crazycat
Well-known member
Honestly it's better thinking and more of the kind of thinking we need.So were putting an indecisive player who can't drive a team around the park into hooker.
Right?
We all realise (don't we?) that the hooker dictates who gets the ball, when they get it, how fast the game is played and who's decision, on almost every play, makes up 50% of the success or failure of that play.
If that is the plan Noddy can't coach at U12's let alone a FG team.
Halfback requires greater strategy then Hooker, Brooks isn't a strategical hooker and doesn't have that Rugby league brain. Hooker the thinking is less, important but less. Brooks can get the ball out quickly to either the halfback or 5/8 as he sees it. A reduced role like this may work.
Lets face it this move has worked for a stack of Halfbacks:
Peter Wallace
Ben Hunt
Even Andrew Johns played a stint at hooker at Origin to Brett Kimmorley.
The problem with moving Brooks to hooker is:
1. our 2 dozen hookers we have recruited.
2. The physicality of the position. Brooks is pretty good but not really that physical. Josh Reynolds tried his hand at Hooker and couldn't handle the constant grind. Brooks is going to be worse the Josh in that respect. Not knocking Brooks as his defense has improved a lot since he and mitch were the pool turnstyles, but he wont' handle the physicality.
Still if it works out. We should get a webcam and microphone ready for 2023
"Hey Api, glad your here but your going to have to sit on the Bench while Luke Brooks plays 9!"
With the basketcases we are, it could happen.