Lee's fedora
Well-known member
So guessing you lot are taking a hard no to trans athletes?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't see there being that many trans athletes wanting to play rugby league.....So guessing you lot are taking a hard no to trans athletes?
Will consider it when the first female who has transgendered to a male applies to play in the NRL.So guessing you lot are taking a hard no to trans athletes?
Good to know you'll consider it Col.Will consider it when the first female who has transgendered to a male applies to play in the NRL.
Nelson wants them. Must have got some new boots.So guessing you lot are taking a hard no to trans athletes?
Arguing about [This word has been automatically removed]s is all well and good, but nobody likes a snob.but you wouldn't want to slum it away from the picturesque housing estates of south west Sydney I
It’s amazing how flexible clubs can be when it comes down to winning. 😁I can't see there being that many trans athletes wanting to play rugby league.....
I don't follow NRLW...
If Millie Boyle is OK with it, so am I.
If you are asking about biological males playing in a womens competition, then yes, it's a no from me. I don't see how any male could ever feel proud of his achievements if he were to dominate a womens competition. Having said that, i won't be losing any sleep over it.So guessing you lot are taking a hard no to trans athletes?
Suggesting that stryker wears panties is way over to top.That is about as pissant as your last response. Whatever. I don't find the topic of any particular interest, much less sparring with you. You go on continuing to get your panties in a twist about this issue that has absolutely no impact on your life.
Come on Nelson, really?If that ever happens then maybe complain about it then? Given how low the transgender population is as a whole it seems pretty unlikely your daughter would ever play with or against a transgender athlete in any given sport. It's not like a flock of men are suddenly going to redefine their genders so they can be more competitive at sport.
I also don't really see why people think it was so outrageous or gutless to leave the decision to the players. Why shouldn't they make the call? Seems like a bunch of people want to be outraged on their behalf at something that is not likely to be much of an issue. If the players want to exclude them then fine, they can own their decision.
Well said, great post. Someone showing some commonsense.Absolutely a deplorable decision by the NRL....they make all the rules,fines suspensions in regard to the game,but step off making a decision whether a person born a male suddenly wants to be a woman and wants to compete against them for some form of identity....
There is but 2 genders MALE AND FEMALE,you are born either one or the other....if you feel the need to crossover to the opposite gender then feel free to do so,but also feel free to play against your own transgender to be fair to the naturally born genders...
And there is no malice in what I have stated its fact and its a topic that is getting far to much attention in an ever changing world of wierdness....
She’ll support it until her first hit up lands her in the Royal Prince Alfred spinal unit.If Millie Boyle is OK with it, so am I.
No, I look at data and try to make some assessment of whether there is actually an issue or whether things are being blown completely out of proportion. There is a small transgender population of which a small percentage will have an interest in playing the sport at any level. At the competitive level there could be rules that addressed eligibility as happened with Caster Semanya and her testosterone levels. Where there are competing rights and interests the best approach is generally to first try to strike a balance, not just write off the minority group. Also, the people whose opinions I would be interested in if I were deciding the issue would be women who are actually affected by it. Not yours.Come on Nelson, really?
Is that how you do things, 'give it a go, see what happens'
That sounds like our town planners who erected a giant shoping centre before they upgraded the roads and traffic controls, now it's unsustainable.
If this goes ahead there will be opposition and a degredation of womens sport in this country. Why?
Because it's a women's sport that's why, not half and half or whatever the ratio is!
So let's jump right on in there, disregard all the feelings and emotions that most Australians have.
'Yes' I do believe it would have a down vote if it went to a referendum. If it was supported by the majority then I would be very disillusioned.
Sounds a bit over the top?
Well that's how I feel.
It's my right as a heterosexual male with old fashioned values that my family history have died for!
😂😂 she's a tough bird.She’ll support it until her first hit up lands her in the Royal Prince Alfred spinal unit.
Why is it progressive to think voodoo and feelings should be respected over biological reality and science?No, I look at data and try to make some assessment of whether there is actually an issue or whether things are being blown completely out of proportion. There is a small transgender population of which a small percentage will have an interest in playing the sport at any level. At the competitive level there could be rules that addressed eligibility as happened with Caster Semanya and her testosterone levels. Where there are competing rights and interests the best approach is generally to first try to strike a balance, not just write off the minority group. Also, the people whose opinions I would be interested in if I were deciding the issue would be women who are actually affected by it. Not yours.
Again, a small amount of the transgender population would have any intention of taking up the option of playing. However, their whole community gets lobbed into this issue which gets tossed around like a political football. People who have nothing to do with it make comments like "it's women's sport...not half and half or whatever the ratio is". I'm sure that makes them feel great. They already know that there is plenty of that kind of sentiment out there, this issue just shoves it in their face.
You can have your opinion. I am not sure why you think "most Australians" agree with it. The SSM vote (even though it's quite a different issue) would seem to suggest that a majority of Australians are more progressive in their thinking and don't necessarily think like a "heterosexual males with old fashioned values".