finnzo
Well-known member
It’s all just media rubbish trying to get as much out of this as they can There off there bloody heads haha
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@tigerbalm said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081906) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081888) said:@swag_tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081885) said:@Newtown he waits to see what happens in relation to the South Sydney situation.
What do you mean what happens? The Roosters won't release him to Souths . Stop being scared of this club succeeding.
Hows that being scared of the club succeeding? I can't even do the mental math on how you got to that. Do you get enjoyment from these passive aggressive digs at people? you get we all support the same team right?
Can you link me to the article that clearly states with quotes that the roosters will not release LM to Souths? I cant seem to find it. I can find ones where Souths say they're not interested but we all know how that goes. Even if! Roosters management lost their mind and said they wont release him to souths. What are they going to do for 2020? the talk of playing him for Norths is rubbish (see judas materson) and they would be paying a substantial chunk of the cap for that. Plus, could you imagine the bad press they'd cop? no way that happens.
Its a reality that a club like Souths would be of interest to a player with LM's cultural background. what is unknown is if he would be interested in being the next GI or Souths want him.
@GNR4LIFE said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081915) said:@tigerbalm said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081906) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081888) said:@swag_tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081885) said:@Newtown he waits to see what happens in relation to the South Sydney situation.
What do you mean what happens? The Roosters won't release him to Souths . Stop being scared of this club succeeding.
Hows that being scared of the club succeeding? I can't even do the mental math on how you got to that. Do you get enjoyment from these passive aggressive digs at people? you get we all support the same team right?
Can you link me to the article that clearly states with quotes that the roosters will not release LM to Souths? I cant seem to find it. I can find ones where Souths say they're not interested but we all know how that goes. Even if! Roosters management lost their mind and said they wont release him to souths. What are they going to do for 2020? the talk of playing him for Norths is rubbish (see judas materson) and they would be paying a substantial chunk of the cap for that. Plus, could you imagine the bad press they'd cop? no way that happens.
Its a reality that a club like Souths would be of interest to a player with LM's cultural background. what is unknown is if he would be interested in being the next GI or Souths want him.
I got to that by certain posters finding every excuse in the book about why this is going to backfire, based on very little, other than ''its taking too long''. Too long meaning 3 weeks.
And there was an article on the Roosters not wanting to release him to Souths. There were no quotes from the Roosters, but if you think about it, it makes sense. Why release him to a club that has the potential to make them serious premiership contenders. Releasing him to us would give us a boost, but it wouldn't make us a premiership threat.
Anyway, you say I'm speculating about the Roosters without quotes, but you're speculating about Souths interest without any quotes. Glass houses.
@tigerbalm said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081931) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081915) said:@tigerbalm said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081906) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081888) said:@swag_tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081885) said:@Newtown he waits to see what happens in relation to the South Sydney situation.
What do you mean what happens? The Roosters won't release him to Souths . Stop being scared of this club succeeding.
Hows that being scared of the club succeeding? I can't even do the mental math on how you got to that. Do you get enjoyment from these passive aggressive digs at people? you get we all support the same team right?
Can you link me to the article that clearly states with quotes that the roosters will not release LM to Souths? I cant seem to find it. I can find ones where Souths say they're not interested but we all know how that goes. Even if! Roosters management lost their mind and said they wont release him to souths. What are they going to do for 2020? the talk of playing him for Norths is rubbish (see judas materson) and they would be paying a substantial chunk of the cap for that. Plus, could you imagine the bad press they'd cop? no way that happens.
Its a reality that a club like Souths would be of interest to a player with LM's cultural background. what is unknown is if he would be interested in being the next GI or Souths want him.
I got to that by certain posters finding every excuse in the book about why this is going to backfire, based on very little, other than ''its taking too long''. Too long meaning 3 weeks.
And there was an article on the Roosters not wanting to release him to Souths. There were no quotes from the Roosters, but if you think about it, it makes sense. Why release him to a club that has the potential to make them serious premiership contenders. Releasing him to us would give us a boost, but it wouldn't make us a premiership threat.
Anyway, you say I'm speculating about the Roosters without quotes, but you're speculating about Souths interest without any quotes. Glass houses.
Any club could be a title contender, that makes no sense at all. Who had the Raiders penned in for a close battle in the GF at the start of the year??? so no.
My guess is the story was a fabrication based on some historical rivalry and a lot of poetic licence from the writer. People just swallowed it and created this whole story line.
As for joining Souths, what we do know is LM is an ambassador for a few aboriginal health organizations, huge supporter of bush footy and I'm sure a bunch more we don't know about.
Its not a leap to picturing him wanting to be with a club like Souths with their ties to the aboriginal community, grab an iconic No.1 position.
You stated as fact, roosters will not release him to Souths based on absolutely nothing and then had a little dig to the poster for not knowing or believing the fact you stated, again, based on nothing. Pet hate of mine is how modern media is consumed, regurgitated as fact and people create sides from it.
Anyways, rant over, as you were.
@barra said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081851) said:@Needaname said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081814) said:Guys it’s obvious.
The roosters are working feverishly away at the moment to transfer Latrells $300,000 third party agreement to another player so that at the time of his release his full pay is listed on the cap at ‘full pay’ for $750,000. haven’t you all seen this been done before. Cough, Mitchell Pearce, Cooper Cronk!
Yeah, I remember them talking down Cronks contract fee when there was speculation about how they were affording to fit him under the cap - then we he retires they suddenly have freed up money from the million dollar player!!!
@tigerbalm said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081950) said:@GNR4LIFE
I'm am speculating, not stating as fact and especially not jumping on someone for not believing my speculation.
You see the difference right? (honest question).
@TillLindemann said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081954) said:@tigerbalm The point isn't whether Souths are interested or not, it's that the Roosters won't release him to Souths.
So their interest would be irrelevant.
@TillLindemann said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1081954) said:@tigerbalm The point isn't whether Souths are interested or not, it's that the Roosters won't release him to Souths.
So their interest would be irrelevant.