Recruitment

@geo said in [Recruitment](/post/1422869) said:
@pj said in [Recruitment](/post/1422857) said:
@geo said in [Recruitment](/post/1422581) said:
What makes everyone so sure that the current roster will play for a different coach...

Shouldn't they want to play for personal performance and some pride in the jersey they put on..

Sure the Dogs recruitment has been out of this world on paper as was the Knights a few year back..it's got them nowhere really..basically they went away from junior development to trying to buy success..hasn't really worked out yet..doesn't look like it's going too

It's yet to be seen if it does at the Dogs..could work..could flop massively..

Building from within does produce results if done properly.. You develop Jake Simpkin to be our Harry Grant, Stefano Utoikamanu to be our Payne Hass, Tuki Simpkins to be our Pangia Jnr and so on.. Sure that doesn't mean if quality becomes available you don't have a crack or even pay overs if they are exceptional quality Brandon Smith like..

Buying comps has never been as successful as building them..

Our club is great at finding and developing promising juniors. Unfortunately we are terrible at retaining them

Tim Sheens didn't have that issue in retaining them... We were only terrible through the Potter/Taylor/Voldamort years..

That needs to change clearly they are putting measures in place to rectify those shortfalls..

Here's an analogy.

You are the best at what you do. You win industry awards. But the company doesn't grow and you can't grow because of it. You look around you and your managers are dinosaurs or idiots with bad reputations. Suddenly GOOGLE sends you a message on LinkedIn. "We want you and will make you the highest paid employee in your entire industry".

Do you leave or stay?
 
@bagnf05 said in [Recruitment](/post/1422873) said:
@facepalmer said in [Recruitment](/post/1422852) said:
We are not an attractive club. News at 11. The reason? We're poorly run, disorganised, have a bad culture. Our best players have to scrape and beg for respect. Sometimes they leave and suddenly they're considered superstars. There are other clubs that struggle similarly for different, more permanent reasons.

North QLD - Location mostly.
Warriors - Also location unless you're a Kiwi.
Canberra - Location.

These clubs have had successful periods, none of which came from massive recruitment drives. In actuality let's look at the last 20 NRL premiership winning sides and see how many of these sides had genuine stars they threw the chequebook at.

2000 Brisbane Broncos - Almost entirely local products and very few star signings with the exception of Gorden Tallis and Luke Priddis.

2001 Newcastle Knights - A single sorta marquee signing but not really because he mostly fulfilled his potential once he got here, Ben Kennedy. The rest were Newcastle products or randoms.

2002 Sydney Roosters - Almost entirely mercenaries. A few guys they blooded that they found from the bush and Western Sydney + Bryan Fletcher and Luke Ricketson make up the rest. Names like Brett Mullins, Brad Fittler, Justin Hodges, Adrian Morley. A genuinely bought premiership.

2003 - Penrith Panthers - Surprisingly did have a few quality signings that weren't produced at Penrith including Wesser, Girdler, Campbell, Priddis plus a few other lesser lights that they signed. Smart signings though and still had a ton of developed talent.

2004 - Bulldogs - I suppose you could say they poached Andrew Ryan maybe.

2005 - Tigers - We know this one. Hobbled Scott Prince and a few other tried horses plus a bunch of Tigers produce.

2006 - Broncos - Brisbane products.

2007 - Storm* - Marquee signing Anthony Quinn?

2008 - Manly - Jamie Lyon coming off a stint in the ESL, Steven Bell and Josh Perry are the only signings at all. Could hardly call any of them marquee signings.

2009 - Storm* - Scrapheap Brett Finch the big signing.

2010 - Dragons - They bought this premiership by buying Wayne Bennett who dragged his son along with him as well as Neville Costigan. Aside from that, pretty much all development.

2011 - Manly - Pretty much no new signings since 2008 though they had developed some more talent that wasn't present in 2008 such as Foran and DCE. Impressive that they won a comp with an entirely different halves pairing a mere 3 seasons after they had already won one. Brought through a new generation of leaders without sacrificing performance. Orford and Lyon even still playing in the NRL at the time. Competence par excellence.

2012 - Storm* - The team that found it so difficult to compete with the salary cap they had to cheat even though they signed nobody because no RL players actually want to live in Melbourne (seriously they all move away the minute they retire). They had no new marquee signings. A few fringe guys they turned into quality like Waqa yeah. Widdop had come through to replace Scrapheap Finch. That's what they do, they still do it.

2013 - Roosters - Another bought premiership by the Roosters though to their credit they had developed a fair bit of talent to go along with poaching targets such as Michael Jennings, Sonny Bill Williams, Luke O'Donnell and James Maloney. Some of their own product that year included SKD, RTS, Jake Friend, Mitchell Pearce and Boyd Cordner among others. But the pattern is clear. The Roosters can't develop talent. They are pretty decent at poaching talent from elsewhere at young ages such as Minichiello (Sam Walker anyone), but they can't win comps unless they steal the best players in the NRL from other teams. They are literally the only club who actually can do this and it can only be one of two ways. They either cheat the cap, or players sign for unders because of the secret society they get to join that is worth more than money because they get to drink the blood of virgins on offshore superyacht parties. Or both. It is probably definitely both.

2014 - Souths - Kind of a miracle team tbqh. You could argue they bought it... but outside of GI it was mostly developed talent coupled with the Burgess acquisitions and Ben Te'o. England players are wildcards tbh. In actuality stacking your side with English forwards is a pretty good indicator of success when you look at what players like Adrian Morley, Gareth Ellis, James Graham and the Burgii have done for sides. But they still had Keary, Reynolds and Koro in the spine who were Souths development successes.

