on Tedesco given the huge offer he had, so they misjudged Tedesco's loyalties. But that's all ok, you can't predict people like that, you can only do what you think is right.