Paseka...

greatodensraven

New member
This is the kind of highlight reel you want to see from your props. Making plenty of breaks up the guts, good offload (imagine Teddy running off him!) & hitting hard in D. Hope he brings this form to 1sts when he gets his chance:

NRL.com predict most exciting rookies http://yi.nzc.am/dnJ3e3
 
He looks like a guy who can really intimidate defenders and make big metres.

Looks like he can tackle hard as well.

Definetly deserves a spot in first grade.
 
He has a lot of potential give him a few years and he could be as useful as woods is now.Hopefully he will be eased into the big time.
 
Paseka is a big unit and has a good motor for someone so big. Looks to run hard and has an offload in him.
I'm excited to see him get a run of the bench wh Ava and JJ.
 
I wouldn't rush him as he's still only 19 but I wouldn't be surprised if he were to debut at some point. He certainly improved rapidly last year and if that development continues to come on quickly then he may get his chance later in the year.
 
@willow said:
I wouldn't rush him as he's still only 19 but I wouldn't be surprised if he were to debut at some point. He certainly improved rapidly last year and if that development continues to come on quickly then he may get his chance later in the year.

Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

I don't see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go
 
@happy tiger said:
Could be a good fantasy choice ??

If you're into that sort of thing…
Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Might be a bit personal to be sharing on a Forum though.
 
@happy tiger said:
@willow said:
I wouldn't rush him as he's still only 19 but I wouldn't be surprised if he were to debut at some point. He certainly improved rapidly last year and if that development continues to come on quickly then he may get his chance later in the year.

Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

I don't see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go

I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to "if there good enough there old enough". Not arguing for and against just asking?
 
@Tiger Come Lately said:
@happy tiger said:
@willow said:
I wouldn't rush him as he's still only 19 but I wouldn't be surprised if he were to debut at some point. He certainly improved rapidly last year and if that development continues to come on quickly then he may get his chance later in the year.

Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

I don't see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go

I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to "if there good enough there old enough". Not arguing for and against just asking?

He missed a lot of tackles in the NYC last year. Not good enough for first grade yet, at least not decent minutes in first grade.
 
@Nelson said:
@Tiger Come Lately said:
@happy tiger said:
@willow said:
I wouldn't rush him as he's still only 19 but I wouldn't be surprised if he were to debut at some point. He certainly improved rapidly last year and if that development continues to come on quickly then he may get his chance later in the year.

Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

I don't see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go

I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to "if there good enough there old enough". Not arguing for and against just asking?

He missed a lot of tackles in the NYC last year. Not good enough for first grade yet, at least not decent minutes in first grade.

You'd like to see how he handles at least 2 months of NSW Cup before we throw him to the wolves

But if he kills it in the trials you never know

The problem is if we picked him and we get a few injuries and we need him to play big minutes it could do more harm than good

I think we pushed Groat and BMM in before they were ready and the results weren't good
 
@happy tiger said:
@Nelson said:
@Tiger Come Lately said:
@happy tiger said:
Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

I don't see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go

I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to "if there good enough there old enough". Not arguing for and against just asking?

He missed a lot of tackles in the NYC last year. Not good enough for first grade yet, at least not decent minutes in first grade.

You'd like to see how he handles at least 2 months of NSW Cup before we throw him to the wolves

But if he kills it in the trials you never know

The problem is if we picked him and we get a few injuries and we need him to play big minutes it could do more harm than good

I think we pushed Groat and BMM in before they were ready and the results weren't good

Fair call. I was never sold on Groat, he was a big boy but i just didn't see it in him. BMM on the other hand i thought was going to be a big part of our pack.
 
@happy tiger said:
@Nelson said:
@Tiger Come Lately said:
@happy tiger said:
Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

I don't see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go

I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to "if there good enough there old enough". Not arguing for and against just asking?

He missed a lot of tackles in the NYC last year. Not good enough for first grade yet, at least not decent minutes in first grade.

You'd like to see how he handles at least 2 months of NSW Cup before we throw him to the wolves

But if he kills it in the trials you never know

The problem is if we picked him and we get a few injuries and we need him to play big minutes it could do more harm than good

I think we pushed Groat and BMM in before they were ready and the results weren't good

Absolutely, Happ. Throwing him to the wolves is the last thing we need to do because of the chance that he gets owned by a big aggressive opposition. I'd rather see him eased in off the bench in the right sort of game, a bit later in the season.
 
U WILL KNOW VERY SOON IF HE IS THE REAL DEAL , some of the best young props have been 19-20 when they have broke into 1st grade. omeley was one and I think roach was young as well and there was a few others just cant put a name to them at present.
 
