shiretiger
Well-known member
http://www.smh.com.au/business/tax-office-to-wind-up-tinklers-teams-20121213-2bb7w.html
Looks like the Knights are in a spot of bother
Looks like the Knights are in a spot of bother
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Chris said:Im thinking the NRL will bail them out Newcastle is too big of an area to let go but I do envisage a fire sale on players. I wonder what will happen to Wayne Bennett.
@JoshTheNewcastleFan said:The media is making a massive deal out of this. The HSG owe a couple of million that they will pay before any court hearing in February.
The Knights will not fold, they are nowhere even near to doing so. Even if Tinkler does go broke, the Knights have a $20mil bank guarantee incase this were the situation. It's a massive shame about Tinkler, all he wanted to do was help make his team a force & now it looks like he's gonna be broke soon.
@JoshTheNewcastleFan said:The media is making a massive deal out of this. The HSG owe a couple of million that they will pay before any court hearing in February.
The Knights will not fold, they are nowhere even near to doing so. Even if Tinkler does go broke, the Knights have a $20mil bank guarantee incase this were the situation. It's a massive shame about Tinkler, all he wanted to do was help make his team a force & now it looks like he's gonna be broke soon.
@Tiger Watto said:@JoshTheNewcastleFan said:The media is making a massive deal out of this. The HSG owe a couple of million that they will pay before any court hearing in February.
The Knights will not fold, they are nowhere even near to doing so. Even if Tinkler does go broke, the Knights have a $20mil bank guarantee incase this were the situation. It's a massive shame about Tinkler, all he wanted to do was help make his team a force & now it looks like he's gonna be broke soon.
The Knights may have a guarantee for $20M and an option to regain control of the Football Club, but was the new NRL License Agreement signed by the Newcastle Football Club or HSG?
@LaT said:@Tiger Watto said:@JoshTheNewcastleFan said:The media is making a massive deal out of this. The HSG owe a couple of million that they will pay before any court hearing in February.
The Knights will not fold, they are nowhere even near to doing so. Even if Tinkler does go broke, the Knights have a $20mil bank guarantee incase this were the situation. It's a massive shame about Tinkler, all he wanted to do was help make his team a force & now it looks like he's gonna be broke soon.
The Knights may have a guarantee for $20M and an option to regain control of the Football Club, but was the new NRL License Agreement signed by the Newcastle Football Club or HSG?
Not sure but I don't think it would make a huge difference. You would think the NRL license is held by the club, and the club is owned by HSG.
If/when Tinkles can't meet his contract obligations with the club (something like $10m in sponsorship each year for 10 years?) then the members buy back the club for $1, debt free and with $20m which goes down to $10m after Jan 31st 2013\. Nice position to be in IMO.
@Cultured Bogan said:@LaT said:@Tiger Watto said:@JoshTheNewcastleFan said:The media is making a massive deal out of this. The HSG owe a couple of million that they will pay before any court hearing in February.
The Knights will not fold, they are nowhere even near to doing so. Even if Tinkler does go broke, the Knights have a $20mil bank guarantee incase this were the situation. It's a massive shame about Tinkler, all he wanted to do was help make his team a force & now it looks like he's gonna be broke soon.
The Knights may have a guarantee for $20M and an option to regain control of the Football Club, but was the new NRL License Agreement signed by the Newcastle Football Club or HSG?
Not sure but I don't think it would make a huge difference. You would think the NRL license is held by the club, and the club is owned by HSG.
If/when Tinkles can't meet his contract obligations with the club (something like $10m in sponsorship each year for 10 years?) then the members buy back the club for $1, debt free and with $20m which goes down to $10m after Jan 31st 2013\. Nice position to be in IMO.
I thought Tinkler wasn't actually pumping 10m a year into the Knights. I thought it was a guarantee that he'd top up the club income to 10m. So after grants, sponsorships etc, he'd make up the shortfall up until 10m. 10m must have been the break-even point?