Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@THE POM said:"Asked who made the decision, Potter said: “The then board and the CEO (Grant Mayer) at the time"
Problem I have with this is that Farah's contract was announced in March of 2013, Mayer didn't become CEO of the club till July 26th 2013, So how on earth did he apparently make this decision on Farah's contract ? It was Humphreys not Mayer !!
@jirskyr said:Oh Geo, well done. Facts can amaze.
Why do so many people fire up based on comments from one person, an aggrieved person no less. Potter handled the interview well but who of us can say how truthful or accurate his comments were?
This whole situation is certainly so very grey, so truly muddled and so many conflicting reports, conflicting parties. It's just not as black and white as people are trying to make it - JT is to blame, or Potter was shafted and had no control, or it's all Mayer's fault, wait Mayer didn't even oversee the Farah contract etc. etc.
Why am I even surprised?
@magpiecol said:Water under the bridge. I said, he said. Enough already.
We have a new board and a new coach and coaching staff. Let's get behind them and see how the club goes over the next couple of years.
If there has been no improvement, then we can all start reaching for the baseball bats. But, let's give the some time please.
@goldcoast tiger said:@THE POM said:"Asked who made the decision, Potter said: “The then board and the CEO (Grant Mayer) at the time"
Problem I have with this is that Farah's contract was announced in March of 2013, Mayer didn't become CEO of the club till July 26th 2013, So how on earth did he apparently make this decision on Farah's contract ? It was Humphreys not Mayer !!
If that's true
Maybe Potter isn't as honest as he tries to make out he is.
It sounds like a prequel to a job application elsewhere
@Sabre said:@goldcoast tiger said:@THE POM said:"Asked who made the decision, Potter said: “The then board and the CEO (Grant Mayer) at the time"
Problem I have with this is that Farah's contract was announced in March of 2013, Mayer didn't become CEO of the club till July 26th 2013, So how on earth did he apparently make this decision on Farah's contract ? It was Humphreys not Mayer !!
If that's true
Maybe Potter isn't as honest as he tries to make out he is.
It sounds like a prequel to a job application elsewhere
Potter hasn't atually blamed Mayer, he only said "The then CEO". The editor has put Mayer in there, hence why his name is in brackets.
@goldcoast tiger said:@Sabre said:@goldcoast tiger said:@THE POM said:"Asked who made the decision, Potter said: “The then board and the CEO (Grant Mayer) at the time"
Problem I have with this is that Farah's contract was announced in March of 2013, Mayer didn't become CEO of the club till July 26th 2013, So how on earth did he apparently make this decision on Farah's contract ? It was Humphreys not Mayer !!
If that's true
Maybe Potter isn't as honest as he tries to make out he is.
It sounds like a prequel to a job application elsewhere
Potter hasn't atually blamed Mayer, he only said "The then CEO". The editor has put Mayer in there, hence why his name is in brackets.
Then obviously the editor knew who the CEO was at the time
@Telltails said:@fainty said:I find this article strange. It contradicts himself a little, he says he had no control over the signings of the team but then he says he was questioned about signing Marty.
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
Pat Richards and Keith Luila - also I thought were Potter signings.
@sheer64 said:If I was going to believe anyone in this basket case it would be Mick Potter, the only person who has nothing to gain.
@jirskyr said:@sheer64 said:If I was going to believe anyone in this basket case it would be Mick Potter, the only person who has nothing to gain.
Of course he has something to gain - revenge, save face, get publicity - all possible. Anyone who goes on record with the media is trying to gain something; there's no point talking to them otherwise.
@jirskyr said:@sheer64 said:If I was going to believe anyone in this basket case it would be Mick Potter, the only person who has nothing to gain.
Of course he has something to gain - revenge, save face, get publicity - all possible. Anyone who goes on record with the media is trying to gain something; there's no point talking to them otherwise.