S
system
Guest
@Knuckles said:Dave Smith is a good man. This will be the best outcome of all if they can agree to it.
Exactly my thoughts on the matter Bob
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Knuckles said:Dave Smith is a good man. This will be the best outcome of all if they can agree to it.
@smeghead said:Fairfax Media understands Smith has offered four repayable instalments of $2 million in exchange for a restructure of the club board. Smith is believed to be pushing the club to install a seven-member board, which would include two Balmain directors, two Wests directors and three NRL-appointed directors.
This is the important information in the article.
Just do it.
@Gary Bakerloo said:@smeghead said:Fairfax Media understands Smith has offered four repayable instalments of $2 million in exchange for a restructure of the club board. Smith is believed to be pushing the club to install a seven-member board, which would include two Balmain directors, two Wests directors and three NRL-appointed directors.
This is the important information in the article.
Just do it.
Be careful what you wish for. This will mean that Wests Tigers strategic direction will align to the NRL's strategic direction unless Wests and Balmain align together.
Whilst I agree the strategic plans should be aligned to some extent, there could be nasty decisions made that some fans may not necessarily like.
@smeghead said:Essentially he is peeved Balmain didn't come to him in regard to the development.
@Gary Bakerloo said:@smeghead said:Fairfax Media understands Smith has offered four repayable instalments of $2 million in exchange for a restructure of the club board. Smith is believed to be pushing the club to install a seven-member board, which would include two Balmain directors, two Wests directors and three NRL-appointed directors.
This is the important information in the article.
Just do it.
Be careful what you wish for. This will mean that Wests Tigers strategic direction will align to the NRL's strategic direction unless Wests and Balmain align together.
Whilst I agree the strategic plans should be aligned to some extent, there could be nasty decisions made that some fans may not necessarily like.
@Mccarry said:The Balmain Leagues club looked at one option and went with it. They did not open up to other bidders for the site, instead they chose to go with the Benny Elias led proposal. Last year there there was an article in the paper on the development process, Benny's involvement and the fact that the club did not seek other options such as a Meriton partnership.
@Mccarry said:Harry is right to be annoyed. We are all annoyed. The process was another example of an inept board. Considering Eddie Obied's (Corrupt politician) son (and prob senior) is mates with Di Girolamo (Balmain board) it is just not surprising that this is a massive dodgy mess. Remember these articles
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/how-benny-elias-put-the-bite-on-the-tigers-20120629-21822.html
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/obeid-helped-to-lobby-for-balmain-redevelopment-20130726-2qpuq.html
It is a credit to Harry that he has stuck with the club this long as a major sponsor with all the smelly mess that is the Obieds involvement with Di Girolamo and Benny Elias.
@simonthetiger said:Wow…is there light at the end of the tunnell????
If Balmain and Wests unite they could overrule the nrl blokes.
WOW!!!!
And what about all the BS telegraph articles about Potter being gone.....chip wrapper is what its only ever been an will be.
@Mccarry said:Yep, fair call. Association is not proof of corruption.
Association is proof of poor judgement. The role of a board member essentially ties back to judgement. The board is the ultimate decision making entity, without good judgement they are just a group of ego's sitting around a table.
@fibrodreaming said:I'm not sure why the NRL proposal is being discussed on this thread - but I have a few thoughts.
I don't believe that offering an $8m loan to an insolvent organisation will solve any problems. Some organisation will have to repay the loan, presumably Wests Ashfield, and why would they agree when they have only two members on the board?
This is probably a bad analogy, but it is a little like being asked to go guarantor for a loan. I was asked once to go guarantor, and my solicitor said "I only have one word of advice - don't do it". The point is, why should an entity make itself responsible for a loan, when they have no effective say in the financial affairs of the organisation that is borrowing the money.
With regard to independent directors, there is no guarantee that they will serve the interests of the WT. As Gary Bakerloo says above "be careful what you wish for".
@smeghead said:Fairfax Media understands Smith has offered four repayable instalments of $2 million in exchange for a restructure of the club board. Smith is believed to be pushing the club to install a seven-member board, which would include two Balmain directors, two Wests directors and three NRL-appointed directors.
This is the important information in the article.
Just do it.