@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421740) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421738) said:@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421737) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421732) said:@tony-soprano said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421728) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421723) said:@weststigerman said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421720) said:@needaname said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421718) said:Hoops spilled on NRL 360.
My big question is. Who are these rouge Tigers ‘officials’ that believe that can make recruitment and retention calls between clubs?
What he said is total rubbish. The real question is who leaks this stuff.
What did he say, I don't really watch the talking head shows as I rate my opinion higher than theirs lol
A tigers official called Canberra and said we offer you Luke Brooks and mbye for wighton and Hodgon then they all began to laugh
I just saw it, I don't believe that for a second.
Then the Tigers should engage lawyers, we are constantly portrayed as fools, I’m not sure it’s just a perception.
And sue who?
The people making crap up about them. In this case it was Hooper.
If Brooks goes he needs to be smart with where he ends up. Raiders aren’t the right place for him because he will end up with Wighton in the halves and that won’t gel. He needs to go to a club with an established halfback. He is a 5/8 not halfback.
Roosters would be the perfect destination for him but I don’t know if they would play him over Walker at 5/8.
Otherwise, maybe Broncos with Reynolds or Storm with Hughes.