2015 - Cowboys - I mean, looking past the fact that the 2014, 15 and 16 premierships were literally the NRL rigging them for fairytales (don't pretend you weren't there), the Cowboys had signed zero marquee players from elsewhere at all.

2016 - Sharks - A little bit like that early century Penrith side. They actually did have a few buys, but it wasn't exactly marquee talent. Ben Barba was a bit of a scrapheap signing because of off field drama, Jack Bird was a youth poaching, Jimmy Maloney wasn't really rated that highly at the time. Tbh in a sliding doors universe we could have been the premiers that year had we landed Luke Lewis, picked right between Fifita and Groat and signed James Maloney or something. Long story short, a little more bought than usual.

2017 - Storm - Same old Storm. All their singing were just incredible coups like Addo-Carr, Curtis Scott, one dimensional players they get running through walls like Dale Finucane or wily vets like Will Chambers.

2018 - Roosters - Roosters gonna Rooster. They bought Tedesco, Keary, Cronk and Fergo and they bought another premiership.

2019 - Roosters - Add Brett Morris to replace Blake Ferguson and see above.

2020.- Storm - Paps (youth coup), Vuni (talent ID), Olam (talent ID), Brenko (scrapheap), JAC (coup), Munster (talent ID), Hughes (scrapheap), Bromwich (talent ID) etc. etc. etc.

What does this all say.

Well, very very occasionally a team wins a premiership by filling out their roster with good quality first graders they sign from elsewhere. In almost all cases it gets them one premiership and is followed by a lull. This heavily indicates that the teams that do this (02 Panthers, 14 Souths, 16 Sharks) redline very hard to do so and probably also heavily backload contracts sacrificing future seasons. Which is a Roosters special. They don't do it as good as the Roosters because the Roosters have a Roosters quality about them that is some mystery and I solved it, it's actually Nick Politis is Satan. Anywho point being, the Roosters can and do buy premierships. They are the only side that seemingly can just decide to go get the best player in the NRL and then win a comp in doing so. Every other team that does anything like this ends up overpaying in doing so, ruins their squad depth and they don't succeed.

Almost every premier in the last 20 years were strategically developed squads comprised mostly of junior talent they themselves brought through, with a very small sprinkling of quality but not top signings from outside. Wildcard of English forwards winning comps.

We are not the Roosters. We don't have a secret society at our club. We cannot buy our way to a premiership. We CAN and absolutely SHOULD develop our way there. Sheens knows that and knows how to rebuild our pathways. I do hope that is exactly what he is here to do. Because that is in fact our strength. With the Centre of Excellence coming we will at least finally be able to compete on an even playing field in those terms, but that'll only bring us up to square with Parramatta and Penrith. It won't make us the Roosters. Hartigan is an actual genius. There is no point making overpaid marquee signings. If your ultimate goal is to come 4th or 5th every year I suppose you could do that. Say hello to the Parramatta Eels for the last several years. If you want sustained, continual actual performance. Just be patient, set your development pathways, get your off field right, get your coaching right and it will come. So it didn't work with the "Big 4". It doesn't matter. One misfire doesn't offset the data. The results do not lie. We do not buy our way out of this. We tried that, it was dumb. Stop complaining about recruitment woes. We are active in the market, we have our prices, we are looking for value, we are unwilling to compromise. This is a good thing. Don't let the likes of James Hooper and other fellow numpties psychologically manipulate you into adding to the beating drum that leads to nowhere.

Our 2022 Roster has good composition. It might not win a comp, but it patterns to be quite typical of the rosters of many of the teams that have won comps over the last 20 years. Except Mbye we have to get rid of him so bad, and definitely don't sign the CO for Joey Leilua. The rest is good. More of the same.

Monster post jeez. I’d take 4th or 5th every year.

You would right now because of how much it has sucked but once you get there and can't win a comp it begins to feel exactly the same or worse. Ask any Eels fan.
 
@facepalmer said in [Recruitment](/post/1422876) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Recruitment](/post/1422873) said:
@facepalmer said in [Recruitment](/post/1422852) said:
We are not an attractive club. News at 11. The reason? We're poorly run, disorganised, have a bad culture. Our best players have to scrape and beg for respect. Sometimes they leave and suddenly they're considered superstars. There are other clubs that struggle similarly for different, more permanent reasons.

North QLD - Location mostly.
Warriors - Also location unless you're a Kiwi.
Canberra - Location.

These clubs have had successful periods, none of which came from massive recruitment drives. In actuality let's look at the last 20 NRL premiership winning sides and see how many of these sides had genuine stars they threw the chequebook at.

2000 Brisbane Broncos - Almost entirely local products and very few star signings with the exception of Gorden Tallis and Luke Priddis.

2001 Newcastle Knights - A single sorta marquee signing but not really because he mostly fulfilled his potential once he got here, Ben Kennedy. The rest were Newcastle products or randoms.

2002 Sydney Roosters - Almost entirely mercenaries. A few guys they blooded that they found from the bush and Western Sydney + Bryan Fletcher and Luke Ricketson make up the rest. Names like Brett Mullins, Brad Fittler, Justin Hodges, Adrian Morley. A genuinely bought premiership.

2003 - Penrith Panthers - Surprisingly did have a few quality signings that weren't produced at Penrith including Wesser, Girdler, Campbell, Priddis plus a few other lesser lights that they signed. Smart signings though and still had a ton of developed talent.

2004 - Bulldogs - I suppose you could say they poached Andrew Ryan maybe.

2005 - Tigers - We know this one. Hobbled Scott Prince and a few other tried horses plus a bunch of Tigers produce.

2006 - Broncos - Brisbane products.

2007 - Storm* - Marquee signing Anthony Quinn?

