Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not going to get involved in theories on the who on how a president was killed a lifetime ago, though will say that it is still better content than the constant lefty this, lefty that stuff which had relentlessly permeated these pages in recent times.

Thank you to all that did not join in, celebrate or encourage such.

It’s been good. Crazycat has been great even though we have different opinions. Trent Runcimen was good even when I overreacted about something he said.
 
Meh computer fail. I quoted your top post without actually saying anything.

Going to be a little pedantic and respond. ... Just to clarify, I don't know what happened with JFK, every post/theory here could "possibly" be true from loan nutter fires 3 shots (ballistics has tested this and it is possible), to a small group engages LHO to shoot Kennedy to a larger CIA or KGB conspiracy was afoot. Were only dealing in degrees of likelihood, i.e. Will we see David Klemmer and Paps tackle hard for the Tigers, likely... will we see Nofa defend our line better then these two, unlikely based of past performance (Nofa, prove me wrong Buddy!) .

Yes a conspiracy theory is more "exciting", in JFK's case I also believe it more likely.

"The CIA would not collectively decide to murder their president." Have you read Brig General Smedley Butler's business plot? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler#Business_Plot
I give this weight as, Smedley is actually testifying that this was told to him. (it isn't second or third hand). Butler is a General. I believe some in the USA would actually do this and 2022 doesn't contradict that.

We know the USA has been active in subverting elections overseas (as has Russia, Britain, etc. France as a colonial power was ruthless)... With Britain those lessons returned home, why not America?

1960's America is a different period of time, it's "Red's under beds"? Half of Hollywood was locked up by Joe McCarthy in his Terrorist style witch hunts... Hoover is vicious in arresting people and a lot of people thought Kennedy wasn't Anti-Communist enough!?

It doesn't have to be the entire CIA, someone like Guy Banister would have found a few loyal anti-communists to conduct the hit.


You are right, people would have to keep their lips sealed. A lot of people however have died in relation to Kennedy's assassination, was that to seal their lips??


We don't know and we won't know.
Great post.

Just goes to show "democracy " gets "red lined " somehow.

Funny how  events sidelined the most popular democratically elected leaders from both the left and right.

And then the cycle of war, recession and witch hunts return just when the popular leaders were making a difference.
 
Not going to get involved in theories on the who on how a president was killed a lifetime ago, though will say that it is still better content than the constant lefty this, lefty that stuff which had relentlessly permeated these pages in recent times.

Thank you to all that did not join in, celebrate or encourage such.
That’s big of you to come in here spruiking after getting someone banned. Well done. Could never go head to head with him in a debate.
From what I understand, you are in your 50’s as well? Time to grow up.
 
But why would the Mob give a crap to blackmail Ruby into doing that? You’re missing my point. I’m saying why would the mob do that when they’ve got any number of actual mob members who would do that? And again why would they bother killing Oswald?
<assuming mob and not CIA or whomever> We need someone with access to the station. Jack is a regular there and can walk around without suspicion. He was doing it for months.
Sending the local Don or Mafia strongman to the Police station won't work. Hence they need to leverage either a COP or someone who regularly goes to the station to kill Oswald. Jack fits.
I think you’re looking to bend the evidence to suit a narrative. An interesting narrative but not supported by evidence. It makes no sense to have him make a ham fisted effort to buy a rifle under a false name. Presumably he could buy one himself right? The Ruby stuff sounds interesting but where’s the corroborating evidence?
Maybe I am writing a narrative. Truth is I am not that imaginative and probably repeating what I have read/looked at re the JFK assassination.
Yet the <false name> stuff makes sense. Lets face it you can mail order guns, you are going to kill someone... Do you write your own name, or an alias? (even the dumbest thief writes an alias).

Corroborating evidence... This is what sucks about the JFK conspiracy. Every avenue there is a lack of evidence and evidence has been suppressed.
The Zapruder film - 4 slides, 4 critical slides were "destroyed" in the editing process. Yes old film sucks, but why on earth don't we have 4 mangled slides to reconstruct?

LHO testimony as to why he killed JFK. Oops his dead.
Jack Ruby testimony as to why he killed LHO, sounds dodgier then easts salary cap.

Were not just left with a "we don't know, so we reckon X is the best fit". We have a "we don't know and documents are still being denied to the public". After Obama/Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon/Biden still won't release all the documents around this event. This inclines people to think it is a conspiracy due to the lack of transparency.
Yeah that Smedley stuff is pretty wild!
It sure is. Weirdest part of history.
 
