Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:Frontloading jirskyr. Theyve been building for a premiership this year or next, that much is clear. They had that really thin year a couple of years ago.
As sheens put it when we had our tilt in 2010/11\. A watershed year. The problem is, we did it with backloading!!
@ said:Some of you guys are like kids with new pocket money, so eager to spend it.
Yes Pearce is a good footballer, yes he'd go straight into our team. Do we specifically need a halfback? No. Do we really want to get into a bidding war for a player in a position we don't need? Probably not.
I personally think Newcastle are going to offer him big bucks, they are dying for a player of his calibre and he could slot in with Watson just fine.
We are better off IMO holding our money until the right type of player comes along, personally I think we need a top-class backrower before any other position.
What I want to know is how the F Roosters are claiming to be a million bucks under the cap with Pearce going. It is evident that is the Roosters narrative, both SMH and Telecrap reporting the same figure this morning.
Cronk for Pearce isn't even a straight swap, it's a few hundred thousand cost upgrade. Similarly Tedesco is at least $500K more expensive than anyone they released.
I'd be fine if Roosters released Pearce and said they were done, but I can't cop that they reckon releasing Pearce gives them shot at another elite $1M footballer. Please. Where is the NRL and it's minimum value contracts for top-tier players, despite the TPAs? Isn't that why Izzy Folau couldn't sign with Parra for $50 a few years ago?
@ said:@ said:Frontloading jirskyr. Theyve been building for a premiership this year or next, that much is clear. They had that really thin year a couple of years ago.
As sheens put it when we had our tilt in 2010/11\. A watershed year. The problem is, we did it with backloading!!
We should throw some money at their underpaid players.
@ said:@ said:@ said:Frontloading jirskyr. Theyve been building for a premiership this year or next, that much is clear. They had that really thin year a couple of years ago.
As sheens put it when we had our tilt in 2010/11\. A watershed year. The problem is, we did it with backloading!!
We should throw some money at their underpaid players.
Do you really think they are underpaid? It may say so on their “NRL contract” but I think they are being well paid. One way or another.
The NRL are not registering Maloney’s contract with Penrith because Maloney let slip that the club was arranging the TPA. Starting to understand?
@ said:@ said:@ said:Frontloading jirskyr. Theyve been building for a premiership this year or next, that much is clear. They had that really thin year a couple of years ago.
As sheens put it when we had our tilt in 2010/11\. A watershed year. The problem is, we did it with backloading!!
We should throw some money at their underpaid players.
Do you really think they are underpaid? It may say so on their “NRL contract” but I think they are being well paid. One way or another.
The NRL are not registering Maloney’s contract with Penrith because Maloney let slip that the club was arranging the TPA. Starting to understand?
@ said:@ said:@ said:Frontloading jirskyr. Theyve been building for a premiership this year or next, that much is clear. They had that really thin year a couple of years ago.
As sheens put it when we had our tilt in 2010/11\. A watershed year. The problem is, we did it with backloading!!
We should throw some money at their underpaid players.
Do you really think they are underpaid? It may say so on their “NRL contract” but I think they are being well paid. One way or another.
The NRL are not registering Maloney’s contract with Penrith because Maloney let slip that the club was arranging the TPA. Starting to understand?
@ said:I’m probably in the minority here but for the first time in a good while I think our forward pack looks pretty good. Aloiai, McQueen, Taylor is a pretty solid back row in my opinion. I think we are seriously lacking some quality backs however.
@ said:@ said:I’m probably in the minority here but for the first time in a good while I think our forward pack looks pretty good. Aloiai, McQueen, Taylor is a pretty solid back row in my opinion. I think we are seriously lacking some quality backs however.
If we remain fully fit, I think I'd take our pack over the roosters.
@ said:@ said:@ said:I’d have Pearce in a heartbeat. Gives us a quality half now with good depth as an alternative when needed.
We're one of the last clubs he would consider.
Yes we are, and considering we're maxxed out for halves as well…but Id love him here too
@ said:@ said:I’m probably in the minority here but for the first time in a good while I think our forward pack looks pretty good. Aloiai, McQueen, Taylor is a pretty solid back row in my opinion. I think we are seriously lacking some quality backs however.
If we remain fully fit, I think I'd take our pack over the roosters.