GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
As already pointed out, another beastly performance by Sue. Tragedy that it looks like he’s leaving.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:As already pointed out, another beastly performance by Sue. Tragedy that it looks like he’s leaving.
@ said:@ said:As already pointed out, another beastly performance by Sue. Tragedy that it looks like he’s leaving.
I must have missed something - has been told he is not wanted?
Realize he had an ordinary year last year, but I have always thought he is a gun when he is on. Just not consistent enough, but stiil would be disappointed to see him moved on
@ said:@ said:@ said:As already pointed out, another beastly performance by Sue. Tragedy that it looks like he’s leaving.
I must have missed something - has been told he is not wanted?
Realize he had an ordinary year last year, but I have always thought he is a gun when he is on. Just not consistent enough, but stiil would be disappointed to see him moved on
The Pom said 2 weeks ago he wouldn’t be here, then last night a few different people were saying he’s off to Parra.
It’s a funny one, you could argue his form the last 2 weeks has been him playing for a contract. But if he already has one for 2019, he doesn’t have that as a motivation factor. Maybe he’s returning to his old form having been able to stay fit ?
@ said:Finals or not, this year has been great. Such a pleasure to watch our team this year. Unfortunately that slump will cost us, but we have a good foundation of players with a great coach to go onto bigger and better things. Go the mighty tigers.
@ said:@ said:Packer 9 runs for 67 metres, he's getting worse I tell you, he is no longer that destructive front rower that he was last season. I have bigger wraps on guys like Sue, Twal and Grant to be honest.
Man im sick of people bagging rhis bloke and mats. They work tirelessly off the ball and defend their asses off. Our structure is not based in the middle of the field.
Stats are what they are
But those boys make a diff imo
@ said:@ said:1\. Mbye - 98 metres in attack, 1 try, 9 runs, 7 tackles
2\. Nofoaluma - 99 metres in attack, 1 try, 13 runs, 6 tackles
3\. Marsters - 120 metres in attack, 1 try, 1 try assist, 15 runs, 13 tackles
4\. Naiqama - 150 metres in attack, 17 runs, 12 tackles
5\. Thompson - 139 metres in attack, 1 try, 12 runs, 3 tackles
6\. Marshall - 11 metres in attack, 1 run, 15 tackles, 172 kick metres
7\. Brooks - 55 metres in attack, 1 try assist, 5 runs, 12 tackles, 302 kick metres
8\. Packer - 67 metres in attack, 9 runs, 16 tackles
9\. Farah - 18 metres in attack, 3 runs, 36 tackles, 38 kick metres
10\. Matulino - 74 metres in attack, 9 runs, 28 tackles
11\. Chee-Kam - 101 metres in attack, 1 try assist, 11 runs, 21 tackles
12\. Aloiai - 86 metres in attack, 11 runs, 25 tackles
13\. Taylor - 50 metres in attack, 5 runs, 38 tackles
14\. Twal - 59 metres in attack, 7 runs, 15 tackles
15\. Sue - 124 metres in attack, 12 runs, 25 tackles
16\. Garner - 61 metres in attack, 6 runs, 17 tackles
17\. Eisenhuth - 28 metres in attack, 4 runs, 27 tackles
\
\
Possession: 42%
Completion rate: 30/35 = 86%
All runs: 163 v 188
Post contact metres: 477 v 521
Line breaks: 5 v 3
Tackle breaks: 39 v 38
Av. set distance: 42.2m v 35.6m
Av. play the ball speed: 3.44s v 3.29s
Offloads: 9 v 10
Forced drop outs: 1 v 3 (one more for Brooks season leading tally)
Effective tackles: 87.5% v 85.3%
Ineffective tackles: 15 v 13
Penalties conceded: 12 v 6
Errors: 11 v 12
Farah 3 runs for 18 metres.Hmmm surprising.Thought he was better.
@ said:@ said:1\. Mbye - 98 metres in attack, 1 try, 9 runs, 7 tackles
2\. Nofoaluma - 99 metres in attack, 1 try, 13 runs, 6 tackles
3\. Marsters - 120 metres in attack, 1 try, 1 try assist, 15 runs, 13 tackles
4\. Naiqama - 150 metres in attack, 17 runs, 12 tackles
5\. Thompson - 139 metres in attack, 1 try, 12 runs, 3 tackles
6\. Marshall - 11 metres in attack, 1 run, 15 tackles, 172 kick metres
7\. Brooks - 55 metres in attack, 1 try assist, 5 runs, 12 tackles, 302 kick metres
8\. Packer - 67 metres in attack, 9 runs, 16 tackles
9\. Farah - 18 metres in attack, 3 runs, 36 tackles, 38 kick metres
10\. Matulino - 74 metres in attack, 9 runs, 28 tackles
11\. Chee-Kam - 101 metres in attack, 1 try assist, 11 runs, 21 tackles
12\. Aloiai - 86 metres in attack, 11 runs, 25 tackles
13\. Taylor - 50 metres in attack, 5 runs, 38 tackles
14\. Twal - 59 metres in attack, 7 runs, 15 tackles
15\. Sue - 124 metres in attack, 12 runs, 25 tackles
16\. Garner - 61 metres in attack, 6 runs, 17 tackles
17\. Eisenhuth - 28 metres in attack, 4 runs, 27 tackles
\
\
Possession: 42%
Completion rate: 30/35 = 86%
All runs: 163 v 188
Post contact metres: 477 v 521
Line breaks: 5 v 3
Tackle breaks: 39 v 38
Av. set distance: 42.2m v 35.6m
Av. play the ball speed: 3.44s v 3.29s
Offloads: 9 v 10
Forced drop outs: 1 v 3 (one more for Brooks season leading tally)
Effective tackles: 87.5% v 85.3%
Ineffective tackles: 15 v 13
Penalties conceded: 12 v 6
Errors: 11 v 12
Farah 3 runs for 18 metres.Hmmm surprising.Thought he was better.
