Not all black and white: Wests fans spitting feathers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
Btw does anyone have the wording of this agreement that keeps being cited? I am aware of some basic undertakings agreed to by the Balmain and Wests boards but I can't say I have seen any written binding charter. Gets quoted like gospel around here so I wouldn't mind having a look at it. Can anyone help?
 
@Gary Bakerloo said:
@smeghead said:
Magpies board seem to be handling this in a very professional manner looking forward.

Great signs.

What is the difference? What are they doing now they weren't doing before?

Acting like professionals trying to work with Wests Tigers to make sure this oversight is addressed and does not occur again.

Previously it would have been calls of betrayl, throwing the toys out of the cot and doing all of this without so much as a call to Concord to try and clarify.

A strong and proffessional Magpies board who want to preserve heritage and work with Wests Tigers and understand the concept of compromise for mutual goal is a missing puzzle piece and it is great it is being addressed
 
lets break it down as simply as we can…

WESTS represents the "Western Suburbs Magpies"
TIGERS represents the "Balmain Tigers"

do you see people complaining that 'balmain' isn't written on the jersey?

also, the jersey was YELLOW!!! yes, YELLOW!!... there is nothing foundation about the jersey at all! cry about the colour, not a missing magpie that no one can see anyway..

let go, wests magpies in the nrl are gone.. as are the balmain tigers...
we are the WESTS TIGERS!!
 
@mtd said:
lets break it down as simply as we can…

WESTS represents the "Western Suburbs Magpies"
TIGERS represents the "Balmain Tigers"

do you see people complaining that 'balmain' isn't written on the jersey?

also, the jersey was YELLOW!!! yes, YELLOW!!... there is nothing foundation about the jersey at all! cry about the colour, not a missing magpie that no one can see anyway..

let go, wests magpies in the nrl are gone.. as are the balmain tigers...
we are the WESTS TIGERS!!

x2
 
I love my Balmain Tigers and like everyone else wasn't happy when we were told, for our survival, the only way ahead was to merge.
I love rugby league and grew up playing and watching footy over 30yrs ago.
I remember the days of the Maggies being known as one of the toughest teams and I always liked and respected them.
Around the time of the merge there were rumors of us joining with the eels. Oh O!
I think that could have been disastrous.
Manly and North Sydney had joined and it was falling apart for the Bears. As we all now know, it failed.
What I'm saying is that I couldn't be happier with being a joint venture with the Western Suburb Magpies and incase you guys had forgotten, we were the first joint venture to win a premiership.
Let's give all the Wests and Balmain supporters a fair go. I want to continue to see a Maggie on the sleeve and wear our predomanantly black jersey more often. I don't want to see a repeat of the northern beagles.
We are now the Wests Tigers and I love my team.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
@mtd said:
lets break it down as simply as we can…

WESTS represents the "Western Suburbs Magpies"
TIGERS represents the "Balmain Tigers"

do you see people complaining that 'balmain' isn't written on the jersey?

also, the jersey was YELLOW!!! yes, YELLOW!!... there is nothing foundation about the jersey at all! cry about the colour, not a missing magpie that no one can see anyway..

let go, wests magpies in the nrl are gone.. as are the balmain tigers...
we are the WESTS TIGERS!!

But people will argue that at the beginning of the JV there was no agreement to have the name 'Balmain' written on the jersey, whereas there was an agreement to have the Magpie on every WT jersey
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@mtd said:
lets break it down as simply as we can…

WESTS represents the "Western Suburbs Magpies"
TIGERS represents the "Balmain Tigers"

do you see people complaining that 'balmain' isn't written on the jersey?

also, the jersey was YELLOW!!! yes, YELLOW!!... there is nothing foundation about the jersey at all! cry about the colour, not a missing magpie that no one can see anyway..

let go, wests magpies in the nrl are gone.. as are the balmain tigers...
we are the WESTS TIGERS!!

But people will argue that at the beginning of the JV there was no agreement to have the name 'Balmain' written on the jersey, whereas there was an agreement to have the Magpie on every WT jersey

Once again… Where is this "agreement"? Constantly referred to and never produced...
 
Why so suspicious Yoss? Surely its not that hard to believe that the two boards came to an agreement at the start of the JV, especially considering the Magpie has been on the sleeve for 12 yrs. I find it hard to believe that its just been there for the sake of it
 
@smeghead said:
I think he means so as to assess the language, exact context etc.

Bingo! I'm not saying there is no agreement, it just seems to be quoted by some as if they have a copy sitting in front of them. I'd just like to know what it says exactly.
 
@steve-o said:
@mtd said:
lets break it down as simply as we can…

WESTS represents the "Western Suburbs Magpies"
TIGERS represents the "Balmain Tigers"

do you see people complaining that 'balmain' isn't written on the jersey?

also, the jersey was YELLOW!!! yes, YELLOW!!... there is nothing foundation about the jersey at all! cry about the colour, not a missing magpie that no one can see anyway..

let go, wests magpies in the nrl are gone.. as are the balmain tigers...
we are the WESTS TIGERS!!

x2

x3!!!

