OFFICIAL Lachlan Galvin #277 *Released* Career Discussion.

Maybe because they were all only just out of nappies the last time we made the finals and all theyve seen from WTs is disaster after disaster

I hear ya when you say stick together work hard to achieve something special but it seems this generation want everything now
Society values have changed a lot from last century it is now more me first unfortunately.
Think the club needs someone with the role to look over the junior grades that can sniff out the talented but loyal kids not much point in keeping ones that show signs of using the club up, not an easy task that's for sure, won't be applying for the job too F hard lol.
 
Galvin has great fitness and enthusiasm and that impossible to coach instinct to throw the cut out ball or to take the player on at the right time. He is far more assured than Brooks ever was. Even out of form this year, he's a lot better than Brooks just in his willingness to take the game on.

It's a messy transition to the Dogs, but, like many players who leave us, I think it will work out well for him at the Dogs as much as that pains us.

We rarely have the momentum in games and it's hard for halves to look good in that situation. It will be interesting to see how he goes at the Dogs. I agree with most here that he's more a second rower/ 5/8 type than a halfback, but we'll see.

I just wouldn't be getting hopes up about it all not working. It was lovely to see it happen with Woods, but I don't think it happens like that for Galvin.
Yep spot on
We rarely had momentum...thats what ive been saying for a while...wondering how hed go with a great pack laying a platforms
 
This saga has taught me that the club still has no money to compete with the top clubs.

Reading between the lines Richo wanted to stand his ground but Moses came at the club with a lawsuit that the club can't afford to deal with so they are forced to provide a very low transfer fee to protect the club from being sued.

This is full of assumptions but those close to the club seem to be indicating this is close to the truth.
 
Can you expand on this
Just from the interviews where douhei and may sounded like they were somewhat supportive of him... But then you hear from different circles how bad the relationship is with Luai..
Or is it simply a Galvin and Luai problem?
 
This saga has taught me that the club still has no money to compete with the top clubs.

Reading between the lines Richo wanted to stand his ground but Moses came at the club with a lawsuit that the club can't afford to deal with so they are forced to provide a very low transfer fee to protect the club from being sued.

This is full of assumptions but those close to the club seem to be indicating this is close to the truth.

Another possibility is that the club thought the bullying claims had some merit …
 
Another possibility is that the club thought the bullying claims had some merit …
James Hooper has come out saying that the club didnt want this info to be in the public forum.

So there's something to it...

Whether it's standard practice in rugby league (aka it's not that bad in footy circles) but would be something the woke media would choose to ride - I guess we will never know.

If there's someone in the know , I'd appreciate a PM to understand this more
 

Lachlan Galvin’s bombshell move hinges on one contract clause​


Lachlan Galvin’s blockbuster switch to an NRL rival has been locked in, but one contract clause could see it come tumbling down.

According to Code Sports, the teenager’s drawn out contract saga has come to an end as he puts pen to paper on a contract until the end of the 2028 season.

It will now see him make an immediate move and join his new club this week with his salary reportedly set to see him earn $750,000 per-season.

The blockbuster move however hinges on one major stipulation within his release from the Tigers … a non-disparagement clause.

That clause would legally stop Galvin from discussing the situation surrounding his exit from the merger club and the Bulldogs are reportedly supportive of the Tigers’ demands.

Canterbury will reportedly pay a $175,000 release fee to secure the rising star’s services.

Galvin’s move comes as Bulldogs supremo Phil Gould finds himself in the spotlight after he was accused of deliberately misleading fans.

The switch confirmed rumours that the Bulldogs’ general manager of football had been working behind the scenes to negotiate a deal to lure Galvin from the Tigers.

The 67-year-old had batted his eyelids at the young playmaker with glowing public comments about his abilities for months, but repeatedly insisted the club had no interest in signing him.

And even after that was proven untrue, Gould claimed he had nothing to do with the signing of the talented teenager.

“I never said we weren’t interested (in Galvin). What I said was we’re on a different course because he wasn’t off contract until 2027,” Gould said on Monday night. “We couldn’t talk to him until November.”

But veteran journalist Phil Rothfield believes the latest incident has severely damaged his credibility with both fans and the network.

“I reckon he’s been seriously damaged credibility wise and his reputation has been severely damaged at Channel 9 over this,” Rothfield said on the Off the Record podcast.

“I think the punters are awake to it and they are the lifeblood of every TV network that provides the ratings. I honestly think he’s been badly damaged and people won’t cop his bullsh** anymore.”

While speaking on Triple Ms daily NRL podcast on Tuesday, Rothfield added: “He gets away with so much rubbish and has for years but he’s been caught on the hop here and in my view, he has misled Channel 9 viewers for some time about Lachlan Galvin.

“Rugby league officials do lie and it’s a fact we have to live with but when you are being paid nearly $1 million to sit on a (TV) panel, you are there to inform and say the truth. But this is where Gus gets himself into an awkward situation. As a viewer, he hasn’t been upfront with us.”

Rothfield also noted that what Gould says and what is true are often two very different things.

“Gus was talking his usual crap about not knowing this, not knowing that and trying to cover himself and I don’t think he did a very good job at it,” Rothfield continued about Gould’s 100% Footy appearance on the Off the Record podcast.