<assuming mob and not CIA or whomever> We need someone with access to the station. Jack is a regular there and can walk around without suspicion. He was doing it for months.
Sending the local Don or Mafia strongman to the Police station won't work. Hence they need to leverage either a COP or someone who regularly goes to the station to kill Oswald. Jack fits.

Maybe I am writing a narrative. Truth is I am not that imaginative and probably repeating what I have read/looked at re the JFK assassination.
Yet the <false name> stuff makes sense. Lets face it you can mail order guns, you are going to kill someone... Do you write your own name, or an alias? (even the dumbest thief writes an alias).

Corroborating evidence... This is what sucks about the JFK conspiracy. Every avenue there is a lack of evidence and evidence has been suppressed.
The Zapruder film - 4 slides, 4 critical slides were "destroyed" in the editing process. Yes old film sucks, but why on earth don't we have 4 mangled slides to reconstruct?

LHO testimony as to why he killed JFK. Oops his dead.
Jack Ruby testimony as to why he killed LHO, sounds dodgier then easts salary cap.

Were not just left with a "we don't know, so we reckon X is the best fit". We have a "we don't know and documents are still being denied to the public". After Obama/Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon/Biden still won't release all the documents around this event. This inclines people to think it is a conspiracy due to the lack of transparency.

It sure is. Weirdest part of history.
Hard to imagine Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon keeping it under wraps to avoid revealing a conspiracy. I'd imagine that the real reason is far more prosaic and to do with methodologies or privacy. Again this doesn't mean there's some conspiracy being hidden - that's speculative.

Virtually anyone could have got into that garage. The security was non-existent.

A lack of evidence is not necessarily evidence of a conspiracy. There's no evidence Zapruders film was tampered with. In fact the authorities pleaded for anyone with footage to provide it and others aside from him. As it is the footage corresponds to the shots coming from Oswald.
 
I thought this was pretty crazy tbh...not sure of its significance though. But the date/timing is uncanny.

Just shows how much RFK was investigating LBJ...


1671972086342.png
 

Attachments

  • 1671971953369.png
    1671971953369.png
    412.7 KB · Views: 2
Last edited:
Hard to imagine Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon keeping it under wraps to avoid revealing a conspiracy. I'd imagine that the real reason is far more prosaic and to do with methodologies or privacy. Again this doesn't mean there's some conspiracy being hidden - that's speculative.

Virtually anyone could have got into that garage. The security was non-existent.

A lack of evidence is not necessarily evidence of a conspiracy. There's no evidence Zapruders film was tampered with. In fact the authorities pleaded for anyone with footage to provide it and others aside from him. As it is the footage corresponds to the shots coming from Oswald.

4 frames of the Zapruder film were destroyed, the excuse given was editing which is semi believable semi not. They are the 4 frames when the shooting occurred. NOTE: no remnants, no scrunched up film... just GONE.

Security was lax around the police station, but not totally lax. A crowd of reporters have gathered, no guarantee Reporters would be allowed near LHO. Remember that people did not know LHO would be shot in the garage, Ruby was a person who was known around the station and had Mob connections. Ruby does not raise suspicion.

but hey were in a loop here.

Look, were just going to agree to disagree. Which is fine.

We have two possibilities:
1. LHO acted alone, kills JFK by getting off 3 shots ( Yes this is possible) ill include Colin M's idea of a bodyguard shooting JFK once by mistake with his AR-15. Jack Ruby then acts alone, kills LHO for "reasons"??

2. LHO conspires with a small group, including David F. Clem Bertrant and co planning the assassination. LHO and another shooter get off 3 shots between them. Jack Ruby is then Heavied/blackmailed/Hypnotized to shoot LHO (leading to Ruby's poor explanation) and a coverup ensues.

I believe NR2, I respect your reasoning in accepting NR1.


Look, I don't highly rate the idea Oswald shot Kennedy for "fame". When you goto Russia for 2 years, start a communist branch, your either acting under the CIA as a covert operative OR you are trying to start a communist XYZ...

Were at the "agree to disagree" part and I learned a little listening to everyone comment.
 
4 frames of the Zapruder film were destroyed, the excuse given was editing which is semi believable semi not. They are the 4 frames when the shooting occurred. NOTE: no remnants, no scrunched up film... just GONE.

