Luke Brooks

Status
Not open for further replies.
@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421740) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421738) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421737) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421732) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421728) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421723) said:
@weststigerman said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421720) said:
@needaname said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421718) said:
Hoops spilled on NRL 360.

My big question is. Who are these rouge Tigers ‘officials’ that believe that can make recruitment and retention calls between clubs?

What he said is total rubbish. The real question is who leaks this stuff.

What did he say, I don't really watch the talking head shows as I rate my opinion higher than theirs lol

A tigers official called Canberra and said we offer you Luke Brooks and mbye for wighton and Hodgon then they all began to laugh

I just saw it, I don't believe that for a second.

Then the Tigers should engage lawyers, we are constantly portrayed as fools, I’m not sure it’s just a perception.

And sue who?

The people making crap up about them. In this case it was Hooper.



If Brooks goes he needs to be smart with where he ends up. Raiders aren’t the right place for him because he will end up with Wighton in the halves and that won’t gel. He needs to go to a club with an established halfback. He is a 5/8 not halfback.

Roosters would be the perfect destination for him but I don’t know if they would play him over Walker at 5/8.

Otherwise, maybe Broncos with Reynolds or Storm with Hughes.
 
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452173) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452127) said:
Backing a half that can’t even get a repeat set … laughable

He is actually 7th in the NRL for fdo.. shocked me too..

1st for line engaged, he and AD only non top 8 halves in top 10 for TA's, Top 5 for kick metres.

If we made the 8, this thread doesnt exist. If we could defend, we are in the 8.
 
@milky said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452179) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421740) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421738) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421737) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421732) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421728) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421723) said:
@weststigerman said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421720) said:
@needaname said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1421718) said:
Hoops spilled on NRL 360.

My big question is. Who are these rouge Tigers ‘officials’ that believe that can make recruitment and retention calls between clubs?

What he said is total rubbish. The real question is who leaks this stuff.

What did he say, I don't really watch the talking head shows as I rate my opinion higher than theirs lol

A tigers official called Canberra and said we offer you Luke Brooks and mbye for wighton and Hodgon then they all began to laugh

I just saw it, I don't believe that for a second.

Then the Tigers should engage lawyers, we are constantly portrayed as fools, I’m not sure it’s just a perception.

And sue who?

The people making crap up about them. In this case it was Hooper.



If Brooks goes he needs to be smart with where he ends up. Raiders aren’t the right place for him because he will end up with Wighton in the halves and that won’t gel. He needs to go to a club with an established halfback. He is a 5/8 not halfback.

Roosters would be the perfect destination for him but I don’t know if they would play him over Walker at 5/8.

Otherwise, maybe Broncos with Reynolds or Storm with Hughes.

Sorry didn’t mean to quote anyone..
 
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452177) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452170) said:
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452162) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452158) said:
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452156) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452120) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452116) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452099) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452091) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452077) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452070) said:
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452038) said:
I like that the biggest arguments for Brooks are currently "he's not our worst player" and "he's not the worst halfback in the league"

Is that really where the bar is for Wests Tigers at the moment ?

Long way from the worst halfback in the league but that is irrelevant. Who do you intend to replace him with? Is that relevant?
![line.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601798207-line.png)
![kick m.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601806217-kick-m.png)
![brooks TA.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601814571-brooks-ta.png)

The only two halves in the top 10 for Try ASsists from outside the top 8 are Brooks and Doueihi, wonder what that says? Could defence be the difference between top 8 and where we are?

Ahh the good old stats spread sheet ?

Obviously you were distracted by the pretty pictures Hobbo and you missed the point. I'll simplify.

Who do you intend replacing him with and on what evidence are they better?

Hastings will be replacing him …no evidence required.

No evidence exists.

Imagine the meeting where someone decides....."OK, we need a new halfback, one that we can build a successful team around and rebuild this club........oh there is only one man,,,,.......Jackson Hastings"

?

