Tim Sheens
Well-known member
@jirskyr said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091816) said:Lastly, if we actually quote Pascoe verbatim:
“We publicly withdrew our offer to Latrell… we’ve had no further converation with Latrell through that period.”; and
“We have no offer on the table for Latrell at this point.”
If he’s intending to be technical, note that Pascoe did not emphatically rule out whether or not Tigers would sign or are interesting in signing Latrell. I’m not speculating, I’m just noting what he literally said.
For example, if Pascoe had talked to Latrell’s manager, not Latrell, and the deal was signed yesterday, then both the things he said are true - he didn’t have a conversation with Latrell and there is no offer on the table, because the offer has been taken up.
Yeah, I also noticed there were openings in what he said and/or didn't say, though nothing that made me have any certainty. Though not too dissimilar, still different enough from the traitor's speech last year, when instantly it was plain as day, well for me anyway, that he was gone.