Nice, now people are arguing about Jesus and Christianity over "is capitalism evil" (or is socialism evil).
End of the day Capitalism is Amoral and hence evil by any yardstick. It does not care if people starve, collapse, work 70 hours a week and get no social life. There is no thought, no reason, no intelligence to "The market". Anyone who is saying "the market" will take care of things is relying on an inherently greedy thing to solve a problem, that it does not Know or care about. a 5 year old has more chance of washing it's own face then a market of solving problems.
No one thinks of the cost of Unemployment, of suicide, of the lack of hope for our under 20 year olds. Economists cannot measure the intangible, so most hence ignore it. Thomas Piketty is one rare exception and his conclusions are far more accurate then most (he also uses statistics like every tax return for the last 100 years to make his conclusions, unlike Milton who did not have the same resources and just guessed his conclusions).
You said capitalism is evil, because it does not care if people starve. Well this shines a light on where the problem is with your viewpoints.
Its a fact that the rise of capitalism meant that there were far less people starving than ever before. The prosperity that Capitalism developed ensured that even unskilled workers were able to prosper through hard work and good financial sense. The prosperity and moving up between income classes has done far more to help people avoid starving to death, than the socialist response to make people line up all day for a loaf of bread or a cup of rice donated by the Government.
Ironically, Socialism in practice doesn't not only care if people are starving, it is often the cause of them starving.
But back to your first line … Its not capitalism's role to deal with people starving. Capitalism is a system of economics, not a social welfare and advocacy system. Where is society's role here , where is the community's role, where is the role of religious institutions, where is the individual moral responsibility to care for those who are starving (almost universally as a result of mental illness, rather than economic factors, by the way)?
Because Socialist thinking requires society to become reliant on big government to become 'daddy' to everyone, it automatically shifts responsibility for every aspect of life onto Government, and then society washes their hands of responsibility thereafter. So its the government's role is to treat you like a kid and make life decisions for you, because under socialism you are a means of capital and revenue production, rather than a free individual with God-given rights and freedoms. I'll mention that word 'evil' again.
But the funny thing is that there are farrrr more people starving in Socialist countries than there are in Capitalist countries. Explain that one for me.