Such a lame argument.
Hastings might not be the panacea. In fact I think we all know that he is not the next Cronk or John’s.
But he won’t be worse. To be worse he’d have to put in roughly 9 years of crap. I’m betting he won’t do that.

Like I said in my last post, it’s ridiculous to claim he can’t be worse. Look at Billy Walters yesterday. There’s always worse.

I don’t think Walters was any good. But at least has something Brooks does not have anymore - potential.
Oh, and 9 years of sub par performances.

Walters has potential? You really resent Brooks that much that you would resort to dying on that hill? If there was ever a way to ruin your credibility in one post.

Nah not dying up there. I do think Walters sucks. Wouldn’t have him as our 7 either.

Thats the point, who are you replacing him with because there are plenty that COULD be worse. I got shouted down (probably correctly) for suggesting Ash Taylor.
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452178) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452171) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452132) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452116) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452099) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452091) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452077) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452070) said:
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452038) said:
I like that the biggest arguments for Brooks are currently "he's not our worst player" and "he's not the worst halfback in the league"

Is that really where the bar is for Wests Tigers at the moment ?

Long way from the worst halfback in the league but that is irrelevant. Who do you intend to replace him with? Is that relevant?
![line.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601798207-line.png)
![kick m.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601806217-kick-m.png)
![brooks TA.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601814571-brooks-ta.png)

The only two halves in the top 10 for Try ASsists from outside the top 8 are Brooks and Doueihi, wonder what that says? Could defence be the difference between top 8 and where we are?

Ahh the good old stats spread sheet ?

Obviously you were distracted by the pretty pictures Hobbo and you missed the point. I'll simplify.

Who do you intend replacing him with and on what evidence are they better?

Hastings will be replacing him …no evidence required.

No evidence exists.

Imagine the meeting where someone decides....."OK, we need a new halfback, one that we can build a successful team around and rebuild this club........oh there is only one man,,,,.......Jackson Hastings"

He’ll be an improvement on what we have

Maybe.......again there is no evidence that he will be and for mine throwing out what we have requires a higher level of evidence than that

If we can offload Brooks I won’t lose any sleep ..
He’s had 9 years at halfback and done Jack ..
Hastings isn’t coming to play marbles mate ..
Move Brooks to 9 or 13
***Enough is enough.. it hasn’t worked***

I have no problems with that philosophy if he is replaced with proven better. IMO this club will not survive another aborted rebuild.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452180) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452173) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452127) said:
Backing a half that can’t even get a repeat set … laughable

He is actually 7th in the NRL for fdo.. shocked me too..

1st for line engaged, he and AD only non top 8 halves in top 10 for TA's, Top 5 for kick metres.

If we made the 8, this thread doesnt exist. If we could defend, we are in the 8.

Yep and the plan to address that appears to be move on anyone that can actually defend at NRL Standard
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452178) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452171) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452132) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452116) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452099) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452091) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452077) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452070) said:
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452038) said:
I like that the biggest arguments for Brooks are currently "he's not our worst player" and "he's not the worst halfback in the league"

Is that really where the bar is for Wests Tigers at the moment ?

Long way from the worst halfback in the league but that is irrelevant. Who do you intend to replace him with? Is that relevant?
![line.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601798207-line.png)
![kick m.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601806217-kick-m.png)
![brooks TA.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601814571-brooks-ta.png)

The only two halves in the top 10 for Try ASsists from outside the top 8 are Brooks and Doueihi, wonder what that says? Could defence be the difference between top 8 and where we are?

Ahh the good old stats spread sheet ?

Obviously you were distracted by the pretty pictures Hobbo and you missed the point. I'll simplify.

Who do you intend replacing him with and on what evidence are they better?

Hastings will be replacing him …no evidence required.

No evidence exists.