“When he says so clearly that Lachlan Galvin is not on our radar, if you’re not on the radar and if the goalposts move you’re still not on the radar. This crap about that he’s the best kid he’s ever seen is also so disrespectful to (Brad) Fittler, (Laurie) Daley and these guys.

“He said Bryce Cartwright will be the best forward the game’s ever seen. He said that in recruitment meetings at Penrith. Then he sent him to the Titans. “He said Matt Moylan in 2016 was the future of Penrith and would be a lifetime member here. Next year he sold him to Cronulla.”

However, whether deliberately or not, several of Gould’s claims have ended up not being accurate over the last 12 months.

Late last year Gould denied the Bulldogs were interested in Knights forward Leo Thompson only for Kiwi international to pen a four-year deal with Canterbury in January.

Gould also denied reports that he’d signed Sitili Tupouniua last year only for the club to confirm a four-year deal a week later. (MSN)
 
James Hooper has come out saying that the club didnt want this info to be in the public forum.

So there's something to it...

Whether it's standard practice in rugby league (aka it's not that bad in footy circles) but would be something the woke media would choose to ride - I guess we will never know.

If there's someone in the know , I'd appreciate a PM to understand this more
You never want claims of employees being treated poorly to circulate. Even if they are false.
There are certain instances where mud sticks..this is among them.
 
You never want claims of employees being treated poorly to circulate. Even if they are false.
There are certain instances where mud sticks..this is among them.
Whether it’s true or not , when you’re looking to build your roster , and promote a winning culture this is just yuck .
I mean it could also be to protect Galvin as well . As if the rumours are true with some of the things he’s said and done , there’s no way he’s coming out of media war looking real crash hit either .
 

Lachlan Galvin’s bombshell move hinges on one contract clause​


Lachlan Galvin’s blockbuster switch to an NRL rival has been locked in, but one contract clause could see it come tumbling down.

According to Code Sports, the teenager’s drawn out contract saga has come to an end as he puts pen to paper on a contract until the end of the 2028 season.

It will now see him make an immediate move and join his new club this week with his salary reportedly set to see him earn $750,000 per-season.

The blockbuster move however hinges on one major stipulation within his release from the Tigers … a non-disparagement clause.

That clause would legally stop Galvin from discussing the situation surrounding his exit from the merger club and the Bulldogs are reportedly supportive of the Tigers’ demands.

Canterbury will reportedly pay a $175,000 release fee to secure the rising star’s services.

Galvin’s move comes as Bulldogs supremo Phil Gould finds himself in the spotlight after he was accused of deliberately misleading fans.

The switch confirmed rumours that the Bulldogs’ general manager of football had been working behind the scenes to negotiate a deal to lure Galvin from the Tigers.

The 67-year-old had batted his eyelids at the young playmaker with glowing public comments about his abilities for months, but repeatedly insisted the club had no interest in signing him.

And even after that was proven untrue, Gould claimed he had nothing to do with the signing of the talented teenager.

“I never said we weren’t interested (in Galvin). What I said was we’re on a different course because he wasn’t off contract until 2027,” Gould said on Monday night. “We couldn’t talk to him until November.”

But veteran journalist Phil Rothfield believes the latest incident has severely damaged his credibility with both fans and the network.

“I reckon he’s been seriously damaged credibility wise and his reputation has been severely damaged at Channel 9 over this,” Rothfield said on the Off the Record podcast.

“I think the punters are awake to it and they are the lifeblood of every TV network that provides the ratings. I honestly think he’s been badly damaged and people won’t cop his bullsh** anymore.”

While speaking on Triple Ms daily NRL podcast on Tuesday, Rothfield added: “He gets away with so much rubbish and has for years but he’s been caught on the hop here and in my view, he has misled Channel 9 viewers for some time about Lachlan Galvin.

“Rugby league officials do lie and it’s a fact we have to live with but when you are being paid nearly $1 million to sit on a (TV) panel, you are there to inform and say the truth. But this is where Gus gets himself into an awkward situation. As a viewer, he hasn’t been upfront with us.”

Rothfield also noted that what Gould says and what is true are often two very different things.

“Gus was talking his usual crap about not knowing this, not knowing that and trying to cover himself and I don’t think he did a very good job at it,” Rothfield continued about Gould’s 100% Footy appearance on the Off the Record podcast.

“When he says so clearly that Lachlan Galvin is not on our radar, if you’re not on the radar and if the goalposts move you’re still not on the radar. This crap about that he’s the best kid he’s ever seen is also so disrespectful to (Brad) Fittler, (Laurie) Daley and these guys.

“He said Bryce Cartwright will be the best forward the game’s ever seen. He said that in recruitment meetings at Penrith. Then he sent him to the Titans. “He said Matt Moylan in 2016 was the future of Penrith and would be a lifetime member here. Next year he sold him to Cronulla.”

However, whether deliberately or not, several of Gould’s claims have ended up not being accurate over the last 12 months.

Late last year Gould denied the Bulldogs were interested in Knights forward Leo Thompson only for Kiwi international to pen a four-year deal with Canterbury in January.

Gould also denied reports that he’d signed Sitili Tupouniua last year only for the club to confirm a four-year deal a week later. (MSN)
The plot thickens
 
Fox and Buzz's obsession with Gould is sickening.. until now.. now, it's hillarious.

More drama please.. (as long as it has nothing to do with us)
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top