gallagher
Well-known member
@Abraham said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1014226) said:@watersider The complicating factor in grandfathering this policy would be that Shorten wouldn't have received the immediate tax grab he was after ... he would have had to wait until all these retirees died off and their Super distributed to Beneficiaries.
My main issues with the policy is moving the goal posts after people have played by the rules their whole lives, and punishing them in retirement when they don't have another 30 or 40 years to re-establish themselves financially.
And yes, wealthy retirees can also utilise these same franking credits refunds. The rules are the same for all taxpayers, regardless of underlying wealth. I don't have statistics as to average wealth of retirees across the country, but that's a whole other debate as to whether we punish people for being successful.
As i said in an earlier post, if the policy exempted existing Super Funds and Small Businesses, it could work and ultimately save the government alot of money going forward. Labor didn't do it properly though, they just wanted an immediate tax grab and weren't concerned about the lives ruined along the way.
Ther policy excluded non profit organisations such as trade unions. Funny that.