:laughing: I swear - some people on this forum wanted us to fail so they could rear their ugly head!
For mine - Bitter disappointment. **We under-achieved yet again**. 4 years running is not good enough. You can lay blame on many people, but ultimately, it comes down to the coach to get the best from his players.
While I can't help but think if Laurie catches the pass on half time - we beat Melbourne. If Gallant slots the goal over, we beat the Dogs. If Merrit doesn't fluke a FG, we at least take 1 point. These are 3 instances, all of which make up about 30 seconds of 1,920 minutes of football that distinguish a top 4 side, from a bottom 8 side. It really does come down to those miniscule moments throughout a season. Every team has poor (and good) reffing decisions from time to time. Every team has good and bad luck go their way. But those 3 moments decided our fate in '09\. Not excuses, just throwing out there how close we could have come to being top 4 - and everyone praising Sheens.
On a positive note, I saw our best defense ever throughout the entire season (bar 1 manly game). Our attack is still as good as ever. I just don't think we know how to win. As a result, we have seen some fairly major personnel changes. I like the look of our forward pack when fit (although we could do with a top notch No.8). And we have sewn our forward pack for the next few seasons. Gallant, Lawrence, Marshall, Moltzen and TNT make for a pretty good back-line too. Once again, **if** our blokes reach their potential, we can do some good in 2010.
I think Tim knows it time to go. Next year, you will see Gentle take on a more hands-on role.