Always find it annoying when our laundry is aired and felt no different with the possible JAC-Talau trade, the Aloiai stuff and now the recent Momirovski talk.
The club's values are supposed to be Respect, Team and Excellence(I think?) but the way in which some negotiations go down only give off an impression the team's trademark is the exact opposite.
No one wants to read players are not feeling valued by the club, but who could actually blame them when certain stuff is said in the media?
He might not be walking into a first grade position at another club but he's an asset to our club and all I ever want is for all our players is to give their best - which he does - and not feel undervalued or somewhat mistreated.
The laundry is aired by the player manager, not the club. So I agree it is annoying, when the player doesn't get precisely what they want, or the player wants to adjust the terms of their deal, the club says no, and then it hits the media.
I didn't see anywhere where it was stated that Momorovski did not feel valued by the club? In fact the opposite - his value is indicated by a reluctance to release him.
Now personally I can feel for the bloke - he left Roosters to get a start at Tigers, couldn't quite cement it, then agreed to a swap deal in Melbourne, where he again wasn't first-choice. He returns to Tigers and they sign, in consecutive off-seasons, superior players in his preferred position. No doubt he wants to investigate his options at other clubs where he might get a regular start. Furthermore with the recent COVID uncertainties, it is the non-starters that are at biggest risk of missing game time in 2021.
However I fail to see anywhere mistreatment or failure to indicate value to the club. Coach has been frank with the player - you are not first-choice but you are valued to our entire roster. And apparently that's not good enough, with two release requests. One release request I understand, but why ask a second time?
The Aloiai stuff is not related to Momorovski. The player agitated for a pay rise, Tigers declined, then his manager agitated for a move to where one of his other players (AFB) had left a hole in the roster. Not the Tigers' fault that Aloiai was signed to a deal he subsequently wanted to improve. And frankly Aloiai did not have such an outstanding 2019 or 2020 as to demand a pay rise.
Appreciate the response but the gist of my comment is that players obviously aren't onboard with the club's plans with them. (Dont they direct their managers?)
I only applied the mistreatment and undervalued comments as in the background the club has been using the players as collateral (in attempt) for trades over the last year or so. This doesn't strike me one bit as having an appreciation and seeing the value for/in them.
Just think some things are indefensible.
I'm tired of being angry at the media or Ivan or whoever the club or manager it is that we're dealing with.
This is all obviously just my personal opinion and I actually have no issues with others throwing all their support behind the club for these type of things, but why are some ignoring the hypocrisy due to the club's own role in setting it in motion?