Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So u didn’t see Deardon WALK straight PAST him in the first half then? But in attack he actually did something. Much overall better game by him last nite, about time. Must have read my posts?!?A special call out to our second rower PORTER , he set up two try’s with great runs , was his best game played the whole game I think , his defence is pretty good , just needs to continue to improve his attack . WELL PLAYED
How does bunji not work on skids’s defence?? It’s been happening for months, coming in and taking nobody is his mantra! What is bunji doing??Most of those games , the bulk of opposition tries are scored when we are reduced to 12.
The kids just aren’t capable of the resilience required for defending with 12 men . But how many of those infringements were actually yellow/red card . The hip drops … well yea , the nrl drew a line in the sand , and obviously Sezer and a few others didn’t read that email .
But there’s been some diabolical decisions re. Seyfarth and a few others that are horsehit . Like when api got sent when he was square at marker , and the play the ball moved off the spot . Cost us that game as well .
It’s just “yea we got that one wrong “ from annelsley , and then rinse repeat the next week .
I honestly think whist the Sutton gang and annelsley are in charge we are not going to get 50/50 shake of the run of the green . There’s 💯 an unconscious bias , whether people want to admit it or not .
You can’t ref bash for api missing a million tackles and Staines shooting up at ghosts for whatever reason , or ridiculous offloads to no one .
That put us in a vulnerable position for F**kery to begin .
But why does the shenanigans have to happen when we are in these positions ? That’s the issue .
If we are up by 20 , these things don’t happen , but as soon as it’s a close game , and we invite pressure , we get 2-3 horrendous wtf calls , which changes the outcome of the game .
Of course we should be resilient and withhold and defend . But to imply “we are just shit” , it’s intellectually dishonest and totally dismisses the lack of accountability the officials have on this game .
Italian football had very similar issues 10 years ago and it came out that match fixing was rife in that league .
I’m not saying they’re corrupt , but I’m not not saying it as well .
It might even be as simple as these refs watching buzz whistle Dixie all week . It doesn’t make sense .
I think I am right , but go back and watch it again , I think he slipped into the player , that’s just bad luckA catch-up effort for a poor defensive read or just slow defensive positioning.
That's the way I see his "Defence"
Who is at fault and who has not corrected his faults??
Not finding touch was unfortunate but really, throwing an intercept pass down by 12 with 90 seconds to go needs to be judged on both the context of the game and the multiple try scoring and line breaks he created with his passing game.Coz he made 2 real changers. Failing to kick the ball out from a penalty is one of the worst ways of relinquishing profession and his intercept pass was never on but I’ll grant you it happens plenty of times and to much better players than him.
I just think he needs a rest coz he’s been looking like a bit aloof from the team of late. Just my opinion and I know hes got heaps of potential so I’m not saying he’s not part of our future just think he’s a bit flat.
I am not saying there isnt bias. Im saying that there is no conspiracy.Your last paragraph proves my point though . The ref is supposed to be impartial . Yesterday has no bearing on today , as today on tomorrow . It’s simply referee what’s in front of you .
But they’re not . A reputation in the very definition of the word , implies a bias coming into an interaction .
True but I am heavily trained in certain areas and its second nature for me to lean towards adaptation and improvisation when under duress. Our level of competency causes a lot of problems and they are exacerbated by our complete inability to defend an error or setback.You always seem to lean to “we just have to be better can’t blame the refs” which is the right frame of mind for a coach to be instilling in his players . Contrary to what you might think . I 100 💯 agree with you on this . Otherwise it leads to negative thoughts and scapegoating . And inevitably failure .
But we aren’t on the field , we arnt coaching.
So is constantly not preparing and performing to the required levels. We have brought this reputation upon ourselves over a long period of ineptness.As an observer , the fact reputation is a variable is a direct breach to the integrity of the game .
So why do you think the refs are doing it?And what your saying about the roosters is true , I knew they were a bad example when I used them , but the overall numbers don’t get to the heart of my point ie. when the game is on the line , I can’t see a ref making the most harshest interpretation possible . Their infringements are usually pretty on point with accuracy , as nothing like us , they are a hard team , with hard men , who’s game plan is to win the battle in the middle .
If we are poor , we should be punished , Ill disciplined, likewise .
But last night was something else entirely . And no I’m not excusing the horrendous api defence , the Staines catching flies , the poor execution out of transition .
But as I said in another response , being shit is not an invitation for the refs to begin the f**kery . It’s an invitation for the opposition to put us too the sword . But that’s not what’s been happening .
... theoretically ...Our problem is the NRL's problem. They can't indefinitely shift blame onto the weakest club. It makes a mockery of their salary cap, which is all about fairness. They can't perpetuate unfairness in that environment.