2008 - Manly - Jamie Lyon coming off a stint in the ESL, Steven Bell and Josh Perry are the only signings at all. Could hardly call any of them marquee signings.

2009 - Storm* - Scrapheap Brett Finch the big signing.

2010 - Dragons - They bought this premiership by buying Wayne Bennett who dragged his son along with him as well as Neville Costigan. Aside from that, pretty much all development.

2011 - Manly - Pretty much no new signings since 2008 though they had developed some more talent that wasn't present in 2008 such as Foran and DCE. Impressive that they won a comp with an entirely different halves pairing a mere 3 seasons after they had already won one. Brought through a new generation of leaders without sacrificing performance. Orford and Lyon even still playing in the NRL at the time. Competence par excellence.

2012 - Storm* - The team that found it so difficult to compete with the salary cap they had to cheat even though they signed nobody because no RL players actually want to live in Melbourne (seriously they all move away the minute they retire). They had no new marquee signings. A few fringe guys they turned into quality like Waqa yeah. Widdop had come through to replace Scrapheap Finch. That's what they do, they still do it.

2013 - Roosters - Another bought premiership by the Roosters though to their credit they had developed a fair bit of talent to go along with poaching targets such as Michael Jennings, Sonny Bill Williams, Luke O'Donnell and James Maloney. Some of their own product that year included SKD, RTS, Jake Friend, Mitchell Pearce and Boyd Cordner among others. But the pattern is clear. The Roosters can't develop talent. They are pretty decent at poaching talent from elsewhere at young ages such as Minichiello (Sam Walker anyone), but they can't win comps unless they steal the best players in the NRL from other teams. They are literally the only club who actually can do this and it can only be one of two ways. They either cheat the cap, or players sign for unders because of the secret society they get to join that is worth more than money because they get to drink the blood of virgins on offshore superyacht parties. Or both. It is probably definitely both.

2014 - Souths - Kind of a miracle team tbqh. You could argue they bought it... but outside of GI it was mostly developed talent coupled with the Burgess acquisitions and Ben Te'o. England players are wildcards tbh. In actuality stacking your side with English forwards is a pretty good indicator of success when you look at what players like Adrian Morley, Gareth Ellis, James Graham and the Burgii have done for sides. But they still had Keary, Reynolds and Koro in the spine who were Souths development successes.

2015 - Cowboys - I mean, looking past the fact that the 2014, 15 and 16 premierships were literally the NRL rigging them for fairytales (don't pretend you weren't there), the Cowboys had signed zero marquee players from elsewhere at all.

2016 - Sharks - A little bit like that early century Penrith side. They actually did have a few buys, but it wasn't exactly marquee talent. Ben Barba was a bit of a scrapheap signing because of off field drama, Jack Bird was a youth poaching, Jimmy Maloney wasn't really rated that highly at the time. Tbh in a sliding doors universe we could have been the premiers that year had we landed Luke Lewis, picked right between Fifita and Groat and signed James Maloney or something. Long story short, a little more bought than usual.

2017 - Storm - Same old Storm. All their singing were just incredible coups like Addo-Carr, Curtis Scott, one dimensional players they get running through walls like Dale Finucane or wily vets like Will Chambers.

2018 - Roosters - Roosters gonna Rooster. They bought Tedesco, Keary, Cronk and Fergo and they bought another premiership.

2019 - Roosters - Add Brett Morris to replace Blake Ferguson and see above.

2020.- Storm - Paps (youth coup), Vuni (talent ID), Olam (talent ID), Brenko (scrapheap), JAC (coup), Munster (talent ID), Hughes (scrapheap), Bromwich (talent ID) etc. etc. etc.

What does this all say.

Well, very very occasionally a team wins a premiership by filling out their roster with good quality first graders they sign from elsewhere. In almost all cases it gets them one premiership and is followed by a lull. This heavily indicates that the teams that do this (02 Panthers, 14 Souths, 16 Sharks) redline very hard to do so and probably also heavily backload contracts sacrificing future seasons. Which is a Roosters special. They don't do it as good as the Roosters because the Roosters have a Roosters quality about them that is some mystery and I solved it, it's actually Nick Politis is Satan. Anywho point being, the Roosters can and do buy premierships. They are the only side that seemingly can just decide to go get the best player in the NRL and then win a comp in doing so. Every other team that does anything like this ends up overpaying in doing so, ruins their squad depth and they don't succeed.

Almost every premier in the last 20 years were strategically developed squads comprised mostly of junior talent they themselves brought through, with a very small sprinkling of quality but not top signings from outside. Wildcard of English forwards winning comps.

We are not the Roosters. We don't have a secret society at our club. We cannot buy our way to a premiership. We CAN and absolutely SHOULD develop our way there. Sheens knows that and knows how to rebuild our pathways. I do hope that is exactly what he is here to do. Because that is in fact our strength. With the Centre of Excellence coming we will at least finally be able to compete on an even playing field in those terms, but that'll only bring us up to square with Parramatta and Penrith. It won't make us the Roosters. Hartigan is an actual genius. There is no point making overpaid marquee signings. If your ultimate goal is to come 4th or 5th every year I suppose you could do that. Say hello to the Parramatta Eels for the last several years. If you want sustained, continual actual performance. Just be patient, set your development pathways, get your off field right, get your coaching right and it will come. So it didn't work with the "Big 4". It doesn't matter. One misfire doesn't offset the data. The results do not lie. We do not buy our way out of this. We tried that, it was dumb. Stop complaining about recruitment woes. We are active in the market, we have our prices, we are looking for value, we are unwilling to compromise. This is a good thing. Don't let the likes of James Hooper and other fellow numpties psychologically manipulate you into adding to the beating drum that leads to nowhere.

