Knights Interest In Brooks

[Camel2281]

Fox Sports article this morning has a list of players getting paid overs or unders on their current deal. Listed Luke Brooks as the most overpaid player in Rugby league

 

[Ultimate Warrior]

Fox Sports article this morning has a list of players getting paid overs or unders on their current deal. Listed Luke Brooks as the most overpaid player in Rugby league

1000000000000000000000000000000%

Same percentage applies for the worst player of all time

 

[Swordy]

Fox Sports article this morning has a list of players getting paid overs or unders on their current deal. Listed Luke Brooks as the most overpaid player in Rugby league

Another garbage article by bias idiots. Lets sink the boot into WT a bit more. Agenda? What Agenda...?

Cotric? Mbye? DWZ? All better value for money than Brooks. Puuuhlease.....!

 

[Camel2281]

Fox Sports article this morning has a list of players getting paid overs or unders on their current deal. Listed Luke Brooks as the most overpaid player in Rugby league

Another garbage article by bias idiots. Lets sink the boot into WT a bit more. Agenda? What Agenda...?

Cotric? Mbye? DWZ? All better value for money than Brooks. Puuuhlease.....!

To be fair. Stefano and Laurie were listed as 2nd and 3rd in the players valued at playing for unders so on balance you can't really claim it's an anti Tigers agenda.

What it does highlight is that our roster is still unbalanced between high paid players not providing contract value and some young guys who's output is above their contract value

 

[tig_prmz]

Fox Sports article this morning has a list of players getting paid overs or unders on their current deal. Listed Luke Brooks as the most overpaid player in Rugby league

Another garbage article by bias idiots. Lets sink the boot into WT a bit more. Agenda? What Agenda...?

Cotric? Mbye? DWZ? All better value for money than Brooks. Puuuhlease.....!

To be fair. Stefano and Laurie were listed as 2nd and 3rd in the players valued at playing for unders so on balance you can't really claim it's an anti Tigers agenda.

What it does highlight is that our roster is still unbalanced between high paid players not providing contract value and some young guys who's output is above their contract value

That's how it is in many rosters.

 

[Swordy]

Fox Sports article this morning has a list of players getting paid overs or unders on their current deal. Listed Luke Brooks as the most overpaid player in Rugby league

Another garbage article by bias idiots. Lets sink the boot into WT a bit more. Agenda? What Agenda...?

Cotric? Mbye? DWZ? All better value for money than Brooks. Puuuhlease.....!

To be fair. Stefano and Laurie were listed as 2nd and 3rd in the players valued at playing for unders so on balance you can't really claim it's an anti Tigers agenda.

What it does highlight is that our roster is still unbalanced between high paid players not providing contract value and some young guys who's output is above their contract value

That's true, and they are undervalued. If I was paranoid, then I'd suggest they also did that deliberately, which will force the club to go in and sign them up quickly as they fight to retain them, which drives their price higher (potentially unreasonably).

I'm just annoyed that there isn't an adjoining story about how the Knights want to purchase a seriously overpaid player - allegedly.

 

[hammertime]

Fox Sports article this morning has a list of players getting paid overs or unders on their current deal. Listed Luke Brooks as the most overpaid player in Rugby league

Another garbage article by bias idiots. Lets sink the boot into WT a bit more. Agenda? What Agenda...?

Cotric? Mbye? DWZ? All better value for money than Brooks. Puuuhlease.....!

To be fair. Stefano and Laurie were listed as 2nd and 3rd in the players valued at playing for unders so on balance you can't really claim it's an anti Tigers agenda.

What it does highlight is that our roster is still unbalanced between high paid players not providing contract value and some young guys who's output is above their contract value

Actually, still can be. Putting players at top of either list will create disruption. Sounds like we have massive over representation there.

 

[TigerSJ]

The same is going on in nearly every club. We just get more than our fair share of spotlight for whatever reason. If you were inclined to you could push these type of negative narratives and write the same stories about every club. I’m sure that at some clubs the stuff going on is worse than at WTs.

 

[Newtown]

The same is going on in nearly every club. We just get more than our fair share of spotlight for whatever reason. If you were inclined to you could push these type of negative narratives and write the same stories about every club. I’m sure that at some clubs the stuff going on is worse than at WTs.

We are always in the spotlight because the journalists depend on reading the Wests Tigers forum for their news articles.

 

[Jedi_Tiger]

Fox Sports article this morning has a list of players getting paid overs or unders on their current deal. Listed Luke Brooks as the most overpaid player in Rugby league

another push for the Tigers from the media to let Brooks go to Newcastle
stand firm he is not going anywhere

 

[Harvey]

Fox Sports article this morning has a list of players getting paid overs or unders on their current deal. Listed Luke Brooks as the most overpaid player in Rugby league

Another garbage article by bias idiots. Lets sink the boot into WT a bit more. Agenda? What Agenda...?

Cotric? Mbye? DWZ? All better value for money than Brooks. Puuuhlease.....!

To be fair. Stefano and Laurie were listed as 2nd and 3rd in the players valued at playing for unders so on balance you can't really claim it's an anti Tigers agenda.

What it does highlight is that our roster is still unbalanced between high paid players not providing contract value and some young guys who's output is above their contract value

Gets those players seeking upgrades and kicking stones

 

[Tiger5150]

Fox Sports article this morning has a list of players getting paid overs or unders on their current deal. Listed Luke Brooks as the most overpaid player in Rugby league

Ben hunt has retired?

 

[Tiger-ferret]

Fox Sports article this morning has a list of players getting paid overs or unders on their current deal. Listed Luke Brooks as the most overpaid player in Rugby league

Another garbage article by bias idiots. Lets sink the boot into WT a bit more. Agenda? What Agenda...?

Cotric? Mbye? DWZ? All better value for money than Brooks. Puuuhlease.....!

To be fair. Stefano and Laurie were listed as 2nd and 3rd in the players valued at playing for unders so on balance you can't really claim it's an anti Tigers agenda.

What it does highlight is that our roster is still unbalanced between high paid players not providing contract value and some young guys who's output is above their contract value

I’m skeptical. It’s all opinion and it’s coincidence we have players listed at the pointy end of both lists.

 

[crazycat]

The knights must pay overs for Brooks, but something has to change.

Attack wise we dont have much change this season.

We have two wingers who are pretty powerful, i dont think were the best club but we have people who can score.
We blew our cap on Centers, but really were getting similar performance this year particularly if Doueini moves to 3-4.

The only change is Hastings in for BJ Leilua. Sure an Improvement but it will take ages for that Combo to Gel.