Imagine the meeting where someone decides....."OK, we need a new halfback, one that we can build a successful team around and rebuild this club........oh there is only one man,,,,.......Jackson Hastings"

He’ll be an improvement on what we have

Maybe.......again there is no evidence that he will be and for mine throwing out what we have requires a higher level of evidence than that

If we can offload Brooks I won’t lose any sleep ..
He’s had 9 years at halfback and done Jack ..
Hastings isn’t coming to play marbles mate ..
Move Brooks to 9 or 13
Enough is enough.. it hasn’t worked

That’s the second time you have said that about Hastings and I don’t get it. Nowhere has it been said he’s coming to play halfback. And like I said last night, every other player has come here to bludge, why is he any different?
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452186) said:
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452177) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452170) said:
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452162) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452158) said:
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452156) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452120) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452116) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452099) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452091) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452077) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452070) said:
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452038) said:
I like that the biggest arguments for Brooks are currently "he's not our worst player" and "he's not the worst halfback in the league"

Is that really where the bar is for Wests Tigers at the moment ?

Long way from the worst halfback in the league but that is irrelevant. Who do you intend to replace him with? Is that relevant?
![line.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601798207-line.png)
![kick m.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601806217-kick-m.png)
![brooks TA.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601814571-brooks-ta.png)

The only two halves in the top 10 for Try ASsists from outside the top 8 are Brooks and Doueihi, wonder what that says? Could defence be the difference between top 8 and where we are?

Ahh the good old stats spread sheet ?

Obviously you were distracted by the pretty pictures Hobbo and you missed the point. I'll simplify.

Who do you intend replacing him with and on what evidence are they better?

Hastings will be replacing him …no evidence required.

No evidence exists.

Imagine the meeting where someone decides....."OK, we need a new halfback, one that we can build a successful team around and rebuild this club........oh there is only one man,,,,.......Jackson Hastings"

?

Such a lame argument.
Hastings might not be the panacea. In fact I think we all know that he is not the next Cronk or John’s.
But he won’t be worse. To be worse he’d have to put in roughly 9 years of crap. I’m betting he won’t do that.

Like I said in my last post, it’s ridiculous to claim he can’t be worse. Look at Billy Walters yesterday. There’s always worse.

I don’t think Walters was any good. But at least has something Brooks does not have anymore - potential.
Oh, and 9 years of sub par performances.

Walters has potential? You really resent Brooks that much that you would resort to dying on that hill? If there was ever a way to ruin your credibility in one post.

Nah not dying up there. I do think Walters sucks. Wouldn’t have him as our 7 either.

Thats the point, who are you replacing him with because there are plenty that COULD be worse. I got shouted down (probably correctly) for suggesting , Ash Taylor.

Ash Taylor stays at the broncos , they don’t go into the heap they’re currently in . He has been poorly developed , and I believe if he stayed at the broncos that wouldn’t have happened as his talent was/us immense , and they’ve always been good at developing the organising type half . He went to the Titans chased the money , got the money , and ate pies for 4 years . And his NRL career is over now because of it .
Sliding doors . Also the signing of Jarryd Hayne was the worst buy in nrl history .
 
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452188) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452180) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452173) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452127) said:
Backing a half that can’t even get a repeat set … laughable

He is actually 7th in the NRL for fdo.. shocked me too..

1st for line engaged, he and AD only non top 8 halves in top 10 for TA's, Top 5 for kick metres.

If we made the 8, this thread doesnt exist. If we could defend, we are in the 8.

Yep and the plan to address that appears to be move on anyone that can actually defend at NRL Standard

What’s the point in paying and playing a half just to tackle ?
He’s got no kicking game mate ..
is that why he’s a half .. only has half a game ?
 
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452192) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452178) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452171) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452132) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452116) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452099) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452091) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452077) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452070) said:
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452038) said:
I like that the biggest arguments for Brooks are currently "he's not our worst player" and "he's not the worst halfback in the league"

Is that really where the bar is for Wests Tigers at the moment ?

