Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
don't believe Buzz remember the Brooks salary goes up and up according to him and Anasta axe to grindInteresting comments from Buzz on sheens.
Compared Gus and sheens role and noted Gus on much more money therefore much more involved in the decision making of the Bulldogs.
Said sheens on much less coin and his role more PR to take pressure of the board.
Sounds like a mess.
So we brought in a Gould like figure but he doesn’t have any authority 😂Basically said as sheens is loyal sheens is essentially saying the call on madge is above his pay grade.
Would it be a surprise, the board bringing sheens back to use as a scapegoat.
Gildart and maumalo have one they call dodge ballseriously can any1 think of a set play we have
Sheens stated he would not make knee jerk reactions in the first year,Basically said as sheens is loyal sheens is essentially saying the call on madge is above his pay grade.
Sheens stated he would not make knee jerk reactions in the first year,
Well as long as his eyes aren’t painted on, making some changes would not be considered knee jerk.Sheens stated he would not make knee jerk reactions in the first year,
most of the sell,sack club board ,unload players,sack coach isint?,it takes time hard work,atleast Sheens isnt pandering 2 the media for quick fodder 2 throw in our facesWell as long as his eyes aren’t painted on, making some changes would not be considered knee jerk.
If what Rothfield said is true, when I heard it, sounded like an assumption, then there's no point in Sheens being there.Yeah said doesn't have as much power as Gould.
If what Rothfield said is true, when I heard it, sounded like an assumption, then there's no point in Sheens being there.
Gould couldn’t be too happy with those dodgy doggy performances.
They are so underdone.
Madge could even end up there as he’s pretty close to Gus.
It might work better for him, not sure.
I'm hoping he has a much more hands on role than what's being reported, I'm not 100 percent if what Rothfield said is true because I also remember him saying last year Sheens was the best signing we've made in years and Sheens himself said he won't make any knee jerk reactions in regards to the coaching, now all of a sudden the story is Sheens role is much more basic in scope, more of a p.r position on behalf of the board. Iv got no idea what's true.Yeah the role is kinda redundant mean it has worked in him Signing good players next year and hiring and firing recruitment staff.
But think he needs a more coaching director role to be more involved. Obviously can't leave madge to his own devices.
exactly, apparently our players arent good enough for any set play or form of attacking structure zzzzzseriously can any1 think of a set play we have