Our 2022 Roster has good composition. It might not win a comp, but it patterns to be quite typical of the rosters of many of the teams that have won comps over the last 20 years. Except Mbye we have to get rid of him so bad, and definitely don't sign the CO for Joey Leilua. The rest is good. More of the same.

Monster post jeez. I’d take 4th or 5th every year.

You would right now because of how much it has sucked but once you get there and can't win a comp it begins to feel exactly the same or worse. Ask any Eels fan.

You’re probably right, but we could cross that bridge when we get there.
 
@facepalmer said in [Recruitment](/post/1422868) said:
I mapped out the way I would handle recruitment strategy in a post back in April. I actually think now I'd probably even just completely ditch targeting marquees at all because our club is forced to pay premiums for any of them if we want them and we just really shouldn't do it. Maybe one day we can land marquee talent at market value but not while our club is in the shape it is.

https://weststigersforum.com/topic/32217/recruitment-strategy-for-2021-and-beyond?_=1626863349472

What’s your call on Newcastle?
Interesting how you mentioned you only go all out if you think you have a shot at the premiership.
Did they ditch their initial rebuild strategy too early. Which was through their juniors whilst recruiting quality experienced players around them.
In one year they went from signing Kurt Mann and Jacob Lillyman to signing Mitchell Pearce and David Klemmer.
Did they jump the premiership window gun too soon?
Would they been better off holding out a couple more years for some of those young players they ditched to build a better squad core and depth?

I ask because I feel like we are at that point right now where they were, ‘crying foul that even though Jack Bird promised them the world he went for a higher profile club with a perceived better outcome.’

From that moment though they hit the switch and just bought every discard.
 
@facepalmer said in [Recruitment](/post/1422875) said:
@geo said in [Recruitment](/post/1422869) said:
@pj said in [Recruitment](/post/1422857) said:
@geo said in [Recruitment](/post/1422581) said:
What makes everyone so sure that the current roster will play for a different coach...

Shouldn't they want to play for personal performance and some pride in the jersey they put on..

Sure the Dogs recruitment has been out of this world on paper as was the Knights a few year back..it's got them nowhere really..basically they went away from junior development to trying to buy success..hasn't really worked out yet..doesn't look like it's going too

It's yet to be seen if it does at the Dogs..could work..could flop massively..

Building from within does produce results if done properly.. You develop Jake Simpkin to be our Harry Grant, Stefano Utoikamanu to be our Payne Hass, Tuki Simpkins to be our Pangia Jnr and so on.. Sure that doesn't mean if quality becomes available you don't have a crack or even pay overs if they are exceptional quality Brandon Smith like..

Buying comps has never been as successful as building them..

Our club is great at finding and developing promising juniors. Unfortunately we are terrible at retaining them

Tim Sheens didn't have that issue in retaining them... We were only terrible through the Potter/Taylor/Voldamort years..

That needs to change clearly they are putting measures in place to rectify those shortfalls..

Here's an analogy.

You are the best at what you do. You win industry awards. But the company doesn't grow and you can't grow because of it. You look around you and your managers are dinosaurs or idiots with bad reputations. Suddenly GOOGLE sends you a message on LinkedIn. "We want you and will make you the highest paid employee in your entire industry".

Do you leave or stay?

How many times in the Sheens era did we hear Farah and Benji state they stayed for less than they could have got elsewhere.. yes it turned sour at the end..mainly because Sheens wanted to refresh the boys Club ..The downhill slide really began and the Wests Tigers have never recovered..

If you believe in what you are doing you stay and make your mark but that's me..
 
@geo said in [Recruitment](/post/1422881) said:
@facepalmer said in [Recruitment](/post/1422875) said:
@geo said in [Recruitment](/post/1422869) said:
@pj said in [Recruitment](/post/1422857) said:
@geo said in [Recruitment](/post/1422581) said:
What makes everyone so sure that the current roster will play for a different coach...

Shouldn't they want to play for personal performance and some pride in the jersey they put on..

Sure the Dogs recruitment has been out of this world on paper as was the Knights a few year back..it's got them nowhere really..basically they went away from junior development to trying to buy success..hasn't really worked out yet..doesn't look like it's going too

It's yet to be seen if it does at the Dogs..could work..could flop massively..

Building from within does produce results if done properly.. You develop Jake Simpkin to be our Harry Grant, Stefano Utoikamanu to be our Payne Hass, Tuki Simpkins to be our Pangia Jnr and so on.. Sure that doesn't mean if quality becomes available you don't have a crack or even pay overs if they are exceptional quality Brandon Smith like..

Buying comps has never been as successful as building them..

Our club is great at finding and developing promising juniors. Unfortunately we are terrible at retaining them

Tim Sheens didn't have that issue in retaining them... We were only terrible through the Potter/Taylor/Voldamort years..

That needs to change clearly they are putting measures in place to rectify those shortfalls..

Here's an analogy.

You are the best at what you do. You win industry awards. But the company doesn't grow and you can't grow because of it. You look around you and your managers are dinosaurs or idiots with bad reputations. Suddenly GOOGLE sends you a message on LinkedIn. "We want you and will make you the highest paid employee in your entire industry".

Do you leave or stay?

How many times in the Sheens era did we hear Farah and Benji state they stayed for less than they could have got elsewhere.. yes it turned sour at the end..mainly because Sheens wanted to refresh the boys Club ..The downhill slide really began and the Wests Tigers have never recovered..

If you believe in what you are doing you stay and make your mark but that's me..

Wait wait wait. Why was it though afterwards the clubs salary cap take a hit from all their back ended payments.

Maybe ‘they’ll take less’ was in terms of right now with the promise of being caught up in the future.
 
