@mikey said in [Paul Green](/post/1467617) said:@kingrobbie said in [Paul Green](/post/1467366) said:@cochise said in [Paul Green](/post/1467313) said:@aturkey said in [Paul Green](/post/1467268) said:@dwight-schrute said in [Paul Green](/post/1467207) said:I must be in the ultra ultra minority because I'd be happy with Flanno.
He still denies he knew about the peptides but let's just assume he did. He's paid his penalty, he's a bloody good coach and his players all supported him.
Don't we give people a second chance?
Morals aside, he's the best coach available. He's better than Madge.
It is more than morals mate, it is about the safety of players.
I know you want him gone too but imo Madge is 10x more of a threat to player safety than Flanagan.
I do subscribe to the theory that he knew about the drug program but do you really think there is any chance at all he would start it again here when every single person/player in rugby league knows about what happened? I agree player safety is a huge factor but I just struggle to think of any scenario at all where he’d even contemplate doing anything along those lines again.
Honest question.
Sorry but that's just laughable to suggest that. 🙂
If you knew the stuff I know it’s really not.
I understand the point about Flanagan though.