@Swordy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083812) said:
Not a fan, never will be with his attitude.
As a player and a person, seems to want everything given to him with little effort. if he was better than that, Roosters would be trying harder, its that simple.
Amazing
But pretty much on the mark.
How so? He’s an absolutely fabulous player who wants to play fullback. He’s making an enormous decision regarding his future and it’s his right to do whatever he has to in order to secure his and his families future. If we miss out on Mitchell it isn’t his fault.
Mitchell appears to me to be a 22 year old guy under intense media scrutiny who is trying to make the best decision he can. The negative comments about him on this forum are completely without merit and unwarranted. I can’t recall him publicly saying anything about the roosters or anyone else in a negative way.
Some of our club legends could learn a thing or two..
OK - I had my two cents worth - now your having yours.
1 It was said at one million dollars he was cheap. I said I didn't think one million is cheap...not saying what he was worth but saying one million is not cheap. Is it Avo? To my mind one million is not cheap for anything.
2 I have pretty much stayed out of this fiasco because I don't really care if we sign him or not. If pushed I would lean to not. LM may well turn out to be the best FB the game has ever seen or he may well be a big dud as a FB - only time will tell. It is whether one is willing to take a risk or not - obviously the Tigers are willing to take that risk. If they sign him I am not going to give up my membership or go and sob in my pillow.
3 I am saying (I will spell it out) If it was me I would not sign him because of the risk. He does appear to me also to want everything - he is an untried FB for that cost, yes he has played there but.... at the moment is he as good as Teddy or Turbo - I don't think so but he still wants the same money. Will he be able to organise a teams defence? untried again. I also don't like his on field attitude and how he fades in and out of games (million $ players do not do that), snaps far too often and gives penalties away too easily. Also that game he played for Australia wasn't bad, it was diabolical.
4 SO, I am sure you and others will not agree with anything I have said, that is fair enough, you and others are entitled to your opinion as well.This is a Forum and everyone is entitled without being strung up or am I on the wrong tack here.
5 Personally I don't think he has anything to teach any Tigers Legends (i.e. Farah, Benji and Rowdy, don't think we could include anyone else) - however I do think he could probably spend the rest of his life learning off them.
6 As far as his signing goes - it is just ridiculous all these scenarios people are coming up with. He could be signed to us, someone else or nobody at this stage - only time will tell. I am proud of the club which has so far produced NO leaks, and the professional way it is being run currently.
Hi Russell - I understand there is a risk to his signing (there is a risk to every signing) but he has more ability than anyone in our team by a considerable margin. $1m is a lot, no question about it, but that's the going rate for a marquee player and it will be fantastic for the overall perception of the club. Greg Inglis wasn't a fullback before he went to Souths and that turned out ok didnt it? It also brought more high profile players to the club.
As for the club legends comment, can't recall Mitchell going to the media to complain about his contract in the week leading up to the biggest game in years... Rowdy did, to Danny Weidler no less. Perhaps Rowdy could learn a thing or two from Mitchell.