Nathan Cleary

@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Mate, you were caught out not having thought that snide dig all the way through. Move on.

Let’s see how the cookie crumbles with this Penrith kid….

I bet you my house he’ll be better than brooks after 99 games ..
Most decent clubs would have MOVED on brooks after 50 games ..,!

Bingo, we over rate our juniors, and just keep telling ourselves they will come good, even if it has been 5 years and 100 games, we are still prepared to wait, no wonder we are never in the finals :brick:

Brooks would be a qualified plumber by now if he was a Broncos or Storm junior !

No he wouldn't Hobbo. Playing behind a consistently good pack, Brooks would excel. Forwards win matches, the halves create and play off the back of them. We are so in need of 2 or 3 aggressive, hard running, off loading forwards it's just not funny!
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Let’s see how the cookie crumbles with this Penrith kid….

I bet you my house he’ll be better than brooks after 99 games ..
Most decent clubs would have MOVED on brooks after 50 games ..,!

Bingo, we over rate our juniors, and just keep telling ourselves they will come good, even if it has been 5 years and 100 games, we are still prepared to wait, no wonder we are never in the finals :brick:

Brooks would be a qualified plumber by now if he was a Broncos or Storm junior !

No he wouldn't Hobbo. Playing behind a consistently good pack, Brooks would excel. Forwards win matches, the halves create and play off the back of them. We are so in need of 2 or 3 aggressive, hard running, off loading forwards it's just not funny!

My point being if brooks was at a decent club and couldn’t cut the mustard like he hasn’t , he’d be gone !

:unamused:
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Bingo, we over rate our juniors, and just keep telling ourselves they will come good, even if it has been 5 years and 100 games, we are still prepared to wait, no wonder we are never in the finals :brick:

Brooks would be a qualified plumber by now if he was a Broncos or Storm junior !

No he wouldn't Hobbo. Playing behind a consistently good pack, Brooks would excel. Forwards win matches, the halves create and play off the back of them. We are so in need of 2 or 3 aggressive, hard running, off loading forwards it's just not funny!

My point being if brooks was at a decent club and couldn’t cut the mustard like he hasn’t , he’d be gone !

:unamused:

But we aren’t a decent club, so what’s your point?
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Brooks would be a qualified plumber by now if he was a Broncos or Storm junior !

No he wouldn't Hobbo. Playing behind a consistently good pack, Brooks would excel. Forwards win matches, the halves create and play off the back of them. We are so in need of 2 or 3 aggressive, hard running, off loading forwards it's just not funny!

My point being if brooks was at a decent club and couldn’t cut the mustard like he hasn’t , he’d be gone !

:unamused:

But we aren’t a decent club, so what’s your point?

We could be if our halfback stood up ….

.....nevermind
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
No he wouldn't Hobbo. Playing behind a consistently good pack, Brooks would excel. Forwards win matches, the halves create and play off the back of them. We are so in need of 2 or 3 aggressive, hard running, off loading forwards it's just not funny!

My point being if brooks was at a decent club and couldn’t cut the mustard like he hasn’t , he’d be gone !

:unamused:

But we aren’t a decent club, so what’s your point?

We could be if our halfback stood up ….

.....nevermind

My point is that I think Brooks would cut the mustard at a 'decent' club that had a consistently strong pack of forwards. Hence, he wouldn't be shafted.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
No he wouldn't Hobbo. Playing behind a consistently good pack, Brooks would excel. Forwards win matches, the halves create and play off the back of them. We are so in need of 2 or 3 aggressive, hard running, off loading forwards it's just not funny!

My point being if brooks was at a decent club and couldn’t cut the mustard like he hasn’t , he’d be gone !

:unamused:

But we aren’t a decent club, so what’s your point?

We could be if our halfback stood up ….

.....nevermind

Gold, ruffling feathers mate, I agree though
 
IC won't be going to the roosters - new 4 yeae deal for Robinson
https://www.zerotackle.com/robinson-inks-four-year-extension-with-roosters-34543/
 
He is

He's

He is stuck with us

:deadhorse: :deadhorse: :deadhorse:
:brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick: :brick:
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
No he wouldn't Hobbo. Playing behind a consistently good pack, Brooks would excel. Forwards win matches, the halves create and play off the back of them. We are so in need of 2 or 3 aggressive, hard running, off loading forwards it's just not funny!

My point being if brooks was at a decent club and couldn’t cut the mustard like he hasn’t , he’d be gone !

:unamused:

But we aren’t a decent club, so what’s your point?

We could be if our halfback stood up ….

.....nevermind

Your going around in circles….. What the,,
 
IC is an honourable man he's started something here at Wests Tigers which he says is at least a 3 year project wether Nathan joins him we will have to wait and see but that wont be until 2020 and a lot of players will have gone through the mill by then and if Penriff are successful in wining a comp in that time it will put enormous pressure on their Salary Cap so lets sit back relax enjoy what is left of this season and hope we make the 8 and see what the future has install for WTs.
 
@ said:
IC is an honourable man he's started something here at Wests Tigers which he says is at least a 3 year project _wether_ Nathan joins him we will have to wait and see but that wont be until 2020 and a lot of players will have gone through the mill by then and if Penriff are successful in wining a comp in that time it will put enormous pressure on their Salary Cap so lets sit back relax enjoy what is left of this season and hope we make the 8 and see what the future has install for WTs.

I don't think Nathan is a castrated Lamb!!!!!
:roll
 
Gould still coaches Penrith, has the current coach on strings, Ivan wanted full control and when he didn't get it, was given his marching orders
 
@ said:
@ said:
Gould still coaches Penrith, has the current coach on strings, Ivan wanted full control and when he didn't get it, was given his marching orders

100% correct

Know a few Panthers staff who told me how it went down, Gould gave him his marching orders in Harry's next to Panthers, how classy is that from that Dinasaur
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Gould still coaches Penrith, has the current coach on strings, Ivan wanted full control and when he didn't get it, was given his marching orders

100% correct

Know a few Panthers staff who told me how it went down, Gould gave him his marching orders in Harry's next to Panthers, how classy is that from that Dinasaur

Did he at least buy him a pie n’ peas ?
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Gould still coaches Penrith, has the current coach on strings, Ivan wanted full control and when he didn't get it, was given his marching orders

100% correct

Know a few Panthers staff who told me how it went down, Gould gave him his marching orders in Harry's next to Panthers, how classy is that from that Dinasaur

Did he at least buy him a pie n’ peas ?

I reckon Ivan brought Gus lunch than told him the bad news
 
Back
Top