@cairnstigers said in [Recruitment](/post/1422632) said:
@weststigers said in [Recruitment](/post/1422439) said:
@cairnstigers said in [Recruitment](/post/1422349) said:
Is it possible that the dogs haven't announced him yet because they can't get him under their cap
Are they waiting to move someone on 1st
Anyway if reports are true then we should move on and forget about TPJ
I don't know why we hang on so long for an answer
Either a player accepts our offer or he doesn't
It should not be used as a bargain chip
I just bought a unit with an offer on the table for 24 hours
I didn't give them time to have an open home so others could make an offer
It was a take it or leave it approach
It's worked for me twice now as I learnt the 1st time not to get played and used as leverage
Our initial offer to Pangai was probably the best offer at the time, but giving him all this time to field better offers works against you
Put your best offer in the 1st time and give minimal time to accept
If it's not good enough then move on the the next

We should not have gone back for a second bite

I would go after Vaughan now in the fashion I spoke about above
Ask his manager what would secure his signature today/Tomorrow
If we agree get the deal done
If not then walk away and let him take his chances elsewhere

Nrl contracts are like an auction now
Usually goes to the highest bidder but also comes back to the terms

Maybe the club should have gone to $750'000 per year on a 3 year deal
But the 2nd and 3rd year in the clubs option
If he performs we take it up
If not the see ya later
Bit like Bj

I suppose if you're going to use that tactic, you've got to be prepared to walk after 24 hours as well.

I'd also imagine that tactic attracts sellers that are desperate for a buyer.

I don't think TPJ was desperate and I don't think we were willing to walk given there arent that many players around in the market of TPJ's stature.

I doubt this tactic would work if attempting to buy a highly sought after property.

In property sometimes the 1st offer is the best offer
Sure we take a risk
But so does the player in ?

Eh sometimes...I've been in real estate and seen that type of thing. Rarely works and if it does it works better in regional areas with less buyers.

Back to league...most agents are going to want to collate the offers and present options to their client. It's more than a money transaction in league, unlike your property scenario.

Players are weighing up money, facilities, location, ability to play finals, the coach etc.

A club needs to sell the benefits of a player being at that club...there are intangible benefits at certain clubs, so 24 hours is hardly enough time to assess one clubs offer against another.

Imagine if you were looking on SEEK for a new job and you got a call from a recruiter that said, "you've got the job! but it's off the table in 24 hours"

If you're desperate, you'd probably take it, however if you know you have value in the market, you'd likely give it the flick knowing you could get similar or better elsewhere.

Clubs with 24 hour offers are likely to be out of the market for that player 24 hours later.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Recruitment](/post/1422728) said:
@kiwitiger said in [Recruitment](/post/1422724) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Recruitment](/post/1422716) said:
@jc99 said in [Recruitment](/post/1422662) said:
@aturkey said in [Recruitment](/post/1422659) said:
@garryowen said in [Recruitment](/post/1422635) said:
The recruitment has been a bit of a shambles for almost the whole existence of the club tbh. We had a couple of good crops that wielded results, but even then we've only had three finals series (albeit we won a comp and could/should have won another).

Since 2011 the club has gone from panic move to panic move, resulting in lots of failed short term moves. Who can forget old mate Grant Mayer speculating that we'd make a GF in the mid 2010s?

I am a bit more confident in the club's direction over the last year or two. We've made some shrewd buys for the first time in a while, and some very promising youngsters on top of that. There have still been mis-steps (e.g. BJ) but I can at least see what we're building towards now. Hopefully we continue along that route in picking up these young guys and developing them into frontline FGers.

Of course, we'll still need to recruit elite players on top of that. The COE should help - I can't imagine the current/past facilities have sold the club very well.
But it's the old conundrum: you can't sign elite players until you have an elite team. And you can't have an elite team until you have elite players.

There is so much denial in this forum. This comment is a great example.

How have the Bulldogs signed Addo Carr, Tevita, and Burton then?

They do not have an elite team. What about the Titans signing Tino and Fifita? Did they have an elite team?

There are more factors at play here. Our location, our lack of success (3 finals in 21 years), our inability to locate and keep talent, our disregard of campbelltown, a lack of identity etc etc etc

If I was an NRL player right now, with my love of the Tigers, and had an option of the Tigers or any one else, I would not go to this club.

Tigers are the last Sydney club you'd choose. No home ground, no identity, it's not prime area to live, there's really nothing much there to attract people off the field let alone our decade of failure and drama. This is why we need to win games and make finals because we are behind other clubs in those other areas.

The inner west is a highly desirable area in which to live. Balmain, Glebe, Leichhardt, Ashfield and Strathfield just to name a few good suburbs.

But you don't have to live where you play, not since the 70's so it doesn't matter?

There are those who live in Balmain and those who wish they could.

Used to be true. I loved Balmain growing up, envied the Wayne Pearce story more than anything. But I walk around now and don't really like the place. I was there last week and I thought how I was sort of glad we merged with wests because at least we're geographically connected to a community I'm proud the club represents. That's not Balmain anymore. Beautiful by the water and all, but the bankers and lawyers and marketing people are turning the suburb into double bay with their spiffy renovations and audis. Place has lost its character.
 
@moh said in [Recruitment](/post/1422316) said:
@tigerwest said in [Recruitment](/post/1422303) said:
@iwasright said in [Recruitment](/post/1422299) said:
This is how bad we are going with recruitment. I can tell you TPJ’S manager is very very close with a high Wests Tigers member and we still couldn’t get the signing done. This has officially confirmed that we are really struggling to bring high profile players to the club

All I'm seeing is that he took the higher price, I don't blame him?

Weren't we the higher price.....

