**live game feed** vs the Dogs

I might be on the wrong track here but to me, this game should be a litmus test for Maguire. We just played the absolute dead bottom floor team of the comp and fluffed it. It wasn't as if our opponents were putting us under pressure.
For Maguire, it should stand out like the proverbial which players are contributors and which are passengers or otherwise not up to standard.
 
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439446) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439411) said:
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439404) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439389) said:
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439373) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439315) said:
The other myths in our team are liddle and brooks. Liddle has gone backwards so dramatically. Did he run once from dummy half today?

No, because as you said the dogs were lying all over us in the ruck and not allowing anything quick.

Doesn’t mean your number 9 doesn’t run the ball when the opportunity arises. Ruck speed doesn’t affect our half dropping the ball cold, passing it forward and showing absolutely no game management whatsoever. Enlighten us with your thoughts on how liddle and brooks played today????

Yes it does.

They (Brooks, Liddle) played scrappy. It was clunky affair. There was a whole lack of time given to our ball players by how much time the Dogs were taking away from us at the ruck.

Our attack was good with the runners with the ball. But broke down from the tackle, play the ball and the pass.

We are now with (Garner being injured) the most inexperienced forward pack in the game. It’s to be expected. But improvement is very much needed.

We are now without garner a much better team with Blore playing more minutes and missing zero tackles.

@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439404) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439389) said:
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439373) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439315) said:
The other myths in our team are liddle and brooks. Liddle has gone backwards so dramatically. Did he run once from dummy half today?

No, because as you said the dogs were lying all over us in the ruck and not allowing anything quick.

Doesn’t mean your number 9 doesn’t run the ball when the opportunity arises. Ruck speed doesn’t affect our half dropping the ball cold, passing it forward and showing absolutely no game management whatsoever. Enlighten us with your thoughts on how liddle and brooks played today????

Yes it does.

They (Brooks, Liddle) played scrappy. It was clunky affair. There was a whole lack of time given to our ball players by how much time the Dogs were taking away from us at the ruck.

Our attack was good with the runners with the ball. But broke down from the tackle, play the ball and the pass.

We are now with (Garner being injured) the most inexperienced forward pack in the game. It’s to be expected. But improvement is very much needed.

Blore is already showing more then garner in attack and defence. Our attack was good?? Lol did you watch the game. Our attack broke down from the tackle, play the ball and the pass. Who was responsible for the pass?? Our mate liddle. Terrible game by our number 7 and 9, absolutely no excuses.

I said our running attack, as in the ball carriers ran well and got good meters bespite having slow service.
We were good in the middle third and even getting out of our own zone. We were shocking in the attacking zone.
Did I not say that?

Interesting. So now your saying that the ball carriers ran well so that makes our attack good? My under 14s sons team have more structure then the tigers and there are two major players who make it all happen. Have a guess who? Will give you a hint they have a number 7 and a number 9 on their back.
 
@nt_tiger said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439596) said:
I might be on the wrong track here but to me, this game should be a litmus test for Maguire. We just played the absolute dead bottom floor team of the comp and fluffed it. It wasn't as if our opponents were putting us under pressure.
For Maguire, it should stand out like the proverbial which players are contributors and which are passengers or otherwise not up to standard.

shouldn’t Trent B cop the same scrutiny?
 
@jirskyr said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439559) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439327) said:
@aesopian said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439324) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439312) said:
@inbenjiwetrust said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439303) said:
It looks like the Dogs fans that were commenting so frequently about their club signing rumours on this forum, are somehow absent today for some reason!:blush:

Next year they’re adding Vaughan, JAC, TPJ and Burton. We’re adding 2 ESL players.

Somehow, I don't see those players working out so well for the dogs. Rest of their team is garbage & they're also losing Meaney to da storms.
Much the same from us next yr as well. Gonna be a loooooong one...

We were after all 4 of those players so we must have thought highly of them.

Tigers were never linked with Burton? We weren't after Vaughan either, the player himself said Madge rang him up to see where he was up to.

What does that mean see where he was up to . Why ring him if you’re not interested or are they best buddy’s
 
@balmainjnr said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439023) said:
@facepalmer said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439018) said:
Weird stuff by Twal there.

He had enough of being held down in the ruck with no repercussions from the ref.

I don’t understand why the dogs got to hold on to us forever like that…
 
@bigsiro said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439050) said:
@aturkey said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439043) said:
@pj said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439035) said:
With the quality of these dogs, we should have put 50 on them

Compare the teams. We are similar in quality. We are not a 50 point better team than them.

