MCK

@jadtiger said in [MCK](/post/1175838) said:
@OzLuke said in [MCK](/post/1175726) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [MCK](/post/1175725) said:
He is one of the weak links.

Falls off tackles, really low footy IQ, carefree attitude.

Has to go.

With BJ out I am dreading MCK at center...will be slaughtered by Souths backs. Hopefully Madge can see that.

that reminds me of Lovett in the centres for that one magical 15 minute period.....

Only one person couldnt see it was a disaster,unfortunately it was JT the coach.

He did after about 4 tries were scored because of his lack of pace.
 
He's made himself a decent highlight reel in his time here, but I don't think he is a good fit with where Madge wants to be with the roster.
 
praying he goes to Dogs, plays 15-20 minutes a game and guaranteed to miss tackles or make some dumb errors.

Absolute log
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [MCK](/post/1175473) said:
Deserves his own thread. Cost us a chance of pulling a last minute win with the laziest tackle attempt of the year. Then is the only Wests player after full time smiling and looking happy. Weak as.

Does all that and gets promoted to starting center...by far his worst spot (and that is saying something).
 
I am not sure it is about sooking...In a private enterprise, for example, you wouldn't see a salesperson all cheery and smiling after losing out on a deal..to me, it sends the message that you don't care, win OR lose. I don't think the Broncos players were called sooks after their visible disappointment...?
 
@ElleryHanley said in [MCK](/post/1175725) said:
He is one of the weak links.

Falls off tackles, really low footy IQ, carefree attitude.

Has to go.

With BJ out I am dreading MCK at center...will be slaughtered by Souths backs. Hopefully Madge can see that.

Hope he has a revelation back to last year when he slaughtered the Souths backs on his own to win us the game...he did it to the Broncs as well...anyway he has my support because he plays for the mighty WTs...
 
@TrueTiger said in [MCK](/post/1176794) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [MCK](/post/1175725) said:
He is one of the weak links.

Falls off tackles, really low footy IQ, carefree attitude.

Has to go.

With BJ out I am dreading MCK at center...will be slaughtered by Souths backs. Hopefully Madge can see that.

Hope he has a revelation back to last year when he slaughtered the Souths backs on his own to win us the game...he did it to the Broncs as well...anyway he has my support because he plays for the mighty WTs...


He has had two flukey plays in almost 100 games.

And about 100 bad tackle attempts and misreads.

I like your confidence and attitude. But let's say we brought back Nick Graham and Kyle Lovett...using your logic you would be happy with them also.
 
The worst thing was MCK put Huth off when he had Api covered

I'd rather see us blood the new bloke ...probably quicker than MCK as well
 
@happy_tiger said in [MCK](/post/1176805) said:
The worst thing was MCK put Huth off when he had Api covered

I'd rather see us blood the new bloke ...probably quicker than MCK as well

It’s was Huth’s tackle on the replay
You’re either committed or not.
 
@ElleryHanley said in [MCK](/post/1176798) said:
@TrueTiger said in [MCK](/post/1176794) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [MCK](/post/1175725) said:
He is one of the weak links.

Falls off tackles, really low footy IQ, carefree attitude.

Has to go.

With BJ out I am dreading MCK at center...will be slaughtered by Souths backs. Hopefully Madge can see that.

Hope he has a revelation back to last year when he slaughtered the Souths backs on his own to win us the game...he did it to the Broncs as well...anyway he has my support because he plays for the mighty WTs...


He has had two flukey plays in almost 100 games.

And about 100 bad tackle attempts and misreads.

I like your confidence and attitude. But let's say we brought back Nick Graham and Kyle Lovett...using your logic you would be happy with them also.

Mate I don't care about Lovett or Graham,I just think Madge has bugger all to select from and has opted for MCK,otherwise he would play the young guys,he is coach and he would know more than me,plus he probably thinks MCK can do the job that's why he put him in the centres...
It wouldn't matter who he puts in,I will support the WTs and hope for a win...
 
@TrueTiger said in [MCK](/post/1176835) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [MCK](/post/1176798) said:
@TrueTiger said in [MCK](/post/1176794) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [MCK](/post/1175725) said:
He is one of the weak links.

Falls off tackles, really low footy IQ, carefree attitude.

Has to go.

With BJ out I am dreading MCK at center...will be slaughtered by Souths backs. Hopefully Madge can see that.

Hope he has a revelation back to last year when he slaughtered the Souths backs on his own to win us the game...he did it to the Broncs as well...anyway he has my support because he plays for the mighty WTs...


He has had two flukey plays in almost 100 games.

And about 100 bad tackle attempts and misreads.

I like your confidence and attitude. But let's say we brought back Nick Graham and Kyle Lovett...using your logic you would be happy with them also.

Mate I don't care about Lovett or Graham,I just think Madge has bugger all to select from and has opted for MCK,otherwise he would play the young guys,he is coach and he would know more than me,plus he probably thinks MCK can do the job that's why he put him in the centres...
It wouldn't matter who he puts in,I will support the WTs and hope for a win...


It's Madge's call whom he thinks best, shows we are light in the backs something will need to address moving forward. Prior to the Team announcement knowing BJ suspended i was thinking who would MADGE select and this makes sense.
If will only take 1 missed tackle and Madge will swap him with Tommy T during the game. He is a solid bench player not on huge coin that has won us a few close games so deserves his spot.
 
@Tigerlily said in [MCK](/post/1175492) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [MCK](/post/1175487) said:
lawrence is a better option than chee kam

Yes, he would be if only he knew how to hold onto the ball.

Very cheap shot to one of our most loyal players.

Would've expected better Lil.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [MCK](/post/1176898) said:
@Russell said in [MCK](/post/1176894) said:
@Tigerlily said in [MCK](/post/1175492) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [MCK](/post/1175487) said:
lawrence is a better option than chee kam

Yes, he would be if only he knew how to hold onto the ball.

Very cheap shot to one of our most loyal players.

Would've expected better Lil.

She’s right though

No she is not - more than half the problem was Brooks bullet passes to go a metre.
 
@Russell said in [MCK](/post/1176909) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [MCK](/post/1176898) said:
@Russell said in [MCK](/post/1176894) said:
@Tigerlily said in [MCK](/post/1175492) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [MCK](/post/1175487) said:
lawrence is a better option than chee kam

Yes, he would be if only he knew how to hold onto the ball.

Very cheap shot to one of our most loyal players.

Would've expected better Lil.

She’s right though

No she is not - more than half the problem was Brooks bullet passes to go a metre.

No, it’s because he’s got feet for hands.
 
@Russell said in [MCK](/post/1176894) said:
@Tigerlily said in [MCK](/post/1175492) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [MCK](/post/1175487) said:
lawrence is a better option than chee kam

Yes, he would be if only he knew how to hold onto the ball.

Very cheap shot to one of our most loyal players.

Would've expected better Lil.

From my point of view Russell it wasn’t a cheap shot, not at all, I’m just a realist and as much as I love Chris as a person and a player who has represented himself and the WTs with nothing but the best of intentions I just think his played that one season to long.
 
Back
Top