Red Hot!!!

innsaneink

Moderator
Forum Leader
Mini gets off!
\
\
\
\
"Of course he gets off"

![](http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2007/02/11/va1237233526408/Politis-5385013.jpg)
 
ROOSTERS favourite Anthony Minichiello has tonight been found not guilty at the NRL judiciary and cleared to play his 250th NRL game against the Wests Tigers on Sunday.
Minichiello was sent off last Saturday when he collected Canberra fullback opposite Josh Dugan around the head.

Rather than accept a two-week ban for striking, Minichiello rolled the dice at Rugby League Central and won.

The judiciary victory is a rare piece of good news for the Chooks who weren't that long ago a huge chance for the wooden spoon. They will be banking on a big crowd for `Mini' at Allians Stadium against the Tigers.

The striking charge required Minichiello to have intent or be reckless, two things he convinced the panel members of Mal Cochrane, Michael Buettner and Don McKinnon he never set out to do. I read this article from a league app on my iPhone. I can understand that they couldn't prove intent but surely he should of been done for being reckless, he jumped up at Dugan twice. Disgraceful decision to let him off IMO.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
I think Rhino's 200th will be bigger than Mini's 250th that's been granted under controversial ground
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
WE thought the obstruction rule was hard to understand.
The NRL's three-man judiciary panel on Wednesday night made referees boss Bill Harrigan look like Captain Common Sense when it sensationally cleared Anthony Minichiello of striking Raider Josh Dugan.

Minichiello was sent off for the first time in his illustrious 13-year career on Saturday night when he leapt high off the ground twice and collected Dugan in the head the second time. Dugan required stitches to a head cut.

But with the chance to bring up his 250th game on Sunday against the Wests Tigers, Minichiello risked a three-week ban to fight the striking charge.

And judiciary panel members Don McKinnon, Mal Cochrane and Michael Buettner took 20 minutes to free former international Minichiello after he argued the tackle was "careless and clumsy, but not reckless".

To satisfy a striking charge, the NRL needed to prove Minichiello intended to hurt Dugan, or was reckless in his actions.

One insider said the NRL had got the charge wrong in the first place because a dangerous contact charge would have been more suitable given it required Minichiello to be only careless.

Minichiello, 32, said he contacted Dugan the day after the Roosters' 24-20 loss to say he was trying to wrap up the ball both times.

When he went in for the second tackle, he braced himself and anticipated a collision, only for his left arm to slam into Dugan's face.

Minichiello told the panel: "I have played this game a long time now. I've never been sent-off. It's my first time here (at the judiciary), I'm a fair player and don't go out to hurt somebody intentionally. I truly believe this wasn't striking, and just careless and clumsy on my behalf."

NRL counsel Peter Kite said there was no need for Minichiello to leap so high off the ground, and the hang time made it inevitable he would come into contact with Dugan."You jump high in the air, your arm is across your body, so the contact is inevitable, isn't it?" Kite asked Minichiello.

Most league fans will wonder how Minichiello got off but he can not be blamed for wanting to roll the dice, especially given his clean record.

Roosters fans will be delighted, as will officials who have spent weeks preparing for Mini's milestone bash.

"It's a fantastic outcome for myself," said Minichiello, who was represented by lawyer James McLeod. "I'm really happy with the hearing.

"The system gives you the opportunity to plead your case, and we did that tonight.

"It will be nice to finish with two wins. It's a big day for the club on Sunday. We've always had really good clashes against the Tigers, and we're looking forward to another."I contacted 'Duges' the next day. We had a good chat, and he was fine. He said there was no intent there. Here's another article by the same journo I posted earlier.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
They slapped him with a charge that was never going to stick, could never have been proven. That's what makes me suspicious .
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
The NRL says they get serious about protecting the head, and then the judiciary subsequently lets Minichello off under the pretense that he's a "good bloke?" If it weren't his 250th game this weekend, I'd have been curious to see what the outcome would have been.
 
and if the wrong charge was applied by the panel why can;t the judiciary just say 'no, that's wrong' but this is the right charge and we're going to apply that one.
Here's 2 weeks for a careless grade 3 (or whatever they decide)
As far as I can see, if the wrong charge is put in then he gets off scot free!
It's like saying well, you were charged with murder but actually we only think it was manslaughter. So you're free to go.
 
@softlaw said:
and if the wrong charge was applied by the panel why can;t the judiciary just say 'no, that's wrong' but this is the right charge and we're going to apply that one.
Here's 2 weeks for a careless grade 3 (or whatever they decide)
As far as I can see, if the wrong charge is put in then he gets off scot free!
It's like saying well, you were charged with murder but actually we only think it was manslaughter. So you're free to go.

More like getting charged with burglary and assault instead of rape
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
Joke of a decision - but I must admit that I think Mini is well and truly past it. He is more a liability for a Roosters these days than a match winner.

I would have been much more nervous if one of their much stronger, younger and more enthusiastic youngsters got the call up to replace him.
 
The officials are probably thinking - we are already in a big mess from all the mistakes we have made, why not make a couple more, especially because Mini is like the 'poster boy' of do gooders in the NRL. We can't have other sports officials and any outsiders looking in ready to criticize the sport of having too much reckless plays that are damaging the sport.

Unfortunately though they are damaging the sport by making these terrible decisions
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
@softlaw said:
and if the wrong charge was applied by the panel why can;t the judiciary just say 'no, that's wrong' but this is the right charge and we're going to apply that one.
Here's 2 weeks for a careless grade 3 (or whatever they decide)
As far as I can see, if the wrong charge is put in then he gets off scot free!
It's like saying well, you were charged with murder but actually we only think it was manslaughter. So you're free to go.

Exactly right.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
The NRL says they get serious about protecting the head, and then the judiciary subsequently lets Minichello off under the pretense that he's a "good blokelm?" If it weren't his 250th game this weekend, I'd have been curious to see what the outcome would have been.

I'd be interested to see if it was a player like Greg Bird or Mic Ennis
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
Back
Top