Agree

I think we are a 20 pt better team but we put in 50% effort.
 
@hugh1954 said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439047) said:
Nappa in big trouble at the judiciary as usual no good to us

Special magic round that was a send off but it’s not even a penalty now… also teams can basically do whatever they want to us but i think that’s us basically not reacting and crying foul, unfortunately you have to roll around and complain if you want to refs to notice.
 
@mike said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439066) said:
Blocker. “I don’t think that one was high” he wacked Twal smack on the jaw.

If blocker was intelligent he would be a commentator… oh wait….
 
@balmainjnr said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439072) said:
Hethrington paid for the combo of his and Napa’s work there

Hethrington seems like the kind of bloke that will get out of his car and punch you if you cut him of in traffic.
 
@jirskyr said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439533) said:
@member850 said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439122) said:
Putting my house on the cowboys next week,

I don't know, a lot of folks were confident Dogs would get up today as well.

I was one of them,
hopefully we put in a better effort next week. We’ll need to to beat the cowboys.
 
@jc99 said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439092) said:
Luciano been pretty good today.

Did the same thing hes done every game, push off players and then look around for some one to dish to but as usual they are looking at their shoes…..
 
Certainly won’t be watching any highlights of that game…. It is absolutely criminal that these guys make 300-700k a year for this. I feel dirty watching them.
 
@aesopian said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439324) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439312) said:
@inbenjiwetrust said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439303) said:
It looks like the Dogs fans that were commenting so frequently about their club signing rumours on this forum, are somehow absent today for some reason!:blush:

Next year they’re adding Vaughan, JAC, TPJ and Burton. We’re adding 2 ESL players.

Somehow, I don't see those players working out so well for the dogs. Rest of their team is garbage & they're also losing Meaney to da storms.
Much the same from us next yr as well. Gonna be a loooooong one...

Sour grapes.
Vaughn and TPJ are rep players. Burton, Dufty and Naden are excellent pieces. Burton in particular.

And the Fox. Maybe the fastest winger and greatest finisher in the era. Man I wish we had him. I wish we had any of them!
 
@851 said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439165) said:
@truetiger said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439128) said:
Great coaching job by Madge today....

Is this a joke, if anything it highlighted why he should be sacked tonight

My impression of the show on fox and the way the team plays is that madge is mothering this team. Because they play like they don’t want to hurt anyone and will get that aww you tried your best pat on the back and maccas after the footy no matter how shit they are.
 
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439599) said:
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439446) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439411) said:
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439404) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439389) said:
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439373) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439315) said:
The other myths in our team are liddle and brooks. Liddle has gone backwards so dramatically. Did he run once from dummy half today?

No, because as you said the dogs were lying all over us in the ruck and not allowing anything quick.

Doesn’t mean your number 9 doesn’t run the ball when the opportunity arises. Ruck speed doesn’t affect our half dropping the ball cold, passing it forward and showing absolutely no game management whatsoever. Enlighten us with your thoughts on how liddle and brooks played today????

Yes it does.

They (Brooks, Liddle) played scrappy. It was clunky affair. There was a whole lack of time given to our ball players by how much time the Dogs were taking away from us at the ruck.

Our attack was good with the runners with the ball. But broke down from the tackle, play the ball and the pass.

We are now with (Garner being injured) the most inexperienced forward pack in the game. It’s to be expected. But improvement is very much needed.

We are now without garner a much better team with Blore playing more minutes and missing zero tackles.

@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439404) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439389) said:
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439373) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439315) said:
The other myths in our team are liddle and brooks. Liddle has gone backwards so dramatically. Did he run once from dummy half today?

No, because as you said the dogs were lying all over us in the ruck and not allowing anything quick.

Doesn’t mean your number 9 doesn’t run the ball when the opportunity arises. Ruck speed doesn’t affect our half dropping the ball cold, passing it forward and showing absolutely no game management whatsoever. Enlighten us with your thoughts on how liddle and brooks played today????

Yes it does.

They (Brooks, Liddle) played scrappy. It was clunky affair. There was a whole lack of time given to our ball players by how much time the Dogs were taking away from us at the ruck.

Our attack was good with the runners with the ball. But broke down from the tackle, play the ball and the pass.

We are now with (Garner being injured) the most inexperienced forward pack in the game. It’s to be expected. But improvement is very much needed.

