mikey
Well-known member
I like him when he's committed - often he's not in a game. Had plenty of chances but unfortunately not consistent enough for us. Knowing our ex-players, probably will go well if he goes to Manly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@demps said in [Luke Garner](/post/1428171) said:Not good enough, imo.
I like him but yeah our back row is our weakness and he's one of the reasons why.
Need upgrades in this position as well as centres.
@supercoach said in [Luke Garner](/post/1428183) said:The bottom line….who do we replace him with
@supercoach said in [Luke Garner](/post/1428183) said:The bottom line….who do we replace him with
@mikey said in [Luke Garner](/post/1428217) said:@supercoach said in [Luke Garner](/post/1428183) said:The bottom line….who do we replace him with
Hopefully someone with 100 percent commitment nd a modicum of realised potential.
Don't get me wrong I think he could be good but just don't see him going to 100 percent with us every week.
@supercoach said in [Luke Garner](/post/1428183) said:The bottom line….who do we replace him with
@supercoach said in [Luke Garner](/post/1428183) said:The bottom line….who do we replace him with
@supercoach said in [Luke Garner](/post/1428183) said:The bottom line….who do we replace him with
@twentyforty said in [Luke Garner](/post/1428141) said:“Going, going, Garner: Sea Eagles reportedly chasing Tigers' back rower.”
@willow said in [Luke Garner](/post/1428335) said:@twentyforty said in [Luke Garner](/post/1428141) said:“Going, going, Garner: Sea Eagles reportedly chasing Tigers' back rower.”
I don't have a problem with this. Can run a good line and can line someone up front on - not consistent enough though.