Long way from the worst halfback in the league but that is irrelevant. Who do you intend to replace him with? Is that relevant?
![line.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601798207-line.png)
![kick m.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601806217-kick-m.png)
![brooks TA.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601814571-brooks-ta.png)

The only two halves in the top 10 for Try ASsists from outside the top 8 are Brooks and Doueihi, wonder what that says? Could defence be the difference between top 8 and where we are?

Ahh the good old stats spread sheet ?

Obviously you were distracted by the pretty pictures Hobbo and you missed the point. I'll simplify.

Who do you intend replacing him with and on what evidence are they better?

Hastings will be replacing him …no evidence required.

No evidence exists.

Imagine the meeting where someone decides....."OK, we need a new halfback, one that we can build a successful team around and rebuild this club........oh there is only one man,,,,.......Jackson Hastings"

He’ll be an improvement on what we have

Maybe.......again there is no evidence that he will be and for mine throwing out what we have requires a higher level of evidence than that

If we can offload Brooks I won’t lose any sleep ..
He’s had 9 years at halfback and done Jack ..
Hastings isn’t coming to play marbles mate ..
Move Brooks to 9 or 13
Enough is enough.. it hasn’t worked

That’s the second time you have said that about Hastings and I don’t get it. Nowhere has it been said he’s coming to play halfback. And like I said last night, every other player has come here to bludge, why is he any different?

It’s called pride mate ..
 
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452194) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452186) said:
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452177) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452170) said:
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452162) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452158) said:
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452156) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452120) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452116) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452099) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452091) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452077) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452070) said:
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452038) said:
I like that the biggest arguments for Brooks are currently "he's not our worst player" and "he's not the worst halfback in the league"

Is that really where the bar is for Wests Tigers at the moment ?

Long way from the worst halfback in the league but that is irrelevant. Who do you intend to replace him with? Is that relevant?
![line.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601798207-line.png)
![kick m.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601806217-kick-m.png)
![brooks TA.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601814571-brooks-ta.png)

The only two halves in the top 10 for Try ASsists from outside the top 8 are Brooks and Doueihi, wonder what that says? Could defence be the difference between top 8 and where we are?

Ahh the good old stats spread sheet ?

Obviously you were distracted by the pretty pictures Hobbo and you missed the point. I'll simplify.

Who do you intend replacing him with and on what evidence are they better?

Hastings will be replacing him …no evidence required.

No evidence exists.

Imagine the meeting where someone decides....."OK, we need a new halfback, one that we can build a successful team around and rebuild this club........oh there is only one man,,,,.......Jackson Hastings"

?

Such a lame argument.
Hastings might not be the panacea. In fact I think we all know that he is not the next Cronk or John’s.
But he won’t be worse. To be worse he’d have to put in roughly 9 years of crap. I’m betting he won’t do that.

Like I said in my last post, it’s ridiculous to claim he can’t be worse. Look at Billy Walters yesterday. There’s always worse.

I don’t think Walters was any good. But at least has something Brooks does not have anymore - potential.
Oh, and 9 years of sub par performances.

Walters has potential? You really resent Brooks that much that you would resort to dying on that hill? If there was ever a way to ruin your credibility in one post.

Nah not dying up there. I do think Walters sucks. Wouldn’t have him as our 7 either.

Thats the point, who are you replacing him with because there are plenty that COULD be worse. I got shouted down (probably correctly) for suggesting , Ash Taylor.

Ash Taylor stays at the broncos , they don’t go into the heap they’re currently in . He has been poorly developed , and I believe if he stayed at the broncos that wouldn’t have happened as his talent was/us immense , and they’ve always been good at developing the organising type half . He went to the Titans chased the money , got the money , and ate pies for 4 years . And his NRL career is over low because of it .
Sliding doors . Also the signing of Jarryd Hayne was the worst buy in nrl history .

