Madge Maguire - Mega Thread

[BAGNF05]

The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.

If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.

How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.

Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.

This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.

Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.

This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.

What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.

Even a bottom 4 roster can be taught a defensive structure after 3 seasons ..a so called Mechanism was the smartest move the club made to cover there butts as he should never had been given and extension until mid season !

You can give a builder plans but if he doesn’t show up to work………

If the pupils aren't learning, there may be an issue with the teacher.

Typical new age rubbish , blame the teacher when little Jonny sets his house on fire.

Chammas has reported on the mechanism in Maguire's contract extension. According to that article, it concerns relationships with players. The WTs considered this to be of such significance, this action was taken. It has nothing to do with the players as the club made the decision.

Keep blindly supporting your mates. It’s not about winning anyway, everyone should get a medal.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.

If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.

How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.

Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.

This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.

Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.

This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.

What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.

Even a bottom 4 roster can be taught a defensive structure after 3 seasons ..a so called Mechanism was the smartest move the club made to cover there butts as he should never had been given and extension until mid season !

You can give a builder plans but if he doesn’t show up to work………

If the pupils aren't learning, there may be an issue with the teacher.

Typical new age rubbish , blame the teacher when little Jonny sets his house on fire.

Chammas has reported on the mechanism in Maguire's contract extension. According to that article, it concerns relationships with players. The WTs considered this to be of such significance, this action was taken. It has nothing to do with the players as the club made the decision.

Keep blindly supporting your mates. It’s not about winning anyway, everyone should get a medal.

I'm surprised in the rush to whack our players over the head this has been overlooked.

 

[avocadoontoast]

What a mess we’re in. The coaching staff, players, front office and board all suck. Just burn the place
to the ground (figuratively speaking) and start all over again.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.

If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.

How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.

Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.

This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.

Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.

This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.

What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.

Even a bottom 4 roster can be taught a defensive structure after 3 seasons ..a so called Mechanism was the smartest move the club made to cover there butts as he should never had been given and extension until mid season !

You can give a builder plans but if he doesn’t show up to work………

If the pupils aren't learning, there may be an issue with the teacher.

Typical new age rubbish , blame the teacher when little Jonny sets his house on fire.

deleted

 

[pawsandclaws1]

The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.

If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.

How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.

Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.

This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.

Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.

This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.

What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.

It's the mechanism to end his contract with minor pain in terms of payout as reported by Chammas.

Copy and paste it into our playing contracts and we’ve actually solved a problem.

deleted

 

[Needaname]

The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.

If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.

How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.

Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.

This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.

Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.

This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.

What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.

Even a bottom 4 roster can be taught a defensive structure after 3 seasons ..a so called Mechanism was the smartest move the club made to cover there butts as he should never had been given and extension until mid season !

You can give a builder plans but if he doesn’t show up to work………

If the pupils aren't learning, there may be an issue with the teacher.

Or they are studying the wrong subject.

 

[The_Patriot]

Maybe some of the students should be in a grade or two lower.

No use pushing a kid if he just isn't getting it.

 

[Tigers79]

Madge will be retained and there will be a player clean out and hopefully with some more media pressure pascoe becomes the fall guy from the front office
Its the only way forward both on and off the field and including recruiting

 

[Needaname]

Brooks, Nofa, Liddle.

Is it any wonder that these guys have been in the club the longest.
Brooks and Nofa since 2013- juniors before that.
Liddle since 2015 in NYC

 

[jadtiger]

Madge will be retained and there will be a player clean out and hopefully with some more media pressure pascoe becomes the fall guy from the front office
Its the only way forward both on and off the field and including recruiting

I sincerely hope that you are right in regards to Madge.You have to have faith in the process that he is pushing,if that means players dont want to be part of it then so be it move them on.It is a painful but necessary transition to make our club where we should be and not where we are.

 

[old_man_tiger]

Root cause analysis with classroom metaphors. This is going to be the best forum off-season ever!

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

I’m hearing theres a bigger issue at the Tigers which will spill out. The group is split. It has been reported before but there’s a pro Madge camp, detractors and in between. I trust who told me this but again it may not be right and unfair on some players so take it with a grain of salt.