Security was lax around the police station, but not totally lax. A crowd of reporters have gathered, no guarantee Reporters would be allowed near LHO. Remember that people did not know LHO would be shot in the garage, Ruby was a person who was known around the station and had Mob connections. Ruby does not raise suspicion.

but hey were in a loop here.

Look, were just going to agree to disagree. Which is fine.

We have two possibilities:
1. LHO acted alone, kills JFK by getting off 3 shots ( Yes this is possible) ill include Colin M's idea of a bodyguard shooting JFK once by mistake with his AR-15. Jack Ruby then acts alone, kills LHO for "reasons"??

2. LHO conspires with a small group, including David F. Clem Bertrant and co planning the assassination. LHO and another shooter get off 3 shots between them. Jack Ruby is then Heavied/blackmailed/Hypnotized to shoot LHO (leading to Ruby's poor explanation) and a coverup ensues.

I believe NR2, I respect your reasoning in accepting NR1.


Look, I don't highly rate the idea Oswald shot Kennedy for "fame". When you goto Russia for 2 years, start a communist branch, your either acting under the CIA as a covert operative OR you are trying to start a communist XYZ...

Were at the "agree to disagree" part and I learned a little listening to everyone comment.

To be clear, the frames weren’t destroyed. A copy of the film was mangled by the Life magazine technician. Extant copies exist and have been released. So that part is simply incorrect.

Again for clarity, reason 1 above is not 100% my view. The idea that a bodyguard accidentally shot Kennedy is ridiculously implausible. It makes the grassy knoll shooter look reasonable by comparison. The rest is accurate. The shots fired are demonstrably doable. Three shots. The problem with 2 is the evidence simply doesn’t support it.

The security was terrible. It wasn’t hard to get in. Regardless none of this is evidence Ruby was anything more than someone who knew a lot of people.

You’re asking to evaluate the reason or reasons a mentally unstable man shot the president. Everything is going to be speculative. As I’ve noted earlier, many assassins have ridiculous reasons for doing these things. Hinkley want to impress Jodie Foster. Garfield’s assassin had some bizarre gripe against him. Plenty of spree killers do so to be someone. Did Oswald think Kennedy was a fascist, a threat to Cuba? Was he a nobody who wanted to be someone? Maybe. Who knows. There’s just nothing to substantiate he was working with anyone. Certainly the idea he was a CIA operative is simply not supported by evidence.
 
I think The Z film has been altered from the original. Look up Dino Brugginoni if you get the chance - he anaylsed the original film. A key issue with film is the blurring of the head shot and also the limo stopped. But in the Z film it only looks like it slowed down.

* Bill Newman (eyewitness) to the right of the car consistently told people the car stopped for about 2 seconds.
* Jean Hill had an affidavit saying she heard shots then car stops then more shots.
Hugh Betsner was taking photos on the day and also executed an affidavit about the car stopping.
* Bobby Hargis the motor cycle cop who was splattered with brain matter - he said in Richard Trasks book (forgot name) talks about car stopping.


RE: Oswald shooting jfk i don't believe she shot anyone that day.

Security was lax around the police station, but not totally lax. A crowd of reporters have gathered, no guarantee Reporters would be allowed near LHO. Remember that people did not know LHO would be shot in the garage, Ruby was a person who was known around the station and had Mob connections. Ruby does not raise suspicion.

Agreed. Jack Rubeinstein was very well known with the Dallas police and was also outside the hospital when jfk was brought into parkland hospital. Also reminds me the limo got cleaned out when it was a crime scene...

Look, I don't highly rate the idea Oswald shot Kennedy for "fame". When you goto Russia for 2 years, start a communist branch, your either acting under the CIA as a covert operative OR you are trying to start a communist XYZ...