@ said:Packer 9 runs for 67 metres, he's getting worse I tell you, he is no longer that destructive front rower that he was last season. I have bigger wraps on guys like Sue, Twal and Grant to be honest.
@ said:@ said:1\. Mbye - 98 metres in attack, 1 try, 9 runs, 7 tackles
2\. Nofoaluma - 99 metres in attack, 1 try, 13 runs, 6 tackles
3\. Marsters - 120 metres in attack, 1 try, 1 try assist, 15 runs, 13 tackles
4\. Naiqama - 150 metres in attack, 17 runs, 12 tackles
5\. Thompson - 139 metres in attack, 1 try, 12 runs, 3 tackles
6\. Marshall - 11 metres in attack, 1 run, 15 tackles, 172 kick metres
7\. Brooks - 55 metres in attack, 1 try assist, 5 runs, 12 tackles, 302 kick metres
8\. Packer - 67 metres in attack, 9 runs, 16 tackles
9\. Farah - 18 metres in attack, 3 runs, 36 tackles, 38 kick metres
10\. Matulino - 74 metres in attack, 9 runs, 28 tackles
11\. Chee-Kam - 101 metres in attack, 1 try assist, 11 runs, 21 tackles
12\. Aloiai - 86 metres in attack, 11 runs, 25 tackles
13\. Taylor - 50 metres in attack, 5 runs, 38 tackles
14\. Twal - 59 metres in attack, 7 runs, 15 tackles
15\. Sue - 124 metres in attack, 12 runs, 25 tackles
16\. Garner - 61 metres in attack, 6 runs, 17 tackles
17\. Eisenhuth - 28 metres in attack, 4 runs, 27 tackles
\
\
Possession: 42%
Completion rate: 30/35 = 86%
All runs: 163 v 188
Post contact metres: 477 v 521
Line breaks: 5 v 3
Tackle breaks: 39 v 38
Av. set distance: 42.2m v 35.6m
Av. play the ball speed: 3.44s v 3.29s
Offloads: 9 v 10
Forced drop outs: 1 v 3 (one more for Brooks season leading tally)
Effective tackles: 87.5% v 85.3%
Ineffective tackles: 15 v 13
Penalties conceded: 12 v 6
Errors: 11 v 12
Farah 3 runs for 18 metres.Hmmm surprising.Thought he was better.
@ said:I like how Mbye is coming along.
Very safe under the ball, good defence and I really liked his try and support play - unfortunately something Tui lacked.
Think he will work out very nicely for us.
@ said:@ said:Packer 9 runs for 67 metres, he's getting worse I tell you, he is no longer that destructive front rower that he was last season. I have bigger wraps on guys like Sue, Twal and Grant to be honest.
Man im sick of people bagging rhis bloke and mats. They work tirelessly off the ball and defend their asses off. Our structure is not based in the middle of the field.
Stats are what they are
But those boys make a diff imo
@ said:@ said:Packer 9 runs for 67 metres, he's getting worse I tell you, he is no longer that destructive front rower that he was last season. I have bigger wraps on guys like Sue, Twal and Grant to be honest.
Man im sick of people bagging rhis bloke and mats. They work tirelessly off the ball and defend their asses off. Our structure is not based in the middle of the field.
Stats are what they are
But those boys make a diff imo
@ said:Both Packer and Mats had over 50m at half time, I looked to see how they were doing particularly because people always criticise them. The 2nd half when they returned, possession wise, didn't really allow for many meters to be made.
Also both Packer and Mats are constantly thrown flat passes when they are already at the defensive line, vs the outside backs who typically get it from dummy half and are able to run to the line which boost's there meters made.
@ said:Both Packer and Mats had over 50m at half time, I looked to see how they were doing particularly because people always criticise them. The 2nd half when they returned, possession wise, didn't really allow for many meters to be made.
Also both Packer and Mats are constantly thrown flat passes when they are already at the defensive line, vs the outside backs who typically get it from dummy half and are able to run to the line which boost's there meters made.
@ said:Finals or not, this year has been great. Such a pleasure to watch our team this year. Unfortunately that slump will cost us, but we have a good foundation of players with a great coach to go onto bigger and better things. Go the mighty tigers.