Pro Madge Luciano, Blore, Utoikamanu, Tamou, Laurie, Maumalo, Mikalele, Douihei, Simpkin, Simpkins. There are detractors in Brooks, Nofa, Mbye, Liddle.

The club has to make a decision to move players on, the coach or both. The issues are known and no one will sign at the Tigers. The other issue is the detractors have a word straight to the top causing distrust in the team and coaching staff.

I sense Sheens will remember this happening to him in a past life. I wouldn’t be so certain Madge is sacked.

Management are aware the team is not good enough even playing at full potential but unless they sort it out nothing will happen. If I was a betting man you may see a player clean out and it may or may not include the coach.

There is at least one name in the Pro Madge camp that is wrong.

Lucy? Would have to be off him for BJ’s treatment

Not Lucy but I’m not going to confirm who it’s because it would give someone up. It’s someone on that list that you would probably least expect. It has been reported here recently though

Stef? Just because Parra are going throw massive coin at him, doesn't mean he hates our coach.

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.

If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.

How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.

Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.

This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.

Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.

This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.

What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.

Even a bottom 4 roster can be taught a defensive structure after 3 seasons ..a so called Mechanism was the smartest move the club made to cover there butts as he should never had been given and extension until mid season !

You can give a builder plans but if he doesn’t show up to work………

If the pupils aren't learning, there may be an issue with the teacher.

Most are. There's a select few going backwards. Maybe they need to be sent to the remedial class.

 

[BAGNF05]

The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.

If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.

How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.

Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.

This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.

Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.

This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.

What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.

It's the mechanism to end his contract with minor pain in terms of payout as reported by Chammas.

Copy and paste it into our playing contracts and we’ve actually solved a problem.

deleted

Cancel culture too. What a surprise

 

[BAGNF05]

The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.

If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.

How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.

Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.

This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.

Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.

This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.

What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.

Even a bottom 4 roster can be taught a defensive structure after 3 seasons ..a so called Mechanism was the smartest move the club made to cover there butts as he should never had been given and extension until mid season !

You can give a builder plans but if he doesn’t show up to work………

If the pupils aren't learning, there may be an issue with the teacher.

Most are. There's a select few going backwards. Maybe they need to be sent to the remedial class.

The remedial kids just beat the pants off us

 

[Geo]

The innuendo's are even more annoying as the facts..

 

[pawsandclaws1]

The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.

If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.

How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.

Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.

This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.

Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.

This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.

What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.

It's the mechanism to end his contract with minor pain in terms of payout as reported by Chammas.

Copy and paste it into our playing contracts and we’ve actually solved a problem.

deleted

Cancel culture too. What a surprise

No mate, the article to which I referred is posted on this Forum by a moderator in a separate thread. I am just a supporter like you. It is too heated at present and it is easy to lose sight of the fact we are all WTs supporters.

 

[BAGNF05]

The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.

If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.

How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.

Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.

This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.

Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.

This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.

What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.

It's the mechanism to end his contract with minor pain in terms of payout as reported by Chammas.

Copy and paste it into our playing contracts and we’ve actually solved a problem.

deleted

Cancel culture too. What a surprise

No mate, the article to which I referred is posted on this Forum by a moderator in a separate thread. I am just a supporter like you. It is too heated at present and it is easy to lose sight of the fact we are all WTs supporters.

Sorry mate, I agree. This joint is pretty toxic.

I feel strongly that this is a time for major major change so I won’t hold back on my opinion

 

[pawsandclaws1]

The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.

If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.

How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.

Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.

This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.

Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.

This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.

What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.

It's the mechanism to end his contract with minor pain in terms of payout as reported by Chammas.

Copy and paste it into our playing contracts and we’ve actually solved a problem.

deleted

Cancel culture too. What a surprise

No mate, the article to which I referred is posted on this Forum by a moderator in a separate thread. I am just a supporter like you. It is too heated at present and it is easy to lose sight of the fact we are all WTs supporters.

Sorry mate, I agree. This joint is pretty toxic.

I feel strongly that this is a time for major major change so I won’t hold back on my opinion

I respect we each have different opinions. I just hope it works out for WTs.