Luke Brooks

Status
Not open for further replies.
@tig_prmz said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335993) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1333725) said:
Attack and defence under IC was so much better. We need to look at how we play. Offloads need to be a feature of our game. Our players look scared to demonstrate flair which has always been part of WT DNA.

I think we lead the NRL in offloads

That's off loading players is it
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335994) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335993) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1333725) said:
Attack and defence under IC was so much better. We need to look at how we play. Offloads need to be a feature of our game. Our players look scared to demonstrate flair which has always been part of WT DNA.

I think we lead the NRL in offloads

Handovers for sure !

![offloads.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281864658-offloads.png)

![sets.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281880042-sets.png)
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336003) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335994) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335993) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1333725) said:
Attack and defence under IC was so much better. We need to look at how we play. Offloads need to be a feature of our game. Our players look scared to demonstrate flair which has always been part of WT DNA.

I think we lead the NRL in offloads

Handovers for sure !

![offloads.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281864658-offloads.png)

![sets.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281880042-sets.png)

Handovers are complete sets that’s why we’re up there ..
Context ..
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336008) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336003) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335994) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335993) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1333725) said:
Attack and defence under IC was so much better. We need to look at how we play. Offloads need to be a feature of our game. Our players look scared to demonstrate flair which has always been part of WT DNA.

I think we lead the NRL in offloads

Handovers for sure !

![offloads.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281864658-offloads.png)

![sets.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281880042-sets.png)

Handovers are complete sets that’s why we’re up there ..
Context ..

A handover 5m out is better than a seven tackle set....context.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336013) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336008) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336003) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335994) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335993) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1333725) said:
Attack and defence under IC was so much better. We need to look at how we play. Offloads need to be a feature of our game. Our players look scared to demonstrate flair which has always been part of WT DNA.

I think we lead the NRL in offloads

Handovers for sure !

![offloads.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281864658-offloads.png)

![sets.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281880042-sets.png)

Handovers are complete sets that’s why we’re up there ..
Context ..

A handover 5m out is better than a seven tackle set....context.

That’s where Brooks fails
...context .
If Kenny Bromwich can do it why can’t Luke ?
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336015) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336013) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336008) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336003) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335994) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335993) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1333725) said:
Attack and defence under IC was so much better. We need to look at how we play. Offloads need to be a feature of our game. Our players look scared to demonstrate flair which has always been part of WT DNA.

I think we lead the NRL in offloads

Handovers for sure !

![offloads.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281864658-offloads.png)

![sets.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281880042-sets.png)

Handovers are complete sets that’s why we’re up there ..
Context ..

A handover 5m out is better than a seven tackle set....context.

That’s where Brooks fails
...context .
If Kenny Bromwich can do it why can’t Luke ?

![brooksy.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618283257903-brooksy.png)
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336016) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336015) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336013) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336008) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336003) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335994) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335993) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1333725) said:
Attack and defence under IC was so much better. We need to look at how we play. Offloads need to be a feature of our game. Our players look scared to demonstrate flair which has always been part of WT DNA.

I think we lead the NRL in offloads

Handovers for sure !

![offloads.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281864658-offloads.png)

![sets.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281880042-sets.png)

Handovers are complete sets that’s why we’re up there ..
Context ..

A handover 5m out is better than a seven tackle set....context.

That’s where Brooks fails
...context .
If Kenny Bromwich can do it why can’t Luke ?

![brooksy.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618283257903-brooksy.png)

He should have 15
Keary has been missing for a month .
Repeat sets please
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336017) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336016) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336015) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336013) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336008) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336003) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335994) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335993) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1333725) said:
Attack and defence under IC was so much better. We need to look at how we play. Offloads need to be a feature of our game. Our players look scared to demonstrate flair which has always been part of WT DNA.

I think we lead the NRL in offloads

Handovers for sure !

![offloads.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281864658-offloads.png)

![sets.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281880042-sets.png)

Handovers are complete sets that’s why we’re up there ..
Context ..

A handover 5m out is better than a seven tackle set....context.

That’s where Brooks fails
...context .
If Kenny Bromwich can do it why can’t Luke ?

![brooksy.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618283257903-brooksy.png)

Repeat sets please

What are they?
 
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335954) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335943) said:
Now there are reports of a swap between Brooks and Reynolds.
Guess what?
The South’s fans don’t want him ... they’d rather try kids with zero games.

If souffs get him it will be because of Wayne Bennett

Not because of some 55 year old bloke named Greg on Facebook

Do you reckon scum fans watch any of our games with interest anyway?

Obviously they do watch our games... that’s why 99% of their comments said Brooks was a dud.
Also amazing how some people on here get on their high horse and think they’re so superior to someone commenting on Facebook just because they happen to be a member of a ‘forum’.
 
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336021) said:
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335954) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335943) said:
Now there are reports of a swap between Brooks and Reynolds.
Guess what?
The South’s fans don’t want him ... they’d rather try kids with zero games.

If souffs get him it will be because of Wayne Bennett

Not because of some 55 year old bloke named Greg on Facebook

Do you reckon scum fans watch any of our games with interest anyway?