Blore is already showing more then garner in attack and defence. Our attack was good?? Lol did you watch the game. Our attack broke down from the tackle, play the ball and the pass. Who was responsible for the pass?? Our mate liddle. Terrible game by our number 7 and 9, absolutely no excuses.

I said our running attack, as in the ball carriers ran well and got good meters bespite having slow service.
We were good in the middle third and even getting out of our own zone. We were shocking in the attacking zone.
Did I not say that?

Interesting. So now your saying that the ball carriers ran well so that makes our attack good? My under 14s sons team have more structure then the tigers and there are two major players who make it all happen. Have a guess who? Will give you a hint they have a number 7 and a number 9 on their back.

Your taking my words out of context. I was pleased our runner and ball carriers made good meters, something we’ve struggled with for a fair bit.
I didn’t say our attack was good. Just our efforts with ball in hand was. Our ball movement was horrible.
 
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439683) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439599) said:
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439446) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439411) said:
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439404) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439389) said:
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439373) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439315) said:
The other myths in our team are liddle and brooks. Liddle has gone backwards so dramatically. Did he run once from dummy half today?

No, because as you said the dogs were lying all over us in the ruck and not allowing anything quick.

Doesn’t mean your number 9 doesn’t run the ball when the opportunity arises. Ruck speed doesn’t affect our half dropping the ball cold, passing it forward and showing absolutely no game management whatsoever. Enlighten us with your thoughts on how liddle and brooks played today????

Yes it does.

They (Brooks, Liddle) played scrappy. It was clunky affair. There was a whole lack of time given to our ball players by how much time the Dogs were taking away from us at the ruck.

Our attack was good with the runners with the ball. But broke down from the tackle, play the ball and the pass.

We are now with (Garner being injured) the most inexperienced forward pack in the game. It’s to be expected. But improvement is very much needed.

We are now without garner a much better team with Blore playing more minutes and missing zero tackles.

@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439404) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439389) said:
@needaname said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439373) said:
@tigerpower said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439315) said:
The other myths in our team are liddle and brooks. Liddle has gone backwards so dramatically. Did he run once from dummy half today?

No, because as you said the dogs were lying all over us in the ruck and not allowing anything quick.

Doesn’t mean your number 9 doesn’t run the ball when the opportunity arises. Ruck speed doesn’t affect our half dropping the ball cold, passing it forward and showing absolutely no game management whatsoever. Enlighten us with your thoughts on how liddle and brooks played today????

Yes it does.

They (Brooks, Liddle) played scrappy. It was clunky affair. There was a whole lack of time given to our ball players by how much time the Dogs were taking away from us at the ruck.

Our attack was good with the runners with the ball. But broke down from the tackle, play the ball and the pass.

We are now with (Garner being injured) the most inexperienced forward pack in the game. It’s to be expected. But improvement is very much needed.

Blore is already showing more then garner in attack and defence. Our attack was good?? Lol did you watch the game. Our attack broke down from the tackle, play the ball and the pass. Who was responsible for the pass?? Our mate liddle. Terrible game by our number 7 and 9, absolutely no excuses.

I said our running attack, as in the ball carriers ran well and got good meters bespite having slow service.
We were good in the middle third and even getting out of our own zone. We were shocking in the attacking zone.
Did I not say that?

Interesting. So now your saying that the ball carriers ran well so that makes our attack good? My under 14s sons team have more structure then the tigers and there are two major players who make it all happen. Have a guess who? Will give you a hint they have a number 7 and a number 9 on their back.

Your taking my words out of context. I was pleased our runner and ball carriers made good meters, something we’ve struggled with for a fair bit.
I didn’t say our attack was good. Just our efforts with ball in hand was. Our ball movement was horrible.

Apologies. I agree with what you have stated above.
 
@851 said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439182) said:
@gnr4life said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439167) said:
@elderslie_tiger said in [\*\*live game feed\*\* vs the Dogs](/post/1439151) said:
Watching the game today Madge is not the problem we have to many players that can find an error in their game a top team today would have put 50 on WT'S today they play some good moves but the errors cost us.

It’s the players who are the problem. Not the coach who signed them. Interesting.

Careful GNR, you will be labeled a hater like me

Say things like I strongly dislike or compare to a lower grade of being like a potato. Perhaps that’s the whole problem with this team though, no one’s even allowed to express their utter distain at the state of the team. You will get in trouble for even voicing your discontent.
 
Back
Top