Luke Brooks - Mega Thread

Time to go. I've tried to be patient but he will be one that if he does go on with it, it won't be here.

Don't like bagging the guy as he stuck around when all the others left and he seems like a decent enough guy, but he's gone backwards here. I don't doubt he's trying but it's just not working for him. He would thrive at the Roosters playing 6 outside Keary.
 
8 years and 150 games, gets a big no from me, should have already happened, we like to hang on in hope
 
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1319958) said:
@bob said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1319946) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1319922) said:
Ok guys, leave the debate for other appropriate threads.

Have your vote and try to keep the comments to the vote only.

Throwing madden, another rookie into the spine is madness. The issue with our spine now is nobody knows what it takes to win in the NRL.

I’d be all for getting rid of brooks if you got a Reynolds or a Cleary signed as a replacement. But you a just putting people there who aren’t ready for the sake of getting rid of brooks.

It’s a replay of binning sheens because he didn’t make the eight, then going through four coaches with very little success.

We got rid of Benji because everyone though brooks would be better for the team. after two games we are panicking and are going to hand the team over to Madden who has never played NRL or AD who has played about 150 minutes in the halves?

If you want brooks gone fine, but go to market and get him replaced by somebody you know will be better.


What part of the leave the comments for other appropriate threads do you not understand.

Isn't this a Forum? - or is it a Dictatorship?
 
@russell said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320020) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1319958) said:
@bob said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1319946) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1319922) said:
Ok guys, leave the debate for other appropriate threads.

Have your vote and try to keep the comments to the vote only.

Throwing madden, another rookie into the spine is madness. The issue with our spine now is nobody knows what it takes to win in the NRL.

I’d be all for getting rid of brooks if you got a Reynolds or a Cleary signed as a replacement. But you a just putting people there who aren’t ready for the sake of getting rid of brooks.

It’s a replay of binning sheens because he didn’t make the eight, then going through four coaches with very little success.

We got rid of Benji because everyone though brooks would be better for the team. after two games we are panicking and are going to hand the team over to Madden who has never played NRL or AD who has played about 150 minutes in the halves?

If you want brooks gone fine, but go to market and get him replaced by somebody you know will be better.


What part of the leave the comments for other appropriate threads do you not understand.

Isn't this a Forum? - or is it a Dictatorship?

He likes to dictate...
Doesn’t work though !
 
Lol

Reality is those that are commenting have every right to comment. It is a forum. Correct.

Was just trying to not double up on threads about this issue when we already have that conversation active elsewhere.

If you feel the need to take focus off of the poll go right ahead.
 
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320006) said:
It’s inconceivable that anyone who actually goes for the Tigers would want him here.
The only people who want him here are our opponents. They are all having a good laugh!

16 imposters and counting


I think it is more a case of who do you replace him with? There are 23 rounds to go, and there are no halves better than him in the club. You throw a season away to express your anger?
 
In my opinion, he gets this season to prove all of the "getting overcalled" stuff really was the problem previously. He's now the most experienced player in our backline and in our spine. If he still doesn't perform this year then he needs to be let go.
 
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320027) said:
Lol

Reality is those that are commenting have every right to comment. It is a forum. Correct.

Was just trying to not double up on threads about this issue when we already have that conversation active elsewhere.

If you feel the need to take focus off of the poll go right ahead.


Well if you would rather focus on the poll, it is a ridiculous poll and the results of the poll will be completely meaningless due to the weak nature of the poll.

Do You Want Luke Brooks in the Team Going Forward?

What does going forward mean? Next week? June? 2022?

Do We Want Luke Brooks in the Team, instead of who? Instead of Josh Reynolds? Yes. Madden? Yes, Luke KEary? No. Nathan Cleary? No. Flanagan? Yes.

Stupid poll gets stupid responses.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320033) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320027) said:
Lol

Reality is those that are commenting have every right to comment. It is a forum. Correct.

Was just trying to not double up on threads about this issue when we already have that conversation active elsewhere.

If you feel the need to take focus off of the poll go right ahead.


Well if you would rather focus on the poll, it is a ridiculous poll and the results of the poll will be completely meaningless due to the weak nature of the poll.

Do You Want Luke Brooks in the Team Going Forward?

What does going forward mean? Next week? June? 2022?

Do We Want Luke Brooks in the Team, instead of who? Instead of Josh Reynolds? Yes. Madden? Yes, Luke KEary? No. Nathan Cleary? No. Flanagan? Yes.

Stupid poll gets stupid responses.

Lol see my comment above.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320029) said:
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320006) said:
It’s inconceivable that anyone who actually goes for the Tigers would want him here.
The only people who want him here are our opponents. They are all having a good laugh!

16 imposters and counting


I think it is more a case of who do you replace him with? There are 23 rounds to go, and there are no halves better than him in the club. You throw a season away to express your anger?