Yeah definitely man, if he was after fame why would he say "he's a patsy!"?

there are so many rabbit holes we could go down with this topic. I.e.
- the autopsy cover up,
- medical records being burned.
- testimony of the doctors and nurses at Parkland Hospital
- The Mob/ New Orleans and Carlos Marcello's connection to the murder (jim garrison); Jack Ruby and Dorothy Killgallen's investigation of RUby and New Orleans,
- The National security state's involvement.
- Hoover.
- Z Film
- LBJ's career was on the line
- The disappearance of the limousine after JFK arrived at the hospital.
- Cuba- Operation Moongoose; Operation Northwoods (Ed Landsdale), General Max Taylor
- The KGB and their investigation which put the assassination on LBJ

Definately have to agree to disagree with others like Yoss but imo kennedy’s assassination was not the random act of a line malcontent, devoid of meaning or political consequences; Rather, a domestic coup d’etat, carried out by a cabal of individuals representing elements of the national security state, in reaction to JFKs foreign and military policy which was covered up by elements of the US federal Government. Nice chat fellas

Just to tick off a few things here:

The car clearly never stops. As I noted previously the Zapruder film is not the only video. If the car stopped the motorcycle cops behind would have hit the limo. The guy is clearly wrong, there were hundreds of people there - if it stopped others would say so.

The limo was thoroughly examined and photographed afterwards. This is clearly documented.

The testimony of the medical staff is clearly on record. Re the allegedly destroyed notes, I assume we’re talking about Humes? He chose to destroy them… after he made a copy.

I don’t know about Johnson’s career being on the line. He was in poll position to be the Democratic candidate in 1968.
 
Just to tick off a few things here:

The car clearly never stops. As I noted previously the Zapruder film is not the only video. If the car stopped the motorcycle cops behind would have hit the limo. The guy is clearly wrong, there were hundreds of people there - if it stopped others would say so.
Odd, reading an exerpt of the Colin McLaren book. His entire theory is pegged on the motorcade stopping. This (by his theory which I ... Kinda don't rate) relies on the change in velocity to disturb an agent with an AR-15.

From memory the Motorcade slows down and they are a bit confused... Then they speed off after about 6 seconds.

Anyway I only reposted as I thought LSD + JFK and LHO would be a fun discussion. ..
 
Odd, reading an exerpt of the Colin McLaren book. His entire theory is pegged on the motorcade stopping. This (by his theory which I ... Kinda don't rate) relies on the change in velocity to disturb an agent with an AR-15.

From memory the Motorcade slows down and they are a bit confused... Then they speed off after about 6 seconds.

Anyway I only reposted as I thought LSD + JFK and LHO would be a fun discussion. ..

I mean they were going pretty damn slowly to begin with but yeah they hesitate before someone (I think the secret service guy on the boot) tells them to floor it. I also would like to think the secret service employs people who don’t shoot their guns every time the car breaks.

It’s been an interesting discussion. There are some interesting and still not well understood aspects of all this. For what it’s worth Ruby on his deathbed said it was him and nobody else was involved with him killing Oswald.
 
Not going to get involved in theories on the who on how a president was killed a lifetime ago, though will say that it is still better content than the constant lefty this, lefty that stuff which had relentlessly permeated these pages in recent times.

Thank you to all that did not join in, celebrate or encourage such.
I can't tell if you are a lefty-lefty or a righty-righty...

Because the righty righty's hate the lefty lefty's as much as the other hates the first.....

It's Red's vs Blues and Blues vs Red's because you don't want to be a Blue right?

Australia is rightfully OVER IT ALL.

As they should be. Football is for cheerleading and saying your team is hard done by. Politics is not time to be a follower...

It's time to be BOSS!

Vote for people who will do what you want and say OR will help people you think need helping.
Never vote for anyone who is "team A" promising to kick "team B" or vice versa.
Our system is great because we get multiple parties and we get issues discussed. America it's dumb N dumber over there, the few good people regularly getting thwarted.

None of this is meant to be a disparage to you Tim Sheens. Heck I love your work, ok you weren't the best at winning games but boy you made it exciting... Infact I think we agree, this lefty left vs righty right BS is just Boring. I am adding that leaves US left right out.

It's Democracy, were meant to be the boss of this process.
 
So something a little different:

NSW Dom P is pushing for a few reforms with Clubs and pokies... I expect this to get quite heated and the WT in the middle of a few clubs...

In short I see two clear changes being introduced:
1. Cashless cards to track problem gamblers.
2. a ban on Clubs and pubs donating to political campaigns.

I am unclear what Chris M's stance is on all this...
Yes I will recognise the good work clubs do, in part they are a haven for some people. Other times, Man they make kids sports like Rolls Royce events. Seriously not every team needs a uniform nor a printed Uniform.

Having seen Gambling additions not just ruin a person, but ruin the family of that same person... It's about time we see some action on this!
 
Having seen Gambling additions not just ruin a person, but ruin the family of that same person... It's about time we see some action on this!