They sit and review tape , some teams are better at mid week politicking to get an advantage , obviously unconscious bias , broadcast pressure for a better spectacle and the definitions of what that means , external influence like 360, KPIs and the metrics on which referees performance is reviewed .I am not saying there isnt bias. Im saying that there is no conspiracy.
For 25 years now, Wests Tigers has not fulfilled its obligations to play elite Rugby League to the same standard that their peers do.
There is an expectation that players at this level do not hamper the flow of the game by lying in the ruck, being offside constantly or commiting illegal plays. There are certain intracacies, especially regarding defence that our squads have never embraced correctly. The wrestle being a big one. There are a couple of teams who the officials have noted are repeat offenders year after year in these areas. We are one of them.
True but I am heavily trained in certain areas and its second nature for me to lean towards adaptation and improvisation when under duress. Our level of competency causes a lot of problems and they are exacerbated by our complete inability to defend an error or setback.
So is constantly not preparing and performing to the required levels. We have brought this reputation upon ourselves over a long period of ineptness.
So why do you think the refs are doing it?
Why should they care? What is in it for them?Tucker - you may want to refamiliarize yourself with the term "conspiracy theory"... 😎 I think what people may be saying is that the bottom (weaker) clubs have copped the rough end of the pineapple, and the refs tend to favor the stronger clubs when it comes to some calls.
I think he needs to strip the squad back and re-instill the need to be as close to perfect as possible on the fundamentals. I mean for all his brash brilliance, Bula has made 28 errors this year. Too many. For all his leadership and kicking experience, Sezer is close to the worst in the comp for poor discipline. The guy has been charged and convicted 5 times and sat out 6 weeks whilst also being pinged for 16 penalties in 14 games - effectively the worst record in the competition. Api has had an indifferent year with lots of poor discipline and errors mixed with the worst defence in the comp - 100 missed tackles in 18 games is too many.In effect, if you are also familiar with football (of the round game category) - no different there too. This said, 100% with you - without doubt, we are at the darkest point of our combined history. I honestly can't even imagine how Marshall starts the training sessions on Monday, or what they video reviews of the games are like, for him and the team.
where were you sitting? I was up on the hill & he copped heaps 😂Coz they are so woke.
I started to voice my feelings but was told to stop and respect his right to leave for a better opportunity. His loyalty and heart were not even questioned.
On my way home I realised I’m officially a dinosaur and the way I was brought up is so different to today it’s useless trying to fight it.
Maybe time for me to leave the Forum, I’ll think about it over the weekend.
Seyfarth is part of the solutionThe easiest explanation is that we are ill-disciplined. Being at the bottom of the ladder makes it easier for the referee to penalise WTs without being scrutinised by the referee's boss. Each player needs to look at their own discipline and on a positive note I watched Seyfarth not react to overly aggressive play by a Cowboys' forward toward him when tackled. It seems the message is getting through to some of our players.
Agreed 💯. But it still begs the question . Why do our players need to be saints just to get a fair run of the green from the refs . No other team has play with that kind of noose hangin over thier head .The easiest explanation is that we are ill-disciplined. Being at the bottom of the ladder makes it easier for the referee to penalise WTs without being scrutinised by the referee's boss. Each player needs to look at their own discipline and on a positive note I watched Seyfarth not react to overly aggressive play by a Cowboys' forward toward him when tackled. It seems the message is getting through to some of our players.
As we improve, our 'image' with the referees will improve.Agreed 💯. But it still begs the question . Why do our players need to be saints just to get a fair run of the green from the refs . No other team has play with that kind of noose hangin over thier head .
Yes. Exactly.As we improve, our 'image' with the referees will improve.
Ive laid out my 'reasoning'.@Tucker
Also I’m fairly Certain I’ve had the same training or near or there to within reason , for obvious reason , that adapting to what’s in front of me is also par the course .
But the message I always took from that type of training , is to question especially in debrief , what that was about .
Which is pretty much what’s going on now . And whilst when given lemons you have to make lemonade , to not ask why you were given lemons in the first place , is to doom yourself to a never ending cycle of history repeating .
Which is where we are right now .
And once again , no , that doesn’t dismiss the teams own accountability for allowing the lemons to be a variable .
Yep, don't know what some reporters saw, but they reported that the crowd gave him a very nasty welcome last night.Stef didn't seem to cop much from the crowd
Ive laid out my 'reasoning'.
Once we get better, our reputation will improve.
For instance we'll be able to send 3 blokes into a tackle and not be penalised every time the ball comes free because the refs will believe that our guys dont always rake at the ball. At the moment, even I think they do. We have to review a lot of decisions currently as it is assumed we are in the wrong due to history saying that is usually the case.
As for the refs...I think the game is getting to fast for them to see everything. I am not sure what can be done about that. Should A.I. be employed? I dont know.