Obviously they do watch our games... that’s why 99% of their comments said Brooks was a dud.
Also amazing how some people on here get on their high horse and think they’re so superior to someone commenting on Facebook just because they happen to be a member of a ‘forum’.

So a souffs fan will know more about our players than a tigers fan
Ok
If he ends up at the red and green trash, who will be responsible for the signing?

You didn’t answer that one
 
@wt2k said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336018) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336017) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336016) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336015) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336013) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336008) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336003) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335994) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335993) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1333725) said:
Attack and defence under IC was so much better. We need to look at how we play. Offloads need to be a feature of our game. Our players look scared to demonstrate flair which has always been part of WT DNA.

I think we lead the NRL in offloads

Handovers for sure !

![offloads.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281864658-offloads.png)

![sets.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618281880042-sets.png)

Handovers are complete sets that’s why we’re up there ..
Context ..

A handover 5m out is better than a seven tackle set....context.

That’s where Brooks fails
...context .
If Kenny Bromwich can do it why can’t Luke ?

![brooksy.png](/assets/uploads/files/1618283257903-brooksy.png)

Repeat sets please

What are they?

Rocking horse nuggets
 
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336027) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336021) said:
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335954) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335943) said:
Now there are reports of a swap between Brooks and Reynolds.
Guess what?
The South’s fans don’t want him ... they’d rather try kids with zero games.

If souffs get him it will be because of Wayne Bennett

Not because of some 55 year old bloke named Greg on Facebook

Do you reckon scum fans watch any of our games with interest anyway?

Obviously they do watch our games... that’s why 99% of their comments said Brooks was a dud.
Also amazing how some people on here get on their high horse and think they’re so superior to someone commenting on Facebook just because they happen to be a member of a ‘forum’.

So a souffs fan will know more about our players than a tigers fan
Ok
If he ends up at the red and green trash, who will be responsible for the signing?

You didn’t answer that one

The Gladiator
 
@tony-soprano said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336030) said:
Clubs silence on brooks is deafening


I would be more concerned if the club was commenting on Brooks or any one of our players.
To a large extent the leaks from the club have stopped and thats the way it should be
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336032) said:
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336027) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336021) said:
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335954) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335943) said:
Now there are reports of a swap between Brooks and Reynolds.
Guess what?
The South’s fans don’t want him ... they’d rather try kids with zero games.

If souffs get him it will be because of Wayne Bennett

Not because of some 55 year old bloke named Greg on Facebook

Do you reckon scum fans watch any of our games with interest anyway?

Obviously they do watch our games... that’s why 99% of their comments said Brooks was a dud.
Also amazing how some people on here get on their high horse and think they’re so superior to someone commenting on Facebook just because they happen to be a member of a ‘forum’.

So a souffs fan will know more about our players than a tigers fan
Ok
If he ends up at the red and green trash, who will be responsible for the signing?

You didn’t answer that one

The Gladiator

Gagai maybe? Round 2?
 
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336036) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336032) said:
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336027) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336021) said:
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335954) said:
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1335943) said:
Now there are reports of a swap between Brooks and Reynolds.
Guess what?
The South’s fans don’t want him ... they’d rather try kids with zero games.

If souffs get him it will be because of Wayne Bennett

Not because of some 55 year old bloke named Greg on Facebook

Do you reckon scum fans watch any of our games with interest anyway?

Obviously they do watch our games... that’s why 99% of their comments said Brooks was a dud.
Also amazing how some people on here get on their high horse and think they’re so superior to someone commenting on Facebook just because they happen to be a member of a ‘forum’.

So a souffs fan will know more about our players than a tigers fan
Ok
If he ends up at the red and green trash, who will be responsible for the signing?

You didn’t answer that one

The Gladiator

Gagai maybe? Round 2?

Hope so but it’s a week to late for that
 
@tony-soprano said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336030) said:
Clubs silence on brooks is deafening


What exactly do you expect the Club to be announcing regarding Luke Brooks?

I happen to know for a **FACT** that the Club will be making a **significant statement** regarding Luke Brooks at 4pm this afternoon. Remember you heard it here first!
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336049) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336030) said:
Clubs silence on brooks is deafening


What exactly do you expect the Club to be announcing regarding Luke Brooks?

I happen to know for a **FACT** that the Club will be making a **significant statement** regarding Luke Brooks at 4pm this afternoon. Remember you heard it here first!

He ain’t going nowhere...?
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336050) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336049) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336030) said:
Clubs silence on brooks is deafening


What exactly do you expect the Club to be announcing regarding Luke Brooks?

I happen to know for a **FACT** that the Club will be making a **significant statement** regarding Luke Brooks at 4pm this afternoon. Remember you heard it here first!

He ain’t going nowhere...?

Team announcement
 
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336052) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336050) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336049) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1336030) said:
Clubs silence on brooks is deafening


What exactly do you expect the Club to be announcing regarding Luke Brooks?

I happen to know for a **FACT** that the Club will be making a **significant statement** regarding Luke Brooks at 4pm this afternoon. Remember you heard it here first!

He ain’t going nowhere...?

Team announcement

#9? Dropped?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top