The Tigers offer was larger but included the rest of this season so the disparity is not that large
 
@needaname said in [Recruitment](/post/1422882) said:
@geo said in [Recruitment](/post/1422881) said:
@facepalmer said in [Recruitment](/post/1422875) said:
@geo said in [Recruitment](/post/1422869) said:
@pj said in [Recruitment](/post/1422857) said:
@geo said in [Recruitment](/post/1422581) said:
What makes everyone so sure that the current roster will play for a different coach...

Shouldn't they want to play for personal performance and some pride in the jersey they put on..

Sure the Dogs recruitment has been out of this world on paper as was the Knights a few year back..it's got them nowhere really..basically they went away from junior development to trying to buy success..hasn't really worked out yet..doesn't look like it's going too

It's yet to be seen if it does at the Dogs..could work..could flop massively..

Building from within does produce results if done properly.. You develop Jake Simpkin to be our Harry Grant, Stefano Utoikamanu to be our Payne Hass, Tuki Simpkins to be our Pangia Jnr and so on.. Sure that doesn't mean if quality becomes available you don't have a crack or even pay overs if they are exceptional quality Brandon Smith like..

Buying comps has never been as successful as building them..

Our club is great at finding and developing promising juniors. Unfortunately we are terrible at retaining them

Tim Sheens didn't have that issue in retaining them... We were only terrible through the Potter/Taylor/Voldamort years..

That needs to change clearly they are putting measures in place to rectify those shortfalls..

Here's an analogy.

You are the best at what you do. You win industry awards. But the company doesn't grow and you can't grow because of it. You look around you and your managers are dinosaurs or idiots with bad reputations. Suddenly GOOGLE sends you a message on LinkedIn. "We want you and will make you the highest paid employee in your entire industry".

Do you leave or stay?

How many times in the Sheens era did we hear Farah and Benji state they stayed for less than they could have got elsewhere.. yes it turned sour at the end..mainly because Sheens wanted to refresh the boys Club ..The downhill slide really began and the Wests Tigers have never recovered..

If you believe in what you are doing you stay and make your mark but that's me..

Wait wait wait. Why was it though afterwards the clubs salary cap take a hit from all their back ended payments.

Maybe ‘they’ll take less’ was in terms of right now with the promise of being caught up in the future.

The back ended deals wasn’t under Sheens.
 
@jc99 said in [Recruitment](/post/1422733) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Recruitment](/post/1422716) said:
@jc99 said in [Recruitment](/post/1422662) said:
@aturkey said in [Recruitment](/post/1422659) said:
@garryowen said in [Recruitment](/post/1422635) said:
The recruitment has been a bit of a shambles for almost the whole existence of the club tbh. We had a couple of good crops that wielded results, but even then we've only had three finals series (albeit we won a comp and could/should have won another).

Since 2011 the club has gone from panic move to panic move, resulting in lots of failed short term moves. Who can forget old mate Grant Mayer speculating that we'd make a GF in the mid 2010s?

I am a bit more confident in the club's direction over the last year or two. We've made some shrewd buys for the first time in a while, and some very promising youngsters on top of that. There have still been mis-steps (e.g. BJ) but I can at least see what we're building towards now. Hopefully we continue along that route in picking up these young guys and developing them into frontline FGers.

Of course, we'll still need to recruit elite players on top of that. The COE should help - I can't imagine the current/past facilities have sold the club very well.
But it's the old conundrum: you can't sign elite players until you have an elite team. And you can't have an elite team until you have elite players.

There is so much denial in this forum. This comment is a great example.

How have the Bulldogs signed Addo Carr, Tevita, and Burton then?

They do not have an elite team. What about the Titans signing Tino and Fifita? Did they have an elite team?

There are more factors at play here. Our location, our lack of success (3 finals in 21 years), our inability to locate and keep talent, our disregard of campbelltown, a lack of identity etc etc etc

If I was an NRL player right now, with my love of the Tigers, and had an option of the Tigers or any one else, I would not go to this club.

Tigers are the last Sydney club you'd choose. No home ground, no identity, it's not prime area to live, there's really nothing much there to attract people off the field let alone our decade of failure and drama. This is why we need to win games and make finals because we are behind other clubs in those other areas.

The inner west is a highly desirable area in which to live. Balmain, Glebe, Leichhardt, Ashfield and Strathfield just to name a few good suburbs.

Guess it's all personal opinion. I could see footy players being swayed by the beaches and nightlife of other areas in Sydney

Imagine doing a nice media commitment in Balmain, then being trucked off to Campbelltown for a fan day...yuck.

No offence to the Westies on the forum, but Campbo doesn't have the same appeal as Balmain.
 
@celtic_tiger said in [Recruitment](/post/1422345) said:
Our valuations are not realistic. It’s all very noble saying we won’t pay overs but any player is worth what a given club is willing to pay him.

You've only just glanced off the depth of this possibility.

Firstly, no, any player is not worth what a given club is willing to pay him. Ben Hunt is not worth a reported million bucks, neither is Milford.

But to the valuations - it may be possible that our valuations are realistic, but we are simply in a dangerous market against more desperate or reckless clubs.

It's like the Sydney housing market - I don't think anyone thinks house prices in Sydney are good value, but go to any auction and there are a hundred idiots throwing money at property.

Now maybe you just need to join the idiots and throw cash at the problem, or maybe you stick to your budget and play the long game. I would argue that Tigers have already had significant experience throwing cash at roster issues, and it has worked out badly. They are choosing a different approach under the restrictions of a salary cap.

Because if we are talking high-profile targets, it distills to a pretty clear scenario - we have only lost out to Bulldogs and Souths recently? If Tigers were interested in Latrell, JAC, Jai Arrow and TPJ, they either went to Wayne Bennett, or huge cash offers from the Bulldogs.