@happy tiger said:
@Nelson said:
@Tiger Come Lately said:
@happy tiger said:
Yeah agreed , you would only give him limited game time over a few games unless injuries call

I don't see him as a Woods who could comfortably handle the rigours of FG from the get go

I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to "if there good enough there old enough". Not arguing for and against just asking?

He missed a lot of tackles in the NYC last year. Not good enough for first grade yet, at least not decent minutes in first grade.

You'd like to see how he handles at least 2 months of NSW Cup before we throw him to the wolves

But if he kills it in the trials you never know

The problem is if we picked him and we get a few injuries and we need him to play big minutes it could do more harm than good

I think we pushed Groat and BMM in before they were ready and the results weren't good

Roach came up and played in Reserve Grade as a youngster from Wollongong. I recall Peter Tunks attempting to rough him up but Roach stood his ground and delivered punches to Tunks. Both were sent off but even then it was clear Roach would be one of the best and toughest we'd ever had at Balmain. Bruiser Maguire and Bruce Sinclair (from Nowra and West Tamworth respectively) had that x factor which made them stand out among second row forwards. Both were tough and uncompromising and a tackle Maguire put on a Knights prop which left that player convulsing under the posts at Leichhardt was one of the hardest I had seen. It followed Steve Edmed suffering a broken jaw from this same Knights forward (late and high swinging arm of course),

The point is SImon Dwyer was a more recent player with that x factor and no garbage in his game. A tragic waste of a fine forward and man. More recently, Bayley Sironen has demonstrated that uncompromising style of play. Let's hope he gets a chance this year in the NRL.
 
@Pawsandclaws said:
@happy tiger said:
@Nelson said:
@Tiger Come Lately said:
I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to "if there good enough there old enough". Not arguing for and against just asking?

He missed a lot of tackles in the NYC last year. Not good enough for first grade yet, at least not decent minutes in first grade.

You'd like to see how he handles at least 2 months of NSW Cup before we throw him to the wolves

But if he kills it in the trials you never know

The problem is if we picked him and we get a few injuries and we need him to play big minutes it could do more harm than good

I think we pushed Groat and BMM in before they were ready and the results weren't good

Roach came up and played in Reserve Grade as a youngster from Wollongong. I recall Peter Tunks attempting to rough him up but Roach stood his ground and delivered punches to Tunks. Both were sent off but even then it was clear Roach would be one of the best and toughest we'd ever had at Balmain. Bruiser Maguire and Bruce Sinclair (from Nowra and West Tamworth respectively) had that x factor which made them stand out among second row forwards. Both were tough and uncompromising and a tackle Maguire put on a Knights prop which left that player convulsing under the posts at Leichhardt was one of the hardest I had seen. It followed Steve Edmed suffering a broken jaw from this same Knights forward (late and high swinging arm of course),

The point is SImon Dwyer was a more recent player with that x factor and no garbage in his game. A tragic waste of a fine forward and man. More recently, Bayley Sironen has demonstrated that uncompromising style of play. Let's hope he gets a chance this year in the NRL.

Blocker was also given good protection by Kerry Hemsley - not that he needed it.
 
@Pawsandclaws said:
@happy tiger said:
@Nelson said:
@Tiger Come Lately said:
I know forwards are late bloomers but, what happened to "if there good enough there old enough". Not arguing for and against just asking?

He missed a lot of tackles in the NYC last year. Not good enough for first grade yet, at least not decent minutes in first grade.

You'd like to see how he handles at least 2 months of NSW Cup before we throw him to the wolves

But if he kills it in the trials you never know

The problem is if we picked him and we get a few injuries and we need him to play big minutes it could do more harm than good

I think we pushed Groat and BMM in before they were ready and the results weren't good

Roach came up and played in Reserve Grade as a youngster from Wollongong. I recall Peter Tunks attempting to rough him up but Roach stood his ground and delivered punches to Tunks. Both were sent off but even then it was clear Roach would be one of the best and toughest we'd ever had at Balmain. Bruiser Maguire and Bruce Sinclair (from Nowra and West Tamworth respectively) had that x factor which made them stand out among second row forwards. Both were tough and uncompromising and a tackle Maguire put on a Knights prop which left that player convulsing under the posts at Leichhardt was one of the hardest I had seen. It followed Steve Edmed suffering a broken jaw from this same Knights forward (late and high swinging arm of course),

The point is SImon Dwyer was a more recent player with that x factor and no garbage in his game. A tragic waste of a fine forward and man. More recently, Bayley Sironen has demonstrated that uncompromising style of play. Let's hope he gets a chance this year in the NRL.

Is the Sinclair you refer to the young guy who did his knee in at Leichhardt and never played again? I thought he played many years in the juniors?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top