@ said:Doesn't look like 130kg to me.
Maybe they were weighing his wallet…..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:Doesn't look like 130kg to me.
@ said:What are contracts worth these days??
We've had one mega-tool tank games that was blatantly obvious to everyone so he could transfer to another club, while playing the emotionally damaged card as well. Now we have a teenager who was offered huge dollars before he even played 1st grade (correct me if I'm wrong on that one), who now decides he thinks the grass is greener elsewhere so he'll sleep in the car while his team mates are slugging their guts out to get his own way!
SURELY something can be done where maybe a penalty can be put in place when one party backs out on their deal.
From what I understand the club bent over backwards to accommodate the young fellow, and he still bails!
Hopefully this is all for the better…Rant finished
@ said:@ said:Well….theres another bloody waste of time...two steps forward, three steps back
If he had a pathetic attitude that didn't warrant his pay packet, maybe they're better off cutting their losses.
Disappointing, I had high hopes for him. At least Marsters slips in and doesn't get left out of the 17\. I couldn't find a place for him our first 17 beforehand.
@ said:@ said:@ said:Well….theres another bloody waste of time...two steps forward, three steps back
If he had a pathetic attitude that didn't warrant his pay packet, maybe they're better off cutting their losses.
Disappointing, I had high hopes for him. At least Marsters slips in and doesn't get left out of the 17\. I couldn't find a place for him our first 17 beforehand.
to me, question lies whether he always had a poor attitude or did it turn in to it within a year.
im probably just speaking out of frustration but im sick of signing people on big money on potential and either they're not living up to it or their potential goes down once theyre with us.
melbourne bloody controls each and every aspect of a player's lives, im sure suli didnt have as poor an attitude as kasiano and look at him. not blaming anyone but just very frustrating of the same things over and over again.
@ said:@ said:@ said:Well….theres another bloody waste of time...two steps forward, three steps back
If he had a pathetic attitude that didn't warrant his pay packet, maybe they're better off cutting their losses.
Disappointing, I had high hopes for him. At least Marsters slips in and doesn't get left out of the 17\. I couldn't find a place for him our first 17 beforehand.
to me, question lies whether he always had a poor attitude or did it turn in to it within a year.
im probably just speaking out of frustration but im sick of signing people on big money on potential and either they're not living up to it or their potential goes down once theyre with us.
melbourne bloody controls each and every aspect of a player's lives, im sure suli didnt have as poor an attitude as kasiano and look at him. not blaming anyone but just very frustrating of the same things over and over again.
@ said:@ said:All good if he fails - but if he excels the message we are sending then becomes "a good move by Suli". Culture changes with success.
Last year this kid was going to be our future. I really hope it ends up being a good move but at this point I am not so convinced. We need to be able to manage and retain our talent not distribute it.
An able replacement will make good sense -otherwise dont share the good riddance mentality its becoming a bit old.
Would you be happy if one of your colleagues was not putting in and getting paid handsomely for it? I doubt it, and just like many of Moses' teammates, your fellows and most likely you yourself would want him gone as well.
@ said:@ said:@ said:All good if he fails - but if he excels the message we are sending then becomes "a good move by Suli". Culture changes with success.
Last year this kid was going to be our future. I really hope it ends up being a good move but at this point I am not so convinced. We need to be able to manage and retain our talent not distribute it.
An able replacement will make good sense -otherwise dont share the good riddance mentality its becoming a bit old.
Would you be happy if one of your colleagues was not putting in and getting paid handsomely for it? I doubt it, and just like many of Moses' teammates, your fellows and most likely you yourself would want him gone as well.
Thats a fair enough assumption but this whole notion of not rating and or righting off good players when they leave us is wearing thin with me.
Players will always be transient which is not a big problem if you replace them with better ones or even ones just as good.
If we sign someone who is of equal ability to replace him I will be accept that, but until then, I see this as nothing more than a good decision for the Dogs.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:All good if he fails - but if he excels the message we are sending then becomes "a good move by Suli". Culture changes with success.
Last year this kid was going to be our future. I really hope it ends up being a good move but at this point I am not so convinced. We need to be able to manage and retain our talent not distribute it.
An able replacement will make good sense -otherwise dont share the good riddance mentality its becoming a bit old.
Would you be happy if one of your colleagues was not putting in and getting paid handsomely for it? I doubt it, and just like many of Moses' teammates, your fellows and most likely you yourself would want him gone as well.
Thats a fair enough assumption but this whole notion of not rating and or righting off good players when they leave us is wearing thin with me.
Players will always be transient which is not a big problem if you replace them with better ones or even ones just as good.
If we sign someone who is of equal ability to replace him I will be accept that, but until then, I see this as nothing more than a good decision for the Dogs.
Boo hoo!
@ said:Someone earlier said we should never sign a player named Moses again.
I agree.
The Bibles Moses parts the sea.
Our Moses' parts company with us.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Would you be happy if one of your colleagues was not putting in and getting paid handsomely for it? I doubt it, and just like many of Moses' teammates, your fellows and most likely you yourself would want him gone as well.
Thats a fair enough assumption but this whole notion of not rating and or righting off good players when they leave us is wearing thin with me.
Players will always be transient which is not a big problem if you replace them with better ones or even ones just as good.
If we sign someone who is of equal ability to replace him I will be accept that, but until then, I see this as nothing more than a good decision for the Dogs.
Boo hoo!
Yep - and you keep trying to convince your self its a good thing for the club to lose talented players to other clubs.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Would you be happy if one of your colleagues was not putting in and getting paid handsomely for it? I doubt it, and just like many of Moses' teammates, your fellows and most likely you yourself would want him gone as well.
Thats a fair enough assumption but this whole notion of not rating and or righting off good players when they leave us is wearing thin with me.
Players will always be transient which is not a big problem if you replace them with better ones or even ones just as good.
If we sign someone who is of equal ability to replace him I will be accept that, but until then, I see this as nothing more than a good decision for the Dogs.
Boo hoo!
Yep - and you keep trying to convince your self its a good thing for the club to lose talented players to other clubs.