OFFICIAL Lachlan Galvin #277 *Released* Career Discussion.

This saga has taught me that the club still has no money to compete with the top clubs.

Reading between the lines Richo wanted to stand his ground but Moses came at the club with a lawsuit that the club can't afford to deal with so they are forced to provide a very low transfer fee to protect the club from being sued.

This is full of assumptions but those close to the club seem to be indicating this is close to the truth.
 
This saga has taught me that the club still has no money to compete with the top clubs.

Reading between the lines Richo wanted to stand his ground but Moses came at the club with a lawsuit that the club can't afford to deal with so they are forced to provide a very low transfer fee to protect the club from being sued.

This is full of assumptions but those close to the club seem to be indicating this is close to the truth.

Another possibility is that the club thought the bullying claims had some merit …
 
Another possibility is that the club thought the bullying claims had some merit …
James Hooper has come out saying that the club didnt want this info to be in the public forum.

So there's something to it...

Whether it's standard practice in rugby league (aka it's not that bad in footy circles) but would be something the woke media would choose to ride - I guess we will never know.

If there's someone in the know , I'd appreciate a PM to understand this more
 

Lachlan Galvin’s bombshell move hinges on one contract clause​


Lachlan Galvin’s blockbuster switch to an NRL rival has been locked in, but one contract clause could see it come tumbling down.

According to Code Sports, the teenager’s drawn out contract saga has come to an end as he puts pen to paper on a contract until the end of the 2028 season.

It will now see him make an immediate move and join his new club this week with his salary reportedly set to see him earn $750,000 per-season.

The blockbuster move however hinges on one major stipulation within his release from the Tigers … a non-disparagement clause.

That clause would legally stop Galvin from discussing the situation surrounding his exit from the merger club and the Bulldogs are reportedly supportive of the Tigers’ demands.

Canterbury will reportedly pay a $175,000 release fee to secure the rising star’s services.

Galvin’s move comes as Bulldogs supremo Phil Gould finds himself in the spotlight after he was accused of deliberately misleading fans.

The switch confirmed rumours that the Bulldogs’ general manager of football had been working behind the scenes to negotiate a deal to lure Galvin from the Tigers.

The 67-year-old had batted his eyelids at the young playmaker with glowing public comments about his abilities for months, but repeatedly insisted the club had no interest in signing him.

And even after that was proven untrue, Gould claimed he had nothing to do with the signing of the talented teenager.

“I never said we weren’t interested (in Galvin). What I said was we’re on a different course because he wasn’t off contract until 2027,” Gould said on Monday night. “We couldn’t talk to him until November.”

But veteran journalist Phil Rothfield believes the latest incident has severely damaged his credibility with both fans and the network.

“I reckon he’s been seriously damaged credibility wise and his reputation has been severely damaged at Channel 9 over this,” Rothfield said on the Off the Record podcast.

“I think the punters are awake to it and they are the lifeblood of every TV network that provides the ratings. I honestly think he’s been badly damaged and people won’t cop his bullsh** anymore.”

While speaking on Triple Ms daily NRL podcast on Tuesday, Rothfield added: “He gets away with so much rubbish and has for years but he’s been caught on the hop here and in my view, he has misled Channel 9 viewers for some time about Lachlan Galvin.

“Rugby league officials do lie and it’s a fact we have to live with but when you are being paid nearly $1 million to sit on a (TV) panel, you are there to inform and say the truth. But this is where Gus gets himself into an awkward situation. As a viewer, he hasn’t been upfront with us.”

Rothfield also noted that what Gould says and what is true are often two very different things.

“Gus was talking his usual crap about not knowing this, not knowing that and trying to cover himself and I don’t think he did a very good job at it,” Rothfield continued about Gould’s 100% Footy appearance on the Off the Record podcast.

“When he says so clearly that Lachlan Galvin is not on our radar, if you’re not on the radar and if the goalposts move you’re still not on the radar. This crap about that he’s the best kid he’s ever seen is also so disrespectful to (Brad) Fittler, (Laurie) Daley and these guys.

“He said Bryce Cartwright will be the best forward the game’s ever seen. He said that in recruitment meetings at Penrith. Then he sent him to the Titans. “He said Matt Moylan in 2016 was the future of Penrith and would be a lifetime member here. Next year he sold him to Cronulla.”

However, whether deliberately or not, several of Gould’s claims have ended up not being accurate over the last 12 months.

Late last year Gould denied the Bulldogs were interested in Knights forward Leo Thompson only for Kiwi international to pen a four-year deal with Canterbury in January.

Gould also denied reports that he’d signed Sitili Tupouniua last year only for the club to confirm a four-year deal a week later. (MSN)
 
James Hooper has come out saying that the club didnt want this info to be in the public forum.

So there's something to it...

Whether it's standard practice in rugby league (aka it's not that bad in footy circles) but would be something the woke media would choose to ride - I guess we will never know.

If there's someone in the know , I'd appreciate a PM to understand this more
You never want claims of employees being treated poorly to circulate. Even if they are false.
There are certain instances where mud sticks..this is among them.
 
