Laurie
Nofoaluma
B Leilua
Roberts
Talau
Mbye
Brooks
Tamou
Liddle
Twal
Tuilagi
L Lailua
Ofahengaue
Mikalele
Utoikamanu
Simpkins
Seyfarth
Can w3 confirm its Jake simpkins or tuki simpkins on bench
I would have Jake Simpkin on the bench after re;watching the trial, I would be close to having Simpkins as well.
Simpkin and Tuki should be on the bench. Seyfarth drops out. Garner will be starting I'd say, Tuilagi and Tuki may battle it out for a bench spot. Back coverage is a worry though, but hopefully that doesn't matter 1st game
Jake Simpkin looked better than Liddle think the 9 is still open for performance on next week trial
He was definitely better at hogging the ball and running on the fifth tackle, I'll give you that.
Haha oh dear
Look I don’t think a reserve grade trial is going to have a lot of team structure going, it’s more than likely madge told them to treat it as a game of back yard footy because I did not see a clear game plan out there
What was clear to me was he was a level above the opposition & he’s only 19 years old
@speed2burn said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1306344) said:
@russell said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1306337) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1306198) said:
@the_third said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1306195) said:
@cochise said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1306178) said:
@thedaboss said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1306173) said:
@inbenjiwetrust said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1306164) said:
Laurie
Nofoaluma
B Leilua
Roberts
Talau
Mbye
Brooks
Tamou
Liddle
Twal
Tuilagi
L Lailua
Ofahengaue
Mikalele
Utoikamanu
Simpkins
Seyfarth
Can w3 confirm its Jake simpkins or tuki simpkins on bench
I would have Jake Simpkin on the bench after re;watching the trial, I would be close to having Simpkins as well.
Simpkin and Tuki should be on the bench. Seyfarth drops out. Garner will be starting I'd say, Tuilagi and Tuki may battle it out for a bench spot. Back coverage is a worry though, but hopefully that doesn't matter 1st game
Jake Simpkin looked better than Liddle think the 9 is still open for performance on next week trial
He was definitely better at hogging the ball and running on the fifth tackle, I'll give you that.
Haha oh dear
Look I don’t think a reserve grade trial is going to have a lot of team structure going, it’s more than likely madge told them to treat it as a game of back yard footy because I did not see a clear game plan out there
What was clear to me was he was a level above the opposition & he’s only 19 years old
It was clear to me that there was more structure and a semblance of a game plan when Liddle came on.
May have just been a coincidence say the Simpkin barrel pushers. Lol
In a reserve grade trial I doubt that’s to be expected. Majority of the players in that game had barely even trained together yet alone played a single game together, case in point Laurie
Why is it bad if Simpkin plays well anyway?
Don't get why people have to make it liddle vs Simpkin. They both play for us and both played well in the trial game, can't we just be happy they did well without comparing them and making crap up about how good/bad they played? ? keen to see how they go this week
I thought a Forum (by definition) was a great place to promote discussion on various topics. I would have thought that comparing Liddle with Simpkin (especially as they both play the same position) would have been a reasonable subject for discussion. I have spent many weeks reading on here how Simpkin was the next Messiah or at the very least the new Harry Grant without even having played a single NRL game. I have read how he will be the starting Hooker and Liddle will be on the bench. I have read if we buy Branden Smith or player 'X' and we have Simpkin it will be "see ya" Liddle. I have read how fit and solid Simpkin is and how injury prone Liddle is. I have read that maybe his contract won't be renewed, that he will go to "The Dogs" or we could swap him for various players we may need.
Many of these thoughts have been expressed by you jc99 and now you ask "why people have to make it Liddle vs Simpkin?"
Would have thought the answer was obvious.