innsaneink
Well-known member
Haha relying on forum members voting…solid
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:@ said:@ said:I thought we really gave it a shot out.
Here are some random thoughts on players that I thought stood out.
Brooks - he was good. He just doesn't seem to have the ability to go all game. He makes way too many mistakes. Heaps of poor passes.
Tui - I think he is possibly as good as Tedesco when it comes to running the footy but he has more to his game. He is a better passer and kicker of the footy.
Woods - he has a great offload but he has so many negatives in the game. Probably the worst defensive prop in the game. It's good that he is going.
Tedesco - great at times. Solid at times. Hog and glory plays that kill us. He could be missed but he isn't worth the huge dollars he is getting.
ET - this guy is consistently good and consistently making critical tackles all game.
Kev - good but another guy who makes heaps of dumb plays. We need better.
Twal/Eisenhuth - these guys both look good.
if you truly believe Woods is the worst defensive prop in the game you should seek professional help.
I might be wrong but who is worse than him defensively. It's a serious question as well.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:I thought we really gave it a shot out.
Here are some random thoughts on players that I thought stood out.
Brooks - he was good. He just doesn't seem to have the ability to go all game. He makes way too many mistakes. Heaps of poor passes.
Tui - I think he is possibly as good as Tedesco when it comes to running the footy but he has more to his game. He is a better passer and kicker of the footy.
Woods - he has a great offload but he has so many negatives in the game. Probably the worst defensive prop in the game. It's good that he is going.
Tedesco - great at times. Solid at times. Hog and glory plays that kill us. He could be missed but he isn't worth the huge dollars he is getting.
ET - this guy is consistently good and consistently making critical tackles all game.
Kev - good but another guy who makes heaps of dumb plays. We need better.
Twal/Eisenhuth - these guys both look good.
if you truly believe Woods is the worst defensive prop in the game you should seek professional help.
I might be wrong but who is worse than him defensively. It's a serious question as well.
Ava is worse. Sue is worse. Woods made 37 tackles, missed 2, played the full 80 minutes. He also ran for almost 200 metres. To hate the guy is fine, but he was really good today.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:if you truly believe Woods is the worst defensive prop in the game you should seek professional help.
I might be wrong but who is worse than him defensively. It's a serious question as well.
Ava is worse. Sue is worse. Woods made 37 tackles, missed 2, played the full 80 minutes. He also ran for almost 200 metres. To hate the guy is fine, but he was really good today.
As I've said in the past. It's not the fact Woods is a poor player. He is an ineffective prop.
Those minutes and stats should see him in a 13 jersey. Which opens up the opportunity to have more punchy front rowers. If that was to be the case. Woods work on the field would only help compliment quick aggressive front rowers.
I wonder if Des would have the smarts to make that his role next year?!
@ said:I do not understand the hate towards Woods the last 2 outings he has put in ..today played the full 80 after Origin as a supporter I could not ask for more..I am not a real woods fan but in all fairness the guy has put in of late!
@ said:@ said:I do not understand the hate towards Woods the last 2 outings he has put in ..today played the full 80 after Origin as a supporter I could not ask for more..I am not a real woods fan but in all fairness the guy has put in of late!
I agree that he is putting in. He played 80 minutes today backing up from origin. He got some great offloads away. We can play off the back of that and it makes a massive difference.
At the same time I can see heaps of negatives about his play.
@ said:@ said:@ said:I do not understand the hate towards Woods the last 2 outings he has put in ..today played the full 80 after Origin as a supporter I could not ask for more..I am not a real woods fan but in all fairness the guy has put in of late!
I agree that he is putting in. He played 80 minutes today backing up from origin. He got some great offloads away. We can play off the back of that and it makes a massive difference.
At the same time I can see heaps of negatives about his play.
As I said not a Fan of Woods my observations are a reflection on his attitude of late,and yes there are negatives.
@ said:I'm not sure that Ava and Sue are worse than Woods defensively. I honestly don't think that is a fair assessment of those two players. Sue is really poor laterally but Woods is poor laterally and lazy. Maybe Woods is playing too many minutes. Woods offloads are great. Some of his hit-ups are decent.
I definitely didn't see Ava and Sue miss tackles or be as lazy defensively today. Based on that game Woods is poorer defensively than those two.
I don't see the lock and prop positions as that different in today's game. They are basically interchangeable. Woods big positives are his minutes and his offloads. His metres are pretty poor per hit-up. His play the balls are slow. His defence is pretty ordinary.
@ said:Our backrow is abysmal - there is zero impact there. I'm just looking at the Cowboys backrow of Taumalolo, Hess and Cooper and Souths' Burgess, Crichton and Fuimaono and I just shake my head at how far behind we are. Chris McQueen isn't going to make any difference on his own.
@ said:Our backrow is abysmal - there is zero impact there. I'm just looking at the Cowboys backrow of Taumalolo, Hess and Cooper and Souths' Burgess, Crichton and Fuimaono and I just shake my head at how far behind we are. Chris McQueen isn't going to make any difference on his own.
@ said:@ said:Yes that makes sense the guy who coming off Origin plays 80 minutes at prop a few days later makes 200 meters and almost 40 tackles is the lazy one - yup yup yup well obviosuly it is the keyboard warriors who are geniuses their and not the genuine footy experts. Then again Ink hasn't said anything worth hearing since well umm well never so not a surprise really.
Tigers played great today against a top 4 team at home a traditional graveyard for visitng teams.
Can't say their was a bad player and if we play like that every week we would be in the finals
Another fool blinded by stats