You never want claims of employees being treated poorly to circulate. Even if they are false.
There are certain instances where mud sticks..this is among them.
Whether it’s true or not , when you’re looking to build your roster , and promote a winning culture this is just yuck .
I mean it could also be to protect Galvin as well . As if the rumours are true with some of the things he’s said and done , there’s no way he’s coming out of media war looking real crash hit either .
 

Lachlan Galvin’s bombshell move hinges on one contract clause​


Lachlan Galvin’s blockbuster switch to an NRL rival has been locked in, but one contract clause could see it come tumbling down.

According to Code Sports, the teenager’s drawn out contract saga has come to an end as he puts pen to paper on a contract until the end of the 2028 season.

It will now see him make an immediate move and join his new club this week with his salary reportedly set to see him earn $750,000 per-season.

The blockbuster move however hinges on one major stipulation within his release from the Tigers … a non-disparagement clause.

That clause would legally stop Galvin from discussing the situation surrounding his exit from the merger club and the Bulldogs are reportedly supportive of the Tigers’ demands.

Canterbury will reportedly pay a $175,000 release fee to secure the rising star’s services.

Galvin’s move comes as Bulldogs supremo Phil Gould finds himself in the spotlight after he was accused of deliberately misleading fans.

The switch confirmed rumours that the Bulldogs’ general manager of football had been working behind the scenes to negotiate a deal to lure Galvin from the Tigers.

The 67-year-old had batted his eyelids at the young playmaker with glowing public comments about his abilities for months, but repeatedly insisted the club had no interest in signing him.

And even after that was proven untrue, Gould claimed he had nothing to do with the signing of the talented teenager.

“I never said we weren’t interested (in Galvin). What I said was we’re on a different course because he wasn’t off contract until 2027,” Gould said on Monday night. “We couldn’t talk to him until November.”

But veteran journalist Phil Rothfield believes the latest incident has severely damaged his credibility with both fans and the network.

“I reckon he’s been seriously damaged credibility wise and his reputation has been severely damaged at Channel 9 over this,” Rothfield said on the Off the Record podcast.

“I think the punters are awake to it and they are the lifeblood of every TV network that provides the ratings. I honestly think he’s been badly damaged and people won’t cop his bullsh** anymore.”

While speaking on Triple Ms daily NRL podcast on Tuesday, Rothfield added: “He gets away with so much rubbish and has for years but he’s been caught on the hop here and in my view, he has misled Channel 9 viewers for some time about Lachlan Galvin.

“Rugby league officials do lie and it’s a fact we have to live with but when you are being paid nearly $1 million to sit on a (TV) panel, you are there to inform and say the truth. But this is where Gus gets himself into an awkward situation. As a viewer, he hasn’t been upfront with us.”

Rothfield also noted that what Gould says and what is true are often two very different things.

“Gus was talking his usual crap about not knowing this, not knowing that and trying to cover himself and I don’t think he did a very good job at it,” Rothfield continued about Gould’s 100% Footy appearance on the Off the Record podcast.

“When he says so clearly that Lachlan Galvin is not on our radar, if you’re not on the radar and if the goalposts move you’re still not on the radar. This crap about that he’s the best kid he’s ever seen is also so disrespectful to (Brad) Fittler, (Laurie) Daley and these guys.

“He said Bryce Cartwright will be the best forward the game’s ever seen. He said that in recruitment meetings at Penrith. Then he sent him to the Titans. “He said Matt Moylan in 2016 was the future of Penrith and would be a lifetime member here. Next year he sold him to Cronulla.”

However, whether deliberately or not, several of Gould’s claims have ended up not being accurate over the last 12 months.

Late last year Gould denied the Bulldogs were interested in Knights forward Leo Thompson only for Kiwi international to pen a four-year deal with Canterbury in January.

Gould also denied reports that he’d signed Sitili Tupouniua last year only for the club to confirm a four-year deal a week later. (MSN)
The plot thickens
 
Fox and Buzz's obsession with Gould is sickening.. until now.. now, it's hillarious.

More drama please.. (as long as it has nothing to do with us)
 
It isn’t. That clause is apparently the hold up.
So they obviously still want to pursue the club after he leaves.

Its obviously a non negotiable for the tigers.. only way he leaves is to agree on the terms.. or play out the remaining days in NSW cup and fight the legal battle
 
It isn’t. That clause is apparently the hold up.
Sounds like we have the upper hand here. Double the size of the transfer fee while they agree to the deal. Also I’d be leveraging clear cut player tampering here for a player that was not able to speak with other clubs until November 1. The bullying claims are noted but irrelevant it seems as Canterbury clearly want him immediately. If that is the case, make them beg.
 
I’ve had a theory that our culture change required a bit of a hardline stance. Guys like Noffa, Jordan Miller etc. leaving is the evidence that supports my theory. Wouldn’t be surprised if a few guys viewed this as bullying and the club is hell bent on maintaining these standards.

No surprise the Bulldogs also support us.
 

Staff online

Members online

Back
Top