I find the fuss being made about this a bit odd. Look at what happened at Canberra with Furner in charge. They gave him season after season because he had average to good seasons and they let a dynasty slip through their fingers. Getting the coach right with this side is a VERY BIG DEAL. We have a lot of very young players, Gen Y kids, who need to like their boss to get motivated. It's part of their makeup. They feel entitled and if they don't like who they work for they don't work well. It's hard luck for Mick Potter but if the players don't play for him, and the fact that they seem to only play well when Farah is around makes it seem like he's more of a leader at the club than the coach, then what's the point of having him around.
The performance this year being 9/9 after round 20, I don't think is due much to Potter. It's due more to the raw talent the side has. When they get momentum they destroy sides. If they had a coach who had some nous about him they'd be doing even better imo. When we show we have the skill to beat Manly, Souths and Bulldogs by big margins and turn around and lose to the Titans and Dragons I put it down to an inability to keep the side consistent and supply them with varied gameplans. Much the same way Bellamy gets the credit for the Storm's consistency.
I like Mick Potter's attitude and he might be a good coach, but I have been left disappointed in what has been dished up many times this year. I'm not that fussed about him leaving. I'm more concerned that if this problem was identified last year, that it took so long and was timed so disruptively.