As a previous "Wests Magpie" supporter I **don't** feel angry about this issue. :question:
I'll always remember my days as a Wests Magpie supporter but I now support the WESTS TIGERS! :smiley:
I think most people forget that without the merger none of us would have a club to support in 2012! :brick:

A non issue for me :crazy

This is the emblem that means something special to me now!
:sign:
 
As an old Balmain supporter this is what I would like to see. A "Balmain Tiger" on 1 sleeve and the "Western Suburbs Magpie" on the other. The main Wests Tiger emblem on the front.

The Balmain Tiger is different to the current tiger and this would represent both sides of the merged teams.
 
@benji#6 said:
As an old Balmain supporter this is what I would like to see. A "Balmain Tiger" on 1 sleeve and the "Western Suburbs Magpie" on the other. The main Wests Tiger emblem on the front.

The Balmain Tiger is different to the current tiger and this would represent both sides of the merged teams.

I agree - and they should both be bigger than the poor old Maggie is now.
I always thought I was the only one who missed the 'Balmain' (and still cringe when some idiots tried to re-brand us as Sydney Tigers)
 
@cktiger said:
@benji#6 said:
As an old Balmain supporter this is what I would like to see. A "Balmain Tiger" on 1 sleeve and the "Western Suburbs Magpie" on the other. The main Wests Tiger emblem on the front.

The Balmain Tiger is different to the current tiger and this would represent both sides of the merged teams.

I agree - and they should both be bigger than the poor old Maggie is now.
I always thought I was the only one who missed the 'Balmain' (and still cringe when some idiots tried to re-brand us as Sydney Tigers)

You'd never hear the end of it.
 
@mtd said:
lets break it down as simply as we can…

WESTS represents the "Western Suburbs Magpies"
TIGERS represents the "Balmain Tigers"

do you see people complaining that 'balmain' isn't written on the jersey?

also, the jersey was YELLOW!!! yes, YELLOW!!... there is nothing foundation about the jersey at all! cry about the colour, not a missing magpie that no one can see anyway..

let go, wests magpies in the nrl are gone.. as are the balmain tigers...
we are the WESTS TIGERS!!

This.

Q.E.D

inspirational stuff mtd. :sign:
 
@happy tiger said:
I understand that people are upset about the missing magpie and that is fine

But something we really need to think about and recognize is that stories in the press negatively affecting the club or players will effect the players performances on the field

Isn't that the one thing we should of taken from 2011

Starting with the carryover from the Lui incident ,the MacDonalds incident ,the Fifita \Gibbs \Blair issues ,Moltzen issue , The Sheens signing or leaving ,Rhino \Beau to Penrith etc

Strange that we didn't start playing to our full potential until all of these situations had been fully dealt with

Coincidence ,I think not

Those incidents directly affected the players, they were involved.
This is about a garment.
Very different.

''The jersey we wore on Saturday was just a promotional jersey,'' Humphreys said. **''As I understand it, we've had three or four of those which have not had a magpie.** All of the jerseys in the premiership always have, and always will have, a magpie.''

Which jerseys are these? Bar the heritage jerseys, I cant think which they might be.
 
@mtd said:
lets break it down as simply as we can…

WESTS represents the "Western Suburbs Magpies"
TIGERS represents the "Balmain Tigers"

do you see people complaining that 'balmain' isn't written on the jersey?

also, the jersey was YELLOW!!! yes, YELLOW!!... there is nothing foundation about the jersey at all! cry about the colour, not a missing magpie that no one can see anyway..

let go, wests magpies in the nrl are gone.. as are the balmain tigers...
we are the WESTS TIGERS!!

Do you hear people complaining the word 'magpies' is not in the name?
Same thing

Try and respect what others find important…we are all different
 
@innsaneink said:
@mtd said:
lets break it down as simply as we can…

WESTS represents the "Western Suburbs Magpies"
TIGERS represents the "Balmain Tigers"

do you see people complaining that 'balmain' isn't written on the jersey?

also, the jersey was YELLOW!!! yes, YELLOW!!... there is nothing foundation about the jersey at all! cry about the colour, not a missing magpie that no one can see anyway..

let go, wests magpies in the nrl are gone.. as are the balmain tigers...
we are the WESTS TIGERS!!

**Do you hear people complaining the word 'magpies' is not in the name?
Same thing**
Try and respect what others find important…we are all different

no because wests is in the name…

so we've established:
1) u dont see ppl complaining that balmain isnt in the name
2) u dont see ppl complaining that magpies isnt in the name
3) u dont here ppl complain that balmain isnt on the jersey

so why are ppl complaining that the magpie isnt on the jersey?

that's all we're saying Ink. but im not trying to have a go at these ppl because i agree that we all have to try and respect what others find important
 

Latest posts

Back
Top