AmericanHistoryX
Well-known member
Absolutely. Our team is on life support. Show some respect brother.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But Droppy has a point. A view. Should be respected cause of its validity No nonsenseUmm this is literally THE live and post-match thread.
There is a stats man on this forum. I will ask him whoever he is becuase i cant remember to see if we have ever won a game with Jaradd Sutton with the whistle in hand. He shut us out in ths 1st half, we made mistakes yes but when we got a roll on he put the pea away. He should have given us atleast 5 or 6 repeat sets and 3 penaltys to us. Who ever you are stat man please check. Thankyou
They said someth8ing like "oh great effort to catch that...or wait, did he? Hang on!" But the play moved on and they didn't mention it again.I was at the pub and the sound wasn’t great. The last kick to Drinky - it looked like he used the ground to catch it so was knock on. Was this what the commentators said or he regained it?
The commentators have public liability for such incidents as you mention.They said someth8ing like "oh great effort to catch that...or wait, did he? Hang on!" But the play moved on and they didn't mention it again.
If there was a review I am pretty sure they would have called knock-on because I agree he used the ground to gain final control.
agree . It’s what the rule was brought in for ….
I agreed with the Nanai try call. The Cowboys player had his eyes on the ball the whole time - you have to maintain the chance for the attack to compete on bombs too imo.Agree with me or not but I had no issue with Luai and Douhei going to the bin. If they were playing for the opposition we would have been calling for there heads. The only one I did disagree with was the Nandi try. Thought whoever was underneath impacted Turuvas ability to compete for the ball.
Could've gone either way. Think maybe the guy who played the situation smarter got the outcome.He could of been penalised for tackling the guy in the air. Protecting his body. The ref unfortunately will judge that. The wanna be cop .
Don't rub it in brother. We all hurting a little on this fine Monday day. You mean the ref? It wasn't me and you. I'm sure of that.Could've gone either way. Think maybe the guy who played the situation smarter got the outcome.
Yes you were right then as you are now.Ive got be honest, I didn't see the whole game, but this is why quite a few on here were very concerned in Round 1 V Knights. There were plenty on here that were happy with the scramble defence despit 50 odd missed tackles. I said it then and I'll say it now again, it is not sustainable to scramble all game. As you say the first contact needs to be far better.
First contact, dominate the tackle, get your defence set. Why has that always been such a problem for this club??? It feels like our goal line defence is better this year, but it's the roll on up the field that puts us on the back foot all the time and it does my head in.
So - who do we talk too? That's the thing.Yes you were right then as you are now.
The same people who have been sulking about the refs for the past umpteen pages are the same ones who piled on to anyone who said the defence was atrocious in that rd1 game.
It hasn’t been fixed. It isn’t even improving. It’s just that individuals are at times performing well.
As a group, a team…it’s up to shit still.
Doueihi knew exactly what he was doing. I noticed it live and immediately said you idiot. It was blatant.Yeah the point is they are saying becuse laybutt was Looking for the ball he is not responsible for his actions .. so was douhri and he was held responsible..
Everyone.So - who do we talk too? That's the thing.
Nope. They were in the moment.I think most good judges are basing their opinions on what Galvin will be, not what he is now.
You talking to a cult. West's Tigers is their life. Their last hope in this miserable world. It's not like they be asking for too much. Any thing else?Everyone.
Cease the happy clapping and demand better.
It looked good but it wasn’t so impressive that it would rip most teams defences apart.What's so frustrating is the way we played the last 15 mins we would have towelled up virtually every team in the comp
If we could produce that for say 60 out of the 80 mins we would win most games .The 2 sin bins didn't help but it seems we have to be down by plenty to flick the switch and turn on the razzle dazzle !
Lucky we not struggling. Scored 20 points in 10 minutes. But at this stage i prefer the bottom 4 defence if it means 2 points. Depends on your version of struggling I guess. The Penrith version, Brisbane version or our version.It looked good but it wasn’t so impressive that it would rip most teams defences apart.
Cowboys have a bottom 4 defence, had 4 blokes backing up from Origin and also clocked off far too early.
Let’s see what they can do against Penrith who are also really struggling with their defence this year.
They’re all struggling. The game have largely been crap this year.Lucky we not struggling. And I'm happy with the bottom 4 defence if it means 2 points. Depends on your version of struggling I guess. The Penrith version, Brisbane version or our version.