Doueihi at 7 and Mbye at 6? They can't be any worse.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320033) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320027) said:
Lol

Reality is those that are commenting have every right to comment. It is a forum. Correct.

Was just trying to not double up on threads about this issue when we already have that conversation active elsewhere.

If you feel the need to take focus off of the poll go right ahead.


Well if you would rather focus on the poll, it is a ridiculous poll and the results of the poll will be completely meaningless due to the weak nature of the poll.

Do You Want Luke Brooks in the Team Going Forward?

What does going forward mean? Next week? June? 2022?

Do We Want Luke Brooks in the Team, instead of who? Instead of Josh Reynolds? Yes. Madden? Yes, Luke KEary? No. Nathan Cleary? No. Flanagan? Yes.

Stupid poll gets stupid responses.

Pretty obvious that he means that all things considered, do you believe that the team should persist with him.
 
@cultured_bogan said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320041) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320033) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320027) said:
Lol

Reality is those that are commenting have every right to comment. It is a forum. Correct.

Was just trying to not double up on threads about this issue when we already have that conversation active elsewhere.

If you feel the need to take focus off of the poll go right ahead.


Well if you would rather focus on the poll, it is a ridiculous poll and the results of the poll will be completely meaningless due to the weak nature of the poll.

Do You Want Luke Brooks in the Team Going Forward?

What does going forward mean? Next week? June? 2022?

Do We Want Luke Brooks in the Team, instead of who? Instead of Josh Reynolds? Yes. Madden? Yes, Luke KEary? No. Nathan Cleary? No. Flanagan? Yes.

Stupid poll gets stupid responses.

Pretty obvious that he means that all things considered, do you believe that the team should persist with him.


I dont think so at all.

For example....based on only the first two weeks, I would be looking to replace Brooks next year, but I would be picking him every week this year because there is no one better in the club.
 
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320037) said:
It's nothing more than a vote of confidence.

Vote how you see fit and save the drama for your mumma


Says the bloke who asked Geo to delete posts that didnt meet "the rules"
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320044) said:
@cultured_bogan said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320041) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320033) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320027) said:
Lol

Reality is those that are commenting have every right to comment. It is a forum. Correct.

Was just trying to not double up on threads about this issue when we already have that conversation active elsewhere.

If you feel the need to take focus off of the poll go right ahead.


Well if you would rather focus on the poll, it is a ridiculous poll and the results of the poll will be completely meaningless due to the weak nature of the poll.

Do You Want Luke Brooks in the Team Going Forward?

What does going forward mean? Next week? June? 2022?

Do We Want Luke Brooks in the Team, instead of who? Instead of Josh Reynolds? Yes. Madden? Yes, Luke KEary? No. Nathan Cleary? No. Flanagan? Yes.

Stupid poll gets stupid responses.

Pretty obvious that he means that all things considered, do you believe that the team should persist with him.


I dont think so at all.

For example....based on only the first two weeks, I would be looking to replace Brooks next year, but I would be picking him every week this year because there is no one better in the club.

Then vote yes and leave it at that. It's very simple
 
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320050) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320044) said:
@cultured_bogan said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320041) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320033) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320027) said:
Lol

Reality is those that are commenting have every right to comment. It is a forum. Correct.

Was just trying to not double up on threads about this issue when we already have that conversation active elsewhere.

If you feel the need to take focus off of the poll go right ahead.


Well if you would rather focus on the poll, it is a ridiculous poll and the results of the poll will be completely meaningless due to the weak nature of the poll.

Do You Want Luke Brooks in the Team Going Forward?

What does going forward mean? Next week? June? 2022?

Do We Want Luke Brooks in the Team, instead of who? Instead of Josh Reynolds? Yes. Madden? Yes, Luke KEary? No. Nathan Cleary? No. Flanagan? Yes.

Stupid poll gets stupid responses.

Pretty obvious that he means that all things considered, do you believe that the team should persist with him.


I dont think so at all.

For example....based on only the first two weeks, I would be looking to replace Brooks next year, but I would be picking him every week this year because there is no one better in the club.

Then vote yes and leave it at that. It's very simple


How is it that simple, I want them to replace him.

Its a poorly framed poll and will generate poor results.
 
Pearce is only on a one year contract at the Knights.

After he puts 50 on us this weekend, chuck a large amount of cash and a Pets Warehouse voucher at him.

Edit: just joking guys.
 
@tigerbalm said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320053) said:
Pearce is only on a one year contract at the Knights.

After he puts 50 on us this weekend, chuck a large amount of cash and a Pets Warehouse voucher at him.

No thanks, would rather Reynolds.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320046) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1320037) said:
It's nothing more than a vote of confidence.

Vote how you see fit and save the drama for your mumma


Says the bloke who asked Geo to delete posts that didnt meet "the rules"

Because I knew what was coming. Been reading this forum for years.

When confronted with a simple yes or no people like yourself fear the brutality of a simple question and try and divert the topic into another pointless debate. One that already exists.
 
Back
Top