Round 21 discussion *Spoilers

Wow only thing worse than this game is Corey parkers inability to comment on anything apart from broncos. He’s a total goose as a commentator
 
@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1044825) said:
Wow only thing worse than this game is Corey parkers inability to comment on anything apart from broncos. He’s a total goose as a commentator


Buderus says hi !
 
@hobbo1 said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1044826) said:
@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1044825) said:
Wow only thing worse than this game is Corey parkers inability to comment on anything apart from broncos. He’s a total goose as a commentator


Buderus says hi !


Yep agreed
 
Seibold has bought a lemon.

Stuck with Milford and Darius, and all those supposedly gun forwards are flat track bullies
 
@Harvey said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1044828) said:
Love some of the new rule interpretations they are trialling in this game


Lol
Forced in-goal is a beauty !
 
Twice Milford has either been tackled in goal, or dragged back after he was held and the refs are too soft make a call. They have just let him move back into the field of play and play the ball.
 
Refs missed Milford holding back player chasing a lose ball and a forward pass.

That is a disgraceful refereeing performance.
 
@Jimmy said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1044834) said:
Mosby held off the ball, they get 6 again lol....refs need to be dropped

That's what I thought as well
 
Back
Top