Good summary. He personally tore us up at Leichhardt in 2018, looked next level.
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452195) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452188) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452180) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452173) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452127) said:
Backing a half that can’t even get a repeat set … laughable

He is actually 7th in the NRL for fdo.. shocked me too..

1st for line engaged, he and AD only non top 8 halves in top 10 for TA's, Top 5 for kick metres.

If we made the 8, this thread doesnt exist. If we could defend, we are in the 8.

Yep and the plan to address that appears to be move on anyone that can actually defend at NRL Standard

What’s the point in paying and playing a half just to tackle ?
He’s got no kicking game mate ..
is that why he’s a half .. only has half a game ?

He’s had heaps of try assists this year off kicks ! What are you talking about? The lack of kicking yesterday , to me , appears to have been a tactic to nullify thier back 3 . Worked until they took hitups and ran at the middle third , and Walters’ arm grabbing and Tuki just bouncing off stronger more developed men .

Also we just haven’t figured out where the thresholds are with holding down in the ruck . Other teams have it sussed . We are either too long or short , every week . Seriously we have Gavin Badger , how is he not on top of this . I would make it his direct responsibility to get the ruck speed right .
 
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452202) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452195) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452188) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452180) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452173) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452127) said:
Backing a half that can’t even get a repeat set … laughable

He is actually 7th in the NRL for fdo.. shocked me too..

1st for line engaged, he and AD only non top 8 halves in top 10 for TA's, Top 5 for kick metres.

If we made the 8, this thread doesnt exist. If we could defend, we are in the 8.

Yep and the plan to address that appears to be move on anyone that can actually defend at NRL Standard

What’s the point in paying and playing a half just to tackle ?
He’s got no kicking game mate ..
is that why he’s a half .. only has half a game ?

He’s had heaps of try assists this year off kicks ! What are you talking about? The lack of kicking yesterday , to me , appears to have been a tactic to nullify thier back 3 . Worked until they took hitups and ran at the middle third , and Walters’ arm grabbing and Tuki just bouncing off stronger more developed men .

Also we just haven’t figured out where the thresholds are with holding down in the ruck . Other teams have it sussed . We are either too long or short , every week . Seriously we have Gavin Badger , how is he not on top of this . I would make it his direct responsibility to get the ruck speed right .

The only kick he's got is the chip kick near the try line for Maumalo or Doueihi. He doesn't force repeat sets or set up tries with grubber, he doesn't kick 40/20's and his long kicking is just abysmal. It's the biggest weakness in his game and in a league that relies on pressure and field position more and more every week it's costly
 
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452192) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452178) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452171) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452132) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452116) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452099) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452091) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452077) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452070) said:
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452038) said:
I like that the biggest arguments for Brooks are currently "he's not our worst player" and "he's not the worst halfback in the league"

Is that really where the bar is for Wests Tigers at the moment ?

Long way from the worst halfback in the league but that is irrelevant. Who do you intend to replace him with? Is that relevant?
![line.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601798207-line.png)
![kick m.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601806217-kick-m.png)
![brooks TA.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601814571-brooks-ta.png)

The only two halves in the top 10 for Try ASsists from outside the top 8 are Brooks and Doueihi, wonder what that says? Could defence be the difference between top 8 and where we are?

Ahh the good old stats spread sheet ?

Obviously you were distracted by the pretty pictures Hobbo and you missed the point. I'll simplify.

Who do you intend replacing him with and on what evidence are they better?

Hastings will be replacing him …no evidence required.

No evidence exists.

Imagine the meeting where someone decides....."OK, we need a new halfback, one that we can build a successful team around and rebuild this club........oh there is only one man,,,,.......Jackson Hastings"

He’ll be an improvement on what we have

Maybe.......again there is no evidence that he will be and for mine throwing out what we have requires a higher level of evidence than that

If we can offload Brooks I won’t lose any sleep ..
He’s had 9 years at halfback and done Jack ..
Hastings isn’t coming to play marbles mate ..
Move Brooks to 9 or 13
Enough is enough.. it hasn’t worked

That’s the second time you have said that about Hastings and I don’t get it. Nowhere has it been said he’s coming to play halfback. And like I said last night, every other player has come here to bludge, why is he any different?