What do you do though ? I have a good friend who is a gambling addict. He has been earning good dollars and he doesn't have a wife and kids so it's all sort of been okay but it's bad.

The bank sometimes stops his accounts because they must see so much spending happening.

He told me he manages being in a hole via doubling down on the favourite until he gets a win. In his words it's unusual for the favourite to lose multiple times in a row.

He is also an alcoholic.

Top guy but he has an addictive personality.
 
What do you do though ? I have a good friend who is a gambling addict. He has been earning good dollars and he doesn't have a wife and kids so it's all sort of been okay but it's bad.

The bank sometimes stops his accounts because they must see so much spending happening.

He told me he manages being in a hole via doubling down on the favourite until he gets a win. In his words it's unusual for the favourite to lose multiple times in a row.

He is also an alcoholic.

Top guy but he has an addictive personality.
Earl,I honestly think that the system went wrong when they allowed the pubs to have pokies..When the clubs had them you came to a club as a guest and had a night out with the member and you could play the pokies on that occasion,it was a night out..
When the pubs got pokies they became gambling dens,no sign in or member required to enter,it was a free for all from the time they opened their doors to closing time..
I have worked in hospitality for 48 years (pubs and clubs as management and supervisor roles)I have seen the damage first hand with gambling addiction,hence why they had to bring in the Responsible Service of Alcohol and the Responsible Conduct of Gaming legislations...
In the words of an owner I once worked for who owned 3 reasonably sized Hotels at the one time "the pokies are great,its like having a license to print money"...
and of course the govt revenue was at an all time high...so in my opinion from govt to owner there clearly was nothing more than greed from either side,principles and morals went out the window until the legislations were put in place even with these there still is a lot of problem gambling within our communities..
 
"the pokies are great,its like having a license to print money"...
and of course the govt revenue was at an all time high...so in my opinion from govt to owner there clearly was nothing more than greed from either side,principles and morals went out the window until the legislations were put in place even with these there still is a lot of problem gambling within our communities..

My concern about stopping gambling is that so many things in society are funded via gambling.

People will just gamble on line as well. If we shut down the gambling in Australia people will just use overseas gambling companies.

It's the same as drugs but it's even worse because we allow alcohol. I drink as well.

I don't have an answer.
 
My concern about stopping gambling is that so many things in society are funded via gambling.

People will just gamble on line as well. If we shut down the gambling in Australia people will just use overseas gambling companies.

It's the same as drugs but it's even worse because we allow alcohol. I drink as well.

I don't have an answer.
I think thats the trouble Earl,we have gone down the gaming path for a long while now because of the revenue it raises,whether pokies horses etc that there is a very hard way to curb it because everyone is so used to it now its part of life..

I can remember when races were Weds and Sat now its everyday 24/7 with overseas racing...
 
My concern about stopping gambling is that so many things in society are funded via gambling.

People will just gamble on line as well. If we shut down the gambling in Australia people will just use overseas gambling companies.

It's the same as drugs but it's even worse because we allow alcohol. I drink as well.

I don't have an answer.
When acting, you will always find a loophole.

That is fine, you close the loophole.

Poker machines are addictive, there is going to be online gambling that is way more addictive. Yes people will switch online, then people can legislate heavier online. ... You see we have these great things called Banks and banks can stop transactions going to strange places.

Problems can take multiple solutions to fix. This is fine!




BTW were not talking removing gambling from clubs, IMHO I would prefer the government fight online gambling and tackle it (I know federal issue) ahead of tackling the clubs. Ill take what I can get.

I suspect Dominic P's Catholic sensibilities have kicked in on gambling. Surprised he is tacking it but good to see.
 
Seeing that this young autistic woman has been attacked on these pages so many times, from when a young teenager through until soon leaving her teens, thought it appropriate to post this misogynistic prick also having a go at her.

So great to see this type of guy totally owned with well over 200 million tweet views already and counting, of something he will forever be remembered for.


Screenshot_20221230-142058_Gallery.jpg
 
Last edited:
Seeing that this young autistic woman has been attacked on these pages so many times, from when a young teenager through until soon leaving her teens, thought it appropriate to post this misogynistic prick also having a go at her.

So great to see this type of guy totally owned with well over 2 million tweet views already and counting, of something he will forever be remembered for.


View attachment 3922
Likely better remembered for the rape and human trafficking charges:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top