I personally don't think it's wise to try and compete with Bulldogs, because they truly appear to be bringing out the chequebook for any notable player on the market, and applying very blunt strokes to address their own problems. Have Bulldogs signed a decent half to pair with Burton? No. Have they signed a decent hooker? No. Have they ironed out their preferred fullback? No. Have they got any decent juniors? I haven't really seen them, maybe this Biondi fellow, and Averillo is worth persisting with.

Have any of the Bulldogs 2019-2021 signings come good? No not really; actually it's been a bit of a horror show - Meaney, Allan, Napa, Flanagan, Britt, Stimson, Jesse Sue, Christian Crichton, Jack Cogger, DWZ, Foran, Hetherington, Tim Lafai, Cotric, Corey Waddell, Sione Katoa. All average to terrible signings. Pass mark maybe for Luke Thompson.
 
@facepalmer said in [Recruitment](/post/1422852) said:
2013 - Roosters - Another bought premiership by the Roosters though to their credit they had developed a fair bit of talent to go along with poaching targets such as Michael Jennings, Sonny Bill Williams, Luke O'Donnell and James Maloney. Some of their own product that year included SKD, RTS, Jake Friend, Mitchell Pearce and Boyd Cordner among others. But the pattern is clear. The Roosters can't develop talent. They are pretty decent at poaching talent from elsewhere at young ages such as Minichiello (Sam Walker anyone), but they can't win comps unless they steal the best players in the NRL from other teams. They are literally the only club who actually can do this and it can only be one of two ways. They either cheat the cap, or players sign for unders because of the secret society they get to join that is worth more than money because they get to drink the blood of virgins on offshore superyacht parties. Or both. It is probably definitely both.

2018 - Roosters - Roosters gonna Rooster. They bought Tedesco, Keary, Cronk and Fergo and they bought another premiership.

2019 - Roosters - Add Brett Morris to replace Blake Ferguson and see above.

What does this all say.

**Nick Politis is Satan**.

You should be careful what you write on the internet. You are a valued member of the forum. This post may be your undoing.
 
@kazoo-kid said in [Recruitment](/post/1422923) said:
@facepalmer said in [Recruitment](/post/1422852) said:
2013 - Roosters - Another bought premiership by the Roosters though to their credit they had developed a fair bit of talent to go along with poaching targets such as Michael Jennings, Sonny Bill Williams, Luke O'Donnell and James Maloney. Some of their own product that year included SKD, RTS, Jake Friend, Mitchell Pearce and Boyd Cordner among others. But the pattern is clear. The Roosters can't develop talent. They are pretty decent at poaching talent from elsewhere at young ages such as Minichiello (Sam Walker anyone), but they can't win comps unless they steal the best players in the NRL from other teams. They are literally the only club who actually can do this and it can only be one of two ways. They either cheat the cap, or players sign for unders because of the secret society they get to join that is worth more than money because they get to drink the blood of virgins on offshore superyacht parties. Or both. It is probably definitely both.

2018 - Roosters - Roosters gonna Rooster. They bought Tedesco, Keary, Cronk and Fergo and they bought another premiership.

2019 - Roosters - Add Brett Morris to replace Blake Ferguson and see above.

What does this all say.

**Nick Politis is Satan**.

You should be careful what you write on the internet. You are a valued member of the forum. This post may be your undoing.

He meant Santa.
 
@tilllindemann said in [Recruitment](/post/1422456) said:
@weststigerman said in [Recruitment](/post/1422449) said:
@iwasright said in [Recruitment](/post/1422299) said:
This is how bad we are going with recruitment. I can tell you TPJ’S manager is very very close with a high Wests Tigers member and we still couldn’t get the signing done. This has officially confirmed that we are really struggling to bring high profile players to the club

Didn't you create a thread a couple of weeks ago saying we're good hands? This one: https://weststigersforum.com/topic/32648/good-hands?_=1626840374908

Do you have split personalities?

I actually thought Imback and Iwasright were the same person, but I see them arguing with each other today.

Where is Alien when you need a good three-way conversation between one people.
 
@geo said in [Recruitment](/post/1422581) said:
Sure the Dogs recruitment has been out of this world on paper as was the Knights a few year back…it’s got them nowhere really…basically they went away from junior development to trying to buy success…hasn’t really worked out yet…doesn’t look like it’s going too

Titans also. Warriors had some huge signing coups.
 
@jirskyr said in [Recruitment](/post/1422919) said:
@celtic_tiger said in [Recruitment](/post/1422345) said:
Our valuations are not realistic. It’s all very noble saying we won’t pay overs but any player is worth what a given club is willing to pay him.

You've only just glanced off the depth of this possibility.

Firstly, no, any player is not worth what a given club is willing to pay him. Ben Hunt is not worth a reported million bucks, neither is Milford.

But to the valuations - it may be possible that our valuations are realistic, but we are simply in a dangerous market against more desperate or reckless clubs.

It's like the Sydney housing market - I don't think anyone thinks house prices in Sydney are good value, but go to any auction and there are a hundred idiots throwing money at property.

Now maybe you just need to join the idiots and throw cash at the problem, or maybe you stick to your budget and play the long game. I would argue that Tigers have already had significant experience throwing cash at roster issues, and it has worked out badly. They are choosing a different approach under the restrictions of a salary cap.

Because if we are talking high-profile targets, it distills to a pretty clear scenario - we have only lost out to Bulldogs and Souths recently? If Tigers were interested in Latrell, JAC, Jai Arrow and TPJ, they either went to Wayne Bennett, or huge cash offers from the Bulldogs.

