Questions being asked of CEO

Snake

New member
On 9 the interview with Farah was edited not to reveal that Farrah supported the coach ..now questions are being asked of the CEO why the editing was done and later added to the Website . There seems some very dirty deeds are going on.
 
Maybe Mayer does not get on with Potter, he has the power to say yes or no to renewing Potters contract and also is in a position to leak info to the media and as the OP mentioned also manipulate what is published.
 
Mayer comes across as a knee jerking type of CEO..very reactive and little foresight…Look at how he botched up Tedesco's resigning...and now Potter's situation....maybe we need a REAL CEO...not a wanna be...
 
I think Mayer will leave before Potter. Why you ask? So he can find another job before it's to late.

If or when he reads this post, I suggest he grabs a movie, maybe an old favourite, Beverly Hills Cop and just relax, don't worry. Funny movie, we all love Eddie Murphy hhhheeeeeeehhhhhhheeee.
Enjoy the soundtrack too, cheer up.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
@Snake said:
On 9 the interview with Farah was edited not to reveal that Farrah supported the coach ..now questions are being asked of the CEO why the editing was done and later added to the Website . There seems some very dirty deeds are going on.

What interview?
Chanell 9?
WTV?
When?
 
@alexaki said:
Mayer comes across as a knee jerking type of CEO..very reactive and little foresight…Look at how he botched up Tedesco's resigning...and now Potter's situation....maybe we need a REAL CEO...not a wanna be...

Grant mayer is the best thing to happen to the club since farah and benji came along.

He is exactly the type of person the club and the NRL needs. Not your usual gordon tallis and darren lockyers who are part of some 'boys club' but have no real business credentials.
 
Grant has been answering questions from fans on twitter since last night. Dont talk shit when you guys wont open your eyes and see hes been very open to the fans. Get twitter and follow him. This is from his twitter account

"Seriously? We cut and edit 15 videos a week. Happy for my guys to put full video up and did so early today. Nothing to see here".

"Just listened to it. It was a press conference! TV and press shot the session. Did they run that piece? An open press conference. Wow".
 
mayer is responding that it was an open conference and that the press shot it. WTV didnt have full footage.
 
@innsaneink said:
Will someone please explain whats happened now?

Wiedler said on,, Ch9 that Mayer edited ta video of Farah showing total support for Potter and didn't put it up on the official website…

Hence CEO has questions to answer???????
 
@innsaneink said:
Will someone please explain whats happened now?

what do you mean?

http://www.weststigers.com.au/news/2014/07/26/press_conference_robbie_farah.html

i think from the 5 minute on mark- that part wasnt on the WT website until now. i remember watching this interview earlier and iirc that part wasnt there.
 
Video edit was a mistake. I wear that as the CEO ie blame me. It's up in full now. RF and club have stated support for Mick. MNF a priority

^grant on twitter.
 
@tig_prmz said:
@innsaneink said:
Will someone please explain whats happened now?

what do you mean?

http://www.weststigers.com.au/news/2014/07/26/press_conference_robbie_farah.html

i think from the 5 minute on mark- that part wasnt on the WT website until now. i remember watching this interview earlier and iirc that part wasnt there.

Thanx Geo & Tig Prmz
I think youre correct TP
I dont recall the last bit praising supporting pots either on the w/end
 
@tig_prmz said:
Video edit was a mistake. I wear that as the CEO ie blame me. It's up in full now. RF and club have **stated** support for Mick. MNF a priority

^grant on twitter.

Theres a difference between stating support and SHOWING support Mayer.
 
well whoever edited the footage out or was in charge of it needs to be in trouble. unless, they say it was an "honest mistake"
 
Somebody decided, or was told, to leave that section out.
The only reason an editor would have cut the end is if there were time restraints on the video - which there obviously isn't.
Speaking as someone who has sat in edit suites too many times to remember it had to be cut out on purpose.
 
Back
Top