Because GNR he has a point to prove and has been given a golden opportunity to do so...
He was a very talented kid....immature...moved to England to work on his game and has matured well,they love him over there....it would surprise me if he doesnt do very well for us....lets just let him settle in and play first before we hang him out to dry.....
 
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452162) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452158) said:
@bigsiro said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452156) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452120) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452116) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452099) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452091) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452077) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452070) said:
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452038) said:
I like that the biggest arguments for Brooks are currently "he's not our worst player" and "he's not the worst halfback in the league"

Is that really where the bar is for Wests Tigers at the moment ?

Long way from the worst halfback in the league but that is irrelevant. Who do you intend to replace him with? Is that relevant?
![line.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601798207-line.png)
![kick m.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601806217-kick-m.png)
![brooks TA.png](/assets/uploads/files/1629601814571-brooks-ta.png)

The only two halves in the top 10 for Try ASsists from outside the top 8 are Brooks and Doueihi, wonder what that says? Could defence be the difference between top 8 and where we are?

Ahh the good old stats spread sheet ?

Obviously you were distracted by the pretty pictures Hobbo and you missed the point. I'll simplify.

Who do you intend replacing him with and on what evidence are they better?

Hastings will be replacing him …no evidence required.

No evidence exists.

Imagine the meeting where someone decides....."OK, we need a new halfback, one that we can build a successful team around and rebuild this club........oh there is only one man,,,,.......Jackson Hastings"

?

Such a lame argument.
Hastings might not be the panacea. In fact I think we all know that he is not the next Cronk or John’s.
But he won’t be worse. To be worse he’d have to put in roughly 9 years of crap. I’m betting he won’t do that.

Like I said in my last post, it’s ridiculous to claim he can’t be worse. Look at Billy Walters yesterday. There’s always worse.

I don’t think Walters was any good. But at least has something Brooks does not have anymore - potential.
Oh, and 9 years of sub par performances.

Walters doesn’t have anything, potential or otherwise. He isn’t and never will be NRL standard.
 
@tyga said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452121) said:
Brooks will end up at the Dogs to partner Burton.


How appropriate. His main attributes are loyalty, timidness, and showing no signs of aggression. I hope he finds his forever home with the Dogs.
 
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452205) said:
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452202) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452195) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452188) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452180) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452173) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452127) said:
Backing a half that can’t even get a repeat set … laughable

He is actually 7th in the NRL for fdo.. shocked me too..

1st for line engaged, he and AD only non top 8 halves in top 10 for TA's, Top 5 for kick metres.

If we made the 8, this thread doesnt exist. If we could defend, we are in the 8.

Yep and the plan to address that appears to be move on anyone that can actually defend at NRL Standard

What’s the point in paying and playing a half just to tackle ?
He’s got no kicking game mate ..
is that why he’s a half .. only has half a game ?

He’s had heaps of try assists this year off kicks ! What are you talking about? The lack of kicking yesterday , to me , appears to have been a tactic to nullify thier back 3 . Worked until they took hitups and ran at the middle third , and Walters’ arm grabbing and Tuki just bouncing off stronger more developed men .

Also we just haven’t figured out where the thresholds are with holding down in the ruck . Other teams have it sussed . We are either too long or short , every week . Seriously we have Gavin Badger , how is he not on top of this . I would make it his direct responsibility to get the ruck speed right .

The only kick he's got is the chip kick near the try line for Maumalo or Doueihi. He doesn't ***force repeat sets*** or set up tries with grubber, he doesn't kick 40/20's and his ***long kicking is just abysmal***. It's the biggest weakness in his game and in a league that relies on pressure and field position more and more every week it's costly

7th in the NRL for forced drop outs, 4th in the NRL for kick metres. He isnt God but this narrative that he is abysmal has no basis in reality (waiting for I see it with my own eyes and dont need stats...).
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452212) said:
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452205) said:
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452202) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452195) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452188) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452180) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452173) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452127) said:
Backing a half that can’t even get a repeat set … laughable

He is actually 7th in the NRL for fdo.. shocked me too..