I personally don't think it's wise to try and compete with Bulldogs, because they truly appear to be bringing out the chequebook for any notable player on the market, and applying very blunt strokes to address their own problems. Have Bulldogs signed a decent half to pair with Burton? No. Have they signed a decent hooker? No. Have they ironed out their preferred fullback? No. Have they got any decent juniors? I haven't really seen them, maybe this Biondi fellow, and Averillo is worth persisting with.

Have any of the Bulldogs 2019-2021 signings come good? No not really; actually it's been a bit of a horror show - Meaney, Allan, Napa, Flanagan, Britt, Stimson, Jesse Sue, Christian Crichton, Jack Cogger, DWZ, Foran, Hetherington, Tim Lafai, Cotric, Corey Waddell, Sione Katoa. All average to terrible signings. Pass mark maybe for Luke Thompson.

Actually any player is worth what a given club is willing to pay him. West Tigers might think tpj is worth 600k per year but he is actually worth 2.2 over three years that is what the dogs have paid for him
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Recruitment](/post/1422932) said:
@jirskyr said in [Recruitment](/post/1422919) said:
@celtic_tiger said in [Recruitment](/post/1422345) said:
Our valuations are not realistic. It’s all very noble saying we won’t pay overs but any player is worth what a given club is willing to pay him.

You've only just glanced off the depth of this possibility.

Firstly, no, any player is not worth what a given club is willing to pay him. Ben Hunt is not worth a reported million bucks, neither is Milford.

But to the valuations - it may be possible that our valuations are realistic, but we are simply in a dangerous market against more desperate or reckless clubs.

It's like the Sydney housing market - I don't think anyone thinks house prices in Sydney are good value, but go to any auction and there are a hundred idiots throwing money at property.

Now maybe you just need to join the idiots and throw cash at the problem, or maybe you stick to your budget and play the long game. I would argue that Tigers have already had significant experience throwing cash at roster issues, and it has worked out badly. They are choosing a different approach under the restrictions of a salary cap.

Because if we are talking high-profile targets, it distills to a pretty clear scenario - we have only lost out to Bulldogs and Souths recently? If Tigers were interested in Latrell, JAC, Jai Arrow and TPJ, they either went to Wayne Bennett, or huge cash offers from the Bulldogs.

I personally don't think it's wise to try and compete with Bulldogs, because they truly appear to be bringing out the chequebook for any notable player on the market, and applying very blunt strokes to address their own problems. Have Bulldogs signed a decent half to pair with Burton? No. Have they signed a decent hooker? No. Have they ironed out their preferred fullback? No. Have they got any decent juniors? I haven't really seen them, maybe this Biondi fellow, and Averillo is worth persisting with.

Have any of the Bulldogs 2019-2021 signings come good? No not really; actually it's been a bit of a horror show - Meaney, Allan, Napa, Flanagan, Britt, Stimson, Jesse Sue, Christian Crichton, Jack Cogger, DWZ, Foran, Hetherington, Tim Lafai, Cotric, Corey Waddell, Sione Katoa. All average to terrible signings. Pass mark maybe for Luke Thompson.

Actually any player is worth what a given club is willing to pay him. West Tigers might think tpj is worth 600k per year but he is actually worth 2.2 over three years that is what the dogs have paid for him

So Mbye is worth $850k
 
@cochise said in [Recruitment](/post/1422933) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Recruitment](/post/1422932) said:
@jirskyr said in [Recruitment](/post/1422919) said:
@celtic_tiger said in [Recruitment](/post/1422345) said:
Our valuations are not realistic. It’s all very noble saying we won’t pay overs but any player is worth what a given club is willing to pay him.

You've only just glanced off the depth of this possibility.

Firstly, no, any player is not worth what a given club is willing to pay him. Ben Hunt is not worth a reported million bucks, neither is Milford.

But to the valuations - it may be possible that our valuations are realistic, but we are simply in a dangerous market against more desperate or reckless clubs.

It's like the Sydney housing market - I don't think anyone thinks house prices in Sydney are good value, but go to any auction and there are a hundred idiots throwing money at property.

Now maybe you just need to join the idiots and throw cash at the problem, or maybe you stick to your budget and play the long game. I would argue that Tigers have already had significant experience throwing cash at roster issues, and it has worked out badly. They are choosing a different approach under the restrictions of a salary cap.

Because if we are talking high-profile targets, it distills to a pretty clear scenario - we have only lost out to Bulldogs and Souths recently? If Tigers were interested in Latrell, JAC, Jai Arrow and TPJ, they either went to Wayne Bennett, or huge cash offers from the Bulldogs.

I personally don't think it's wise to try and compete with Bulldogs, because they truly appear to be bringing out the chequebook for any notable player on the market, and applying very blunt strokes to address their own problems. Have Bulldogs signed a decent half to pair with Burton? No. Have they signed a decent hooker? No. Have they ironed out their preferred fullback? No. Have they got any decent juniors? I haven't really seen them, maybe this Biondi fellow, and Averillo is worth persisting with.

Have any of the Bulldogs 2019-2021 signings come good? No not really; actually it's been a bit of a horror show - Meaney, Allan, Napa, Flanagan, Britt, Stimson, Jesse Sue, Christian Crichton, Jack Cogger, DWZ, Foran, Hetherington, Tim Lafai, Cotric, Corey Waddell, Sione Katoa. All average to terrible signings. Pass mark maybe for Luke Thompson.

Actually any player is worth what a given club is willing to pay him. West Tigers might think tpj is worth 600k per year but he is actually worth 2.2 over three years that is what the dogs have paid for him

So Mbye is worth $850k

that is what we paid for him
 
Back
Top