1st for line engaged, he and AD only non top 8 halves in top 10 for TA's, Top 5 for kick metres.

If we made the 8, this thread doesnt exist. If we could defend, we are in the 8.

Yep and the plan to address that appears to be move on anyone that can actually defend at NRL Standard

What’s the point in paying and playing a half just to tackle ?
He’s got no kicking game mate ..
is that why he’s a half .. only has half a game ?

He’s had heaps of try assists this year off kicks ! What are you talking about? The lack of kicking yesterday , to me , appears to have been a tactic to nullify thier back 3 . Worked until they took hitups and ran at the middle third , and Walters’ arm grabbing and Tuki just bouncing off stronger more developed men .

Also we just haven’t figured out where the thresholds are with holding down in the ruck . Other teams have it sussed . We are either too long or short , every week . Seriously we have Gavin Badger , how is he not on top of this . I would make it his direct responsibility to get the ruck speed right .

The only kick he's got is the chip kick near the try line for Maumalo or Doueihi. He doesn't ***force repeat sets*** or set up tries with grubber, he doesn't kick 40/20's and his ***long kicking is just abysmal***. It's the biggest weakness in his game and in a league that relies on pressure and field position more and more every week it's costly

7th in the NRL for forced drop outs, 4th in the NRL for kick metres. He isnt God but this narrative that he is abysmal has no basis in reality (waiting for I see it with my own eyes and dont need stats...).

It’s called context mate ..
he’s a dumb player !
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452215) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452212) said:
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452205) said:
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452202) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452195) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452188) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452180) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452173) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1452127) said:
Backing a half that can’t even get a repeat set … laughable

He is actually 7th in the NRL for fdo.. shocked me too..

1st for line engaged, he and AD only non top 8 halves in top 10 for TA's, Top 5 for kick metres.

If we made the 8, this thread doesnt exist. If we could defend, we are in the 8.

Yep and the plan to address that appears to be move on anyone that can actually defend at NRL Standard

What’s the point in paying and playing a half just to tackle ?
He’s got no kicking game mate ..
is that why he’s a half .. only has half a game ?

He’s had heaps of try assists this year off kicks ! What are you talking about? The lack of kicking yesterday , to me , appears to have been a tactic to nullify thier back 3 . Worked until they took hitups and ran at the middle third , and Walters’ arm grabbing and Tuki just bouncing off stronger more developed men .

Also we just haven’t figured out where the thresholds are with holding down in the ruck . Other teams have it sussed . We are either too long or short , every week . Seriously we have Gavin Badger , how is he not on top of this . I would make it his direct responsibility to get the ruck speed right .

The only kick he's got is the chip kick near the try line for Maumalo or Doueihi. He doesn't ***force repeat sets*** or set up tries with grubber, he doesn't kick 40/20's and his ***long kicking is just abysmal***. It's the biggest weakness in his game and in a league that relies on pressure and field position more and more every week it's costly

7th in the NRL for forced drop outs, 4th in the NRL for kick metres. He isnt God but this narrative that he is abysmal has no basis in reality (waiting for I see it with my own eyes and dont need stats...).

It’s called context mate ..
he’s a dumb player !

@hobbo is there anything I can say , or if not me , anyone can say that would change your perspective ? Or even get you to give ground ? Not being a smart Alec , I genuinely want to know .
 
It is no coincidence that in 2018 was his best year under Cleary who allowed him to play to his strengths with the odd cuddle. Cleary obviously is able to sum up the strengths of his players and tailor his game plan to suit. I don't like what he